avatar
Jeffrey Sens @jeffreysens.bsky.social

I mean it as, I have a theory of power. Excessively self-interested power holders should always be regarded as potential little tyrants. And Newsom platformed Charlie Kirk. Etc., so it's really reasonable to very, very skeptical.

sep 1, 2025, 10:30 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
O.💗💛💙 🐳 ⁷⁼ ¹she/her ⟭⟬ᴱ ᴬᴿᴱ ᴮ⟬⟭ᶜᴷ @odetteroulette.bsky.social

It's really not. One man saying he's not sure abt trans athletes does not negate years of support, or it should not. It simply means Newsom has issues, not the party itself. And we're far from some theory of power involving Democrats. Please remember the GOP will kill trans ppl most certainly.

sep 1, 2025, 10:40 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
O.💗💛💙 🐳 ⁷⁼ ¹she/her ⟭⟬ᴱ ᴬᴿᴱ ᴮ⟬⟭ᶜᴷ @odetteroulette.bsky.social

As they are literally saying so. Meanwhile you have some skepticism based on ... one white guy's behavior. Is there any certainty left to condemn the GOP and keep them out of office? Because there needs to be.

sep 1, 2025, 10:41 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Jeffrey Sens @jeffreysens.bsky.social

He platformed fascists Evangelical Christians to "discuss or debate" transgender lives. Yeah really it strikes me as completely reasonable to have it severely question Newsom's motives and commitment. Because platforming them is not good. It is harmful.

sep 1, 2025, 10:44 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
O.💗💛💙 🐳 ⁷⁼ ¹she/her ⟭⟬ᴱ ᴬᴿᴱ ᴮ⟬⟭ᶜᴷ @odetteroulette.bsky.social

Yes, I remember. I'm not discussing one dude though. I'm discussing the whole party, which has always been supportive of trans rights, has it written into the platform and passed laws supportive of trans rights when they were in power.

sep 1, 2025, 10:45 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
O.💗💛💙 🐳 ⁷⁼ ¹she/her ⟭⟬ᴱ ᴬᴿᴱ ᴮ⟬⟭ᶜᴷ @odetteroulette.bsky.social

These threads are in response to journalists blaming Democrats for GOP behavior. Gavin's stupid ass transphobic bullshit isn't a reason to decide an entire party, always reliable as a whole, is somehow suspect now.

sep 1, 2025, 10:47 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
O.💗💛💙 🐳 ⁷⁼ ¹she/her ⟭⟬ᴱ ᴬᴿᴱ ᴮ⟬⟭ᶜᴷ @odetteroulette.bsky.social

I'm seeing a pattern. Stay with me on this: 1. A Democrat does something stupid. 2. Suddenly, the entire party is "terrible" except they aren't really but no one is listening now 3. this happens about a year or so before elections 4. Bots appear to support "Dems suck"

sep 1, 2025, 10:52 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
O.💗💛💙 🐳 ⁷⁼ ¹she/her ⟭⟬ᴱ ᴬᴿᴱ ᴮ⟬⟭ᶜᴷ @odetteroulette.bsky.social

5. GOP win election because Dem votes are suppressed over this issue 6. GOP do something even worse than Democrats were NEVER going to do, but ppl pretended they MIGHT do, even if Dems provided a solution,never stood wrongly on this issue. 7. We fall further into fascism. Does this sound familiar?

sep 1, 2025, 10:53 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Jeffrey Sens @jeffreysens.bsky.social

Then yeah we have crossed contexts. Newsom got introduced above thread, so any comment of mine is probably tangential.

sep 1, 2025, 10:50 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
O.💗💛💙 🐳 ⁷⁼ ¹she/her ⟭⟬ᴱ ᴬᴿᴱ ᴮ⟬⟭ᶜᴷ @odetteroulette.bsky.social

Well I am little concerned about that "whole party" thing though, but anyway, I hope you read what I wrote and give it some thought.

sep 1, 2025, 10:54 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Jeffrey Sens @jeffreysens.bsky.social

Ok the OP is blocked, so I can't tell what you are reacting to originally. Shouldn't have left it alone.

sep 1, 2025, 10:40 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
O.💗💛💙 🐳 ⁷⁼ ¹she/her ⟭⟬ᴱ ᴬᴿᴱ ᴮ⟬⟭ᶜᴷ @odetteroulette.bsky.social

I haven't blocked the original OP nor has she blocked me that I know of. It's probably someone in the line above as there are many bots who also are skeptical of Democrats and I have blocked those.

sep 1, 2025, 10:42 pm • 0 0 • view