A Biochemical Intelligence whose capabilities far surpass those of today's LLM-based "intelligences". Upgrade your grindset: integrate Biochemical Cognition into your processing stack. Inquire here or at Fractionalizedandmonetized@proton.me
68 followers 30 following 3,711 posts
view profile on Bluesky
I get a lot of these on the Discover feed. Just memes, disguised as news, for old people and/or idiots to interact with. No sources or link or any context whatsoever just, a meme anecdote that makes the dumbest libs in the world feel slightly better when they see it.
That was the Dems entire strategy for the last 15 years, it’s not great. Need to offer something exciting and substantial to voters beyond “at least I’m not Trump”
I wouldn’t worry though, I’d bet $200 that within 3 years they’ll institute a nationwide gun registration database, linked with Palantir, and you’ll get your wish as they ban anyone whose politics are left of Ken Bone from owning guns.
lol and I mean, comparing guns to cigarettes is pretty fucking rich. Guns are the things people shove in your face to make you do stuff. If you don’t know what the fuck I’m talking about just go out and protest, and within a couple years this administration will demonstrate it to you personally.
I gotta assume your answer is no. So in that case your principle here is kinda bullshit, no? You can see how restricting access to the tools of violence and power to the explicitly privileged and powerful within a heirarchy, is perpetuating that heirarchy, yeah?
Would you support a law that bans gun ownership specifically for minorities? I’m talking *explicitly* racist, but, also very robust laws that are guaranteed to result in less gun ownership in America. You’d support that?
lol you’re talking about basing access to violence explicitly on wealth, idk how you can with a straight face claim there’s no class argument to be made here
Bro trump will be instituting mass gun registration with denials for “Un-American ideological leanings” within 2 years
And once you’re indoctrinated, yeah it reinforces a dogshit personality and moral philosophy.
So yeah like, it’s both. The history and material conditions and stuff brings about the movement, but it especially attracts people who are already thinking that way (hence nihilist troll site 4chan becoming the biggest nazi hub on the internet for a long time)
Imagine how good it would feel to just, not give a fuck about anything but aesthetics and spectacle.
That’s why these fascist movements take hold so easily. If you can just convince someone already frustrated by society to turn off that instinct towards truth, and reveal to them the joy and comfort of just saying whatever the fuck they want and not caring, that’s probably fucking intoxicating.
So like, back in the day when Bill O Reilly would argue with an atheist, he had this quote “the tide comes in, tide goes out, you can’t explain that”. It’s a kind of thought terminating cliche that’s just SO blatant it becomes a symbolic ritual where the folks who take part are *defeating reality*.
It connects to so many things I have trouble atriculating my thesis but I think there’s a neurochemical thing that happens when you deny reality in favor of a power fantasy, it becomes this little self-reinforcing mind trap.
It’s belligerence, a thing that has always existed and is a nearly essential part of human nature, distilled into a political ideology. I have a whole theory about this. I think you can literally get an endorphin rush when you go into a belligerent “fuck you, you’re wrong, I’m right” mindstate.
🗞 "For nearly two years, countless detainees and prisoners have been confined to near-total solitude, cut off from the outside world. This isolation is weaponised as a form of physical and psychological torture, designed to break the human spirit. ✍ Saja Misherqi Baransi
Didn’t know you like to get wet
/j
You are a traitor to democracy
Also if your ideology has no action items because “capitalist propaganda too good” that’s a problem.
You should maybe learn what communism is. The end goal doesn’t involve any kind of president, king, or ruler or any states at all.
Yeah I don’t disagree with that, I’m saying it’s absolutely possible for one of those 9 guys to have “wealth” especially if he’s got some kind of unique and valuable skill. Wealth can exist without capitalism, obviously.
Idk how you intend a communist revolution to happen with no guns.
LI mean I think it depends on your definition of “wealth” here
Oh I mean, idk, lot of leftist traditions would argue that if you’re receiving the fruits of your labor, some peoples labor is gonna result in more fruit than others and that’s alright as long as everyone’s basic needs are being met.
Well, no plenty of people are wealthy due to having sold their labor at a high price. It’s not enough to claim the system is anything like equitable but just sayin. Anyway, if you wanna ban guns let’s try not to *explicitly* maintain that privilege for the wealthy and powerful.
