I wish I could.
I wish I could.
Are there specific thresholds for this? I.e. what happens if the value doubles over the next decades?
Yeah, but... Black Friday, Cyber Monday and Singles Day are right around the corner. Consumers are busy, as always. Time to wake up next year, or the year after that. Consuming is hard work!
Do you mean that without fossil fuels, people couldn't afford to buy so many things ? Well it's a pretty well convincing explanation of why they still use them ...
I think they mean that unbridled consumerism is one of the reason that we’re heading for possibly catastrophic climate change. Buying tons of plastic days before Christmas that are destined for landfill the week after is both unnecessary and unhelpful
I understand that, but it also means that it's impossible to maintain this consumerism without fossil fuels (which is not obvious, but has consequences on the acceptability of climate policies)
People have termed this the poly crisis; which climate change is one part of. Other crisis are: plastic, PFAS, antibiotic resistance, food insecurity, soil erosion, just to mention a few. A lot of these are driven by out of control capitalism. Encouraging consumerism makes all of them worse.
It, maintaining consumerism will drag us over all sorts of edges
but apparently, it doesn't prevent you to use a computer connected to internet ...
That’s correct. I’m not sure whether you’re trying to make a point or just trolling.
I'm making a point that nobody really wants to give up all the comfort of modern civilization.
You have a point. However, I’ve given up stuff yet live comfortably using very little fossil fuels. Wind and solar power when available, gas otherwise. Over time that’ll become marginal. African countries seem to move straight to solar: cheap and totally abundant.
The aberrant reality powered by fossil fuels pervades every aspect of modern life. Perversely, this aberration constitutes the implied “promise“ that we all grew up with and messaging that it all needs to be ripped away is a recipe for provoking a backlash.
@altnoaa.bsky.social @altnoaaclimate.bsky.social @altfws.altgov.info
We r priming a heat engine, interesting 🤔
Trump and his sponsors love these charts. Their goal is to accelerate warming, to literally roast the Global South. Hence the wall. Hence USAID. Hence Greenland. Hence Canada. People should start taking them seriously. www.foxbusiness.com/energy/epas-...
sure but check out the fall in the 3rd derivative
Clutching at straws here: Is the pentadal trendline linear?
See doi.org/10.1175/JCLI...
Depressing
Or any of the three, really
This bugs me more than anything. Please let me know how I can educate others on this. It is so hard to cover authoritarian takeover (70% of the earth is run by Fascists or sliding to fascism) and still have time to cover this, too. Although, without a livable environment, politics is a null issue!
How does confidence in the data from the 60s compared to more recent years? I’m imagining our capacity for gathering data to measure OHC has changed greatly over that time, and I am wondering how this would look with a shaded confidence interval superimposed on the plot.
See Figure 2 in doi.org/10.1038/s415...
Thank you. Pretty much what I expect expected. It looks the world to me like the entire dataset would produce an exponential curve of best fit consistent with the findings of acceleration. We’re producing a #Juggernaut.
Thanks for keeping this in our sights, Zack. Gonna share this on my Substack today.
Isn’t this the place we should look for warming acceleration rather than surface temperatures? I understand it might take another decade to rule out short term variability. However, this is where more than 90% of the warming will end up (the oceans).