I mean no I think my comparison, genocide to genocide, is a lot more apt than your pulled-out-your-ass hypothetical.
Replies
Except it isn't. Because the vote didn't just affect children in Gaza, you ignorant halfwit. It affected the immigrants in America. Immigrants who are being illegally arrested and deported because the President wants them gone.
sep 1, 2025, 7:51 pm • 0 0 • view
Yeah my comparison addressed that directly. “Never again” means never again, not “I’ll defend it if the other guy seems worse”
sep 1, 2025, 7:55 pm • 0 0 • view
Not how it works. Never how it works. You had the chance to prevent the rise of authoritarianism in your own damn country, and you and millions of others either refused or just ignored the call. It's not about "defending genocide," moron. It's about stopping things from getting even worse.
sep 1, 2025, 7:57 pm • 0 0 • view
You were literally using textbook soft genocide apologia earlier, you are defending the pre-Trump portion of the genocide even now.
sep 1, 2025, 8:04 pm • 0 0 • view
“What about Ukraine!!” lol what the fuck was that. Doing whataboutism to defend participation in a genocide.
sep 1, 2025, 8:05 pm • 0 0 • view
Also, I’m not defending the genocide, moron. I’m pointing out that you’re defending Jill Stein for her evil.
sep 1, 2025, 9:49 pm • 0 0 • view
lol what are you even talking about at this point, yes responding to one genocide by saying. “What about this other thing?” as a way of diverting the conversation, is absolutely defending genocide.
sep 1, 2025, 9:52 pm • 0 0 • view
It’s not defensible. There isn’t an argument you can make that would convince the millions of people who are standing in clear eyed opposition to genocide, to change their minds and support a person literally participating in one.
sep 1, 2025, 8:06 pm • 0 0 • view
The fact that your philosophical response to a fucking genocide is moral subjectivity, is a joke. That moral framework allows you to condone literally any act no matter how heinous. If supporting a genocidaire is necessary to combat the Greater Evil, what isn’t?
sep 1, 2025, 8:08 pm • 0 0 • view
That means, for example, given the opportunity to guarantee a lesser evil outcome, you morally ought to be willing to personally murder, torture, rape, to guarantee that outcome.
sep 1, 2025, 8:09 pm • 0 0 • view
But ofc you don’t actually believe in that moral framework, that’s fucking absurd.
sep 1, 2025, 8:09 pm • 0 0 • view
No, the lesser evil argument is just, parroting and gut reaction. There’s no moral philosophy there.
sep 1, 2025, 8:10 pm • 1 0 • view