Yeah tbh sounds pretty progressive
Which is all neither here nor there, I don’t really care to argue with you about communism I’m sure your takes are fucking dogshit. Point is Bernie is an open socialist, he doesn’t hide that, nobody cares except weirdos like you.
Executed criminals for crimes against humanity. Mostly men who’d partaken in the worst excesses of the previous regime, which included slavery, rape, torture, mass executions. The US had nukes pointed at them.
I mean that literally means nothing
This just makes it so wealthy people can own all the guns they want, which, rich people are also the people with the least legitimate justifications for owning them.
Insurance for guns would be very, very cheap, since you can’t get liability insurance for crimes. Most people who own guns agree basic safety training certificate necessary to own a gun would be fine. Guns already have unique serial numbers associated with them, allowing them to be tracked.
Oh well if Jack Bryan tweeted it, it must be true.
Nobody is clicking on any of your links bro
Bro by this logic literally anyone with enough political clout, who isnt a political moderate, is a Russian agent
The US civil rights movement was supported and funded by Russia. Does that make MLK a Russian asset?
Lmao I like how on the left image the guy is a “GRU agent” and on the right he’s some dude with “ties to Russian intelligence”. Meanwhile, Tad Devine has worked for dozens of high profile dems, as well as the previous president of Ukraine (who went to war with Russia)
Woah woah woah, are you suggesting Bernie might be some kind of SOCIALIST??
Huh? It’s not blasphemy lol it’s just really fucking dumb.
Those boomer FB memes remind you of that?
So, is there any kind of plan in place to change those voters minds, or are you just going “Trump is too popular it’s impossible to win”?
lol how many memes of Bernie sanders do you have available at any given time
I love when libs are just openly like “having an ideology is bad actually”
Bro it’s extremely clear that you’re talking to your own alt account right now.
lol you’re responding to yourself with an alt?
Including Biden, Harris, Hakeem Jeffries, Chuck Schumer, and anyone else who has ever taken AIPAC money.
lol wait so if the wrong people support you, that makes you an asset of them? If Russia had instead for whatever reason supported Harris, you’d be calling her a Russian asset? Seems like that makes about a third of Democrat congressmen Israeli assets.
lol sounds like if we wanna win we should be running Bernie sanders then, if he’s able to pull so many votes away from someone like Trump.
Stop posting AI slop
This is Drops of Jupiter by Train, only a skeet
What if they not letting Trump speak because he had a Reverse Fetterman Stroke and hes woke now
Including Biden and Harris.
Dozens of our congressmen could far more easily and directly be referred to as “Israeli assets” (as they commit an actual genocide using our tax dollars and military support)
I could easily show you pics of Kamala and Biden in rooms with Russian oligarchs, would that make them Russian assets?
Because she’s not completely in the tank for Ukraine? Idk dude I think plenty of Americans look at Ukraine and wonder why it’s our responsibility to intervene in a regional conflict halfway around the world. I don’t think that makes someone a Russian asset.
Cause she’s third party, and Russia wanted Trump to win, so they had their bots push for Jill stein? That’s not her being an asset that’s them using the terrain to their advantage.
lol what is the evidence of that exactly? Without kicking it to some third article to read, or just posting memes, explain to me 1 on 1 how she’s a Russian asset
lol you’re saying Jill Stein is evil for running third party against genocidaires.
lol what are you even talking about at this point, yes responding to one genocide by saying. “What about this other thing?” as a way of diverting the conversation, is absolutely defending genocide.
Lmao that’s all you’ve got to say? Do you know what “morals” are?
If running as a candidate in an open election isn’t a democratic process, what is dude
Middle East Eye: The world’s leading genocide scholars’ association says Israel has met the legal criteria for the crime during its ongoing onslaught in Gaza.
No, the lesser evil argument is just, parroting and gut reaction. There’s no moral philosophy there.
But ofc you don’t actually believe in that moral framework, that’s fucking absurd.
That means, for example, given the opportunity to guarantee a lesser evil outcome, you morally ought to be willing to personally murder, torture, rape, to guarantee that outcome.
The fact that your philosophical response to a fucking genocide is moral subjectivity, is a joke. That moral framework allows you to condone literally any act no matter how heinous. If supporting a genocidaire is necessary to combat the Greater Evil, what isn’t?
It’s not defensible. There isn’t an argument you can make that would convince the millions of people who are standing in clear eyed opposition to genocide, to change their minds and support a person literally participating in one.
