Mamet has been a misanthrope and misogynist much longer than he’s been self-identified as a “conservative.” I think detesting humanity in general (and specific) corrodes the spirit sooner rather than later and contributes to a reactionary embrace.
Mamet has been a misanthrope and misogynist much longer than he’s been self-identified as a “conservative.” I think detesting humanity in general (and specific) corrodes the spirit sooner rather than later and contributes to a reactionary embrace.
(Look at Edmond [1982] and Oleanna [1992] for particularly potent examples of the above, yet I think the same belief system pervades his body of work, including the more popular plays and films.)