avatar
Molly Crane-Newman @mollycranenewman.bsky.social

Asked if the Trump admin will comply with Judge Farbiarz’s order to release Mahmoud Khalil, a DHS spokeswoman says, “An immigration judge, not a district judge, has the authority to decide if Mr. Khalil should be released or detained.”

image
jun 20, 2025, 8:06 pm • 290 91

Replies

avatar
Libraryanna @libraryanna.bsky.social

Funny, an immigration judge recently ordered his release but they said they needed a regular judge. At least he’s out.

jun 21, 2025, 12:54 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
The Ghost Of Sarra Copia Sullam @sarracopia.bsky.social

Immigration appeals go to regular courts of appeals, you ignorant buffoon. (The spokesman, not you.)

jun 21, 2025, 2:03 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
patw @aohriver.bsky.social

This question angers me. Why ask? It seems to give an expectancy or tacit permission to DHS to ignore the law.

jun 20, 2025, 9:13 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Michael Planey @airplaney.bsky.social

Always remember that Trump is a free man only because his attorneys ran out the clock That has been his M.O. for decades — abuse the latitude and goodwill of the courts to delay, defer and deny until it’s too late The judges must recognize this and tighten up their courtesies to ensure justice

jun 20, 2025, 11:14 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
Jim Corbelli @jmidnight.bsky.social

Take the DHS out and shoot it.

jun 20, 2025, 10:48 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Socially Distant Lovser @socdistantlovser.bsky.social

They will face plant epically

jun 20, 2025, 8:46 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Kat in Az @katphxaz.bsky.social

Immigration judges are part of DOJ - Why are they even called judges, which implies neutrality??

jun 20, 2025, 8:49 pm • 37 0 • view
avatar
Thomas Edwards @mpeg2tom.bsky.social

And Trump fired the good immigration judges www.npr.org/2025/04/22/n...

jun 20, 2025, 9:36 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Kat in Az @katphxaz.bsky.social

Of course he did!

jun 21, 2025, 3:26 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
le Pooch Noir @eltiante.bsky.social

There are lots of administrative judges throughout the federal govt (and in state govts). They are legitimate exactly because they are subject to review by Art. III judges, as here. Which is why DHS spokesidiot has it backwards.

jun 20, 2025, 9:13 pm • 39 1 • view
avatar
randomino.bsky.social @randomino.bsky.social

Being subject to review by judges doesn't make them "judges" though, and we should stop calling them that.

jun 20, 2025, 9:28 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
pharmboy81.bsky.social @pharmboy81.bsky.social

So fucking tired of this fascist bullshit from every last God damned person in this administration.

jun 20, 2025, 10:57 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
aruss updates @aruss-updates.bsky.social

Is an immigration judge “lower” than a district judge?

jun 20, 2025, 10:48 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
adambirnbaum.bsky.social @adambirnbaum.bsky.social

They aren't judges. They're administrative hearing officers. That's why Trump's goons want the immigration court alone to rule - because Trump is their boss.

jun 20, 2025, 11:25 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
kaightcat.bsky.social @kaightcat.bsky.social

Yes, very much so. They are not part of the judicial branch, they are employees of the DOJ. Most decisions by an immigration judge can be appealed to the Bureau of Immigration Appeals. Most BIA decisions can then be appealed to an Article III district judge.

jun 20, 2025, 11:13 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Howl @dohowl.bsky.social

Cherry-picking judges.

jun 20, 2025, 11:04 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
A Reader @areader55.bsky.social

So the answer is no.

jun 20, 2025, 8:12 pm • 6 0 • view
avatar
BlondeJustice @blondejustice.bsky.social

Of course, Tricia is 100% incorrect and is paid to lie to American public.

jun 20, 2025, 8:50 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Toby Schaffer @tobyschaffer.bsky.social

"their conduct denies the result of the 2024 election" barely spitting distance from explicitly saying Trump was elected king

jun 20, 2025, 9:28 pm • 41 0 • view
avatar
TAGHIVscience @taghivscience.bsky.social

They consistently try to pretend that the US Constitution somehow allows people to vote for fascism. There's no such thing as a voter mandate for breaking the law.

jun 20, 2025, 9:34 pm • 15 0 • view
avatar
Bill McCormick @billmccormickpm.bsky.social

Yep. Its nuts. You won an election. Its not a get out of jail free card or a mandate to ignore the laws of the land

jun 20, 2025, 10:33 pm • 11 0 • view
avatar
God-Emperor Tsunami 💙 #FBPE #BLM #GTTO @tsunami65.bsky.social

As expected, Trump ignores all judgements he doesn't like.

jun 20, 2025, 8:18 pm • 18 0 • view
avatar
Stressed_Scientist @wittyretorthere.bsky.social

Exact opposite here actually. Trump and his people whine and moan and then obey the ruling, just like they have many times they couldn't get a higher court stay (don't get me wrong, screw him and anyone who willingly associates with him, but he just ignores the courts is a trope that needs to die.)

jun 20, 2025, 9:43 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
katefromnyc.bsky.social @katefromnyc.bsky.social