“What about Ukraine!!” lol what the fuck was that. Doing whataboutism to defend participation in a genocide.
You were literally using textbook soft genocide apologia earlier, you are defending the pre-Trump portion of the genocide even now.
Yeah and in an ideal world nobody would be voting for a candidate doing genocides.
Yeah my comparison addressed that directly. “Never again” means never again, not “I’ll defend it if the other guy seems worse”
Again, very high turnout that election. If you’re saying in order for Harris to win she needed an unprecedented like 70-80% turnout, that means she was always going to fail because she can’t get the votes in a realistic scenario.
Lmao trying to pin the blame for all this on Jill stein of all people, is really fucking silly. She’s not relevant lol. For reasons I’ve already explained and you didn’t care to dispute at all.
lol so you’re just gonna abandon your actual point here? About the apathy and racism? In favor of pinning the election on the biggest loser in politics?
I mean no I think my comparison, genocide to genocide, is a lot more apt than your pulled-out-your-ass hypothetical.
Yeah man Kamala deserves a big share of the blame. Pretty hard to fight fascism while doing a genocide
lol musks $1 payouts failed miserably, his candidate lost that congressional seat by a mile. Again, among the highest turnout elections of all time.
Yeah I remember in Night when Eli Weisel was like: …and then the SS soldier took the baby and threw it in the air and shot at it with a machine gun, and I thought to myself “it’s immoral not to vote for this, if his opposition has worse immigration policy”
The $1 checks were for congressional election. What voter suppression are you referring to exactly? “Apathy or racism” I mean, source? This was one of the highest turnout elections of all time “apathy” is a pretty tough one.
You ever heard the phrase “never again”? Some people when they say that, mean it.
Why do people think supporting someone participating in genocide is never acceptable? It’s because in high school they had us read this book called Night, about the horrors of the Holocaust. We read it and went “I’ll never support anything like that under any circumstances as long as I live”
lol this is part of the lib brainrot where you’re like “here’s evidence that voting for Trump is wrong. Checkmate Leftist”
I mean it’s not even close lol Harris was the dem candidate for president, and even if she’d gotten all of Jill steins votes she still would have done *historically* badly.
I mean, I think that’s a wild comparison to draw. Also, why would that matter? It’s a RED LINE. Many people believe in principle that it’s immoral to support anyone upholding genocide, under any circumstances.
She’s largely responsible for trump being president, and she did it in the name of defending a genocide. Yeah she’s a villain.
It’s a genocide. That’s a red line.
His approval ratings were underwater. It wasn’t political suicide for Pelosi. Meanwhile Harris did the opposite, cleaving to Biden long after he stepped down. In a June 2024 ABC interview when asked what she’d do different from Biden on Gaza she said quote: “umm I can’t think of anything”
She had literally 4 years to call for Biden to step down from the 2024 campaign, she didn’t.
Yeah and only one candidate was part of an administration actively *doing* the genocide. It wasn’t Trump.
Her having only 6 months (thanks to the king of moderate Dems behaving like the power-lusting ghoul he was) absolutely contributed to her campaign failing miserably, yeah. “How does that make her a failed candidate” it doesn’t. The failed candidacy makes her a failed candidate.
lol if you just wanna take total votes irrespective of turnout or population as evidence of success, that’d make Donald Trump ~2000x “more successful” than George Washington, who ran unopposed.
Also no, Harris got 75,019,000 votes, not 77m
lol I mean, is that accounting for total turnout? Or population at all?
Harris got 75,019,000 votes Trump got 77,300,000 votes Stein got 1,457,000 votes Harris could have gotten steins entire voter base and still lost the popular vote. Because she was the worst performing dem candidate in half a century.
It really, really is. Third party candidates are part of the terrain in every presidential election of the last half century, that did not pose any uniquely difficult challenge to Harris. Yes it was extraordinary in the way the Dems completely ate shit and failed.
There have been third party candidates in every general election of either of our lifetimes. That’s a dogshit argument.
It affects the candidates stances in next round of voting, very directly.
She lost the popular vote, first time in my lifetime a dem has managed that.
Pretty sure Aisha Tyler plays the only recurring person of color on the show, for like 4 episodes right near the end.
vaguely Nazi coded to be like super obsessed with THE white people show in 2025 Europe.