I always see you people completely omit and refusing to address the fact that in practical terms there's only a fraction of a fraction of a percent of "decentralization" on Bluesky. I think you've redefined the meaning of the word for your own convenience.
it's of course then really comfy to claim the other side doesn't want to understand but it seems there's a fair bit of that going on by the Bluesky proponents.
I'm not claiming the network is super decentralized and not reliant on Bluesky PBC at all, I'm saying people on Fedi misunderstand a lot of how things work here. E.g. they don't realize that the Mississippi IP block can be easily worked around, and that Bluesky didn't just "block entire network".
That just seems a bit like saying X is great and just as good as anything because you can still see message threads there using xcancel (or a couple of other nitter instances) and also is ignoring that Bluesky corp does have the ability to do blocks that would be harder to evade.
I command your bravery Kuba, I have no time to waste to engage with these idiocies This dude managed to cram so many logical fallacies in just one post, which I admit is low-key impressive
XKCD 386 😛
and this guy should point out the fallacies if there are any instead of cowardly insulting from behind a block
But then this is not the first time I've run into this guy that deals with the first sight of pushback with blocking. Not a critical thinker.
Whataboutism, strawmen, faulty generalizations, that was a feast of intellectual nonsense