They’ve complied w some orders. But they defied Boasburg’s order to return planes, dragged out compliance with SCOTUS order to facilitate the return of Abrego, and they are currently defying a court order to issue correct passports to transgender individuals. The record of compliance isn’t stellar.

jun 21, 2025, 6:02 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
katefromnyc.bsky.social @katefromnyc.bsky.social

I think they did ignore the SCOTUS ruling to facilitate the return of Abrego, at least until they could find something to charge him with and a prosecutor willing to sign off. But you’re right, they did bring him back. And they flounted Boasburg’s order about removals, w weak justification. But yeah

jun 20, 2025, 10:20 pm • 7 0 • view
avatar
Stressed_Scientist @wittyretorthere.bsky.social

Crap somehow absentmindedly switched almost always obey to obey because I was specifically thinking the Abrego process was so egregious no serious person could argue they were trying to be in compliance. In general they take advantage of an insanely biased/weak SCOTUS so that whenever they get 1/

jun 20, 2025, 10:34 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Stressed_Scientist @wittyretorthere.bsky.social

struck down they use another technically legal, but would never happen with a more non-biased SCOTUS, mechanism to try to get the same results. This sucks and is really bad faith but still technically complying kind of thing. I hate the trope because it ignores that SCOTUS is the cause, not Trump.

jun 20, 2025, 10:34 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
katefromnyc.bsky.social @katefromnyc.bsky.social

But yeah, they clearly are trying to pursue their goals, not lose face, and still stay barely compliant w courts. They’ll comply with an unambiguous order like this. And then they’ll double down on efforts to deport him, bc if they don’t, it will be harder to deport other similar perm residents.

jun 20, 2025, 10:24 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Kait Richardson 🥔 @thryse.com

This is exactly backwards. Immigration judges are DOJ - executive branch - and subject to actual judicial branch oversight.

jun 20, 2025, 10:21 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Molly Crane-Newman @mollycranenewman.bsky.social

Khalil can be released when his lawyer turns over his passport, the magistrate judge rules bsky.app/profile/inne...

jun 20, 2025, 8:09 pm • 143 22 • view
avatar
Molly Crane-Newman @mollycranenewman.bsky.social

New order — Farbiarz orders Khalil’s release for 6:30 pm CT. He must surrender his passport, and the gov has to give him a copy of it and his green card.

image
jun 20, 2025, 9:00 pm • 134 27 • view
avatar
krappedpants69.bsky.social @krappedpants69.bsky.social

Despite their bluster, he's free. But the type of shit the admin keeps saying about judges not having authority is an attempt to keep softening the ground further and we must keep calling it out and saying "no" to them, as a society. bsky.app/profile/jake...

jun 20, 2025, 11:46 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Molly Crane-Newman @mollycranenewman.bsky.social

Khalil has been released! bsky.app/profile/oliv...

jun 20, 2025, 11:54 pm • 88 18 • view
avatar
Missy Hubbard @missy-ubermom.bsky.social

I’ve been waiting for this news!!! Was driving down to the beach & was in the abyss as far as the internet is concerned. This is WONDERFUL!!! Thank you Molly!

jun 21, 2025, 12:26 am • 4 0 • view
avatar
barskin™ @barskin.bsky.social

Oh...now they want due process, huh?

jun 20, 2025, 8:17 pm • 28 2 • view
avatar
Daddy McQuaig @mcquaig.bsky.social

They have no mandate. The election is over and its not a 4-year-get-outta-jail free card - its the burden of leadership and bureaucracy.

jun 20, 2025, 8:49 pm • 17 0 • view
avatar
Crip Dyke @cripdyke.bsky.social

I'm sorry, what? Article 3 judges have no say, only executive branch employees can review XB actions? So if they throw flash bangs through my window and haul me down to the federal detention centre wo ever citing a charge or giving me a court date, my habeas petition is reviewed by the FBI?

jun 20, 2025, 11:47 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
mbl3413.bsky.social @mbl3413.bsky.social

"An Immigration Judge, who we can fire if we don't like their actions, only has the authority to release him".

jun 20, 2025, 8:09 pm • 71 2 • view
avatar
mbl3413.bsky.social @mbl3413.bsky.social

Haha they bitched out. Fuck her and Trump

jun 20, 2025, 11:55 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Berserker Coach @berserkercoach.bsky.social

the FUCK? Bro, do you even law?

jun 20, 2025, 9:38 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Lucha @iustitia100.bsky.social

I knew they would try to keep him.

jun 20, 2025, 10:15 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Rudely Van Gelder @rudelyvangelder.bsky.social

MAGA: “District judges suck." [Matthew Kacsmaryk has entered the chat] MAGA: “District judges are AWESOME!"

jun 20, 2025, 11:07 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Irishwhisky24 🇮🇪🇺🇸 @irishwhisky24.bsky.social

So, contempt then, right?

jun 20, 2025, 9:20 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Mercurywoodrose (code name for decades) @mercurywoodrose.bsky.social

Tear a sheet of sandpaper. Is that property damage?

jun 20, 2025, 11:08 pm • 0 0 • view