avatar
Tim Corica @tcorica.bsky.social

Ok, so it's all differences of squares, which will factor nicely. (1-2)(1+2)+(3-4)(3+4)..... The first factor will always be -1, so we can factor it out. (-1)*[ ( 1+2) + (3+4) + ...(198+199) ]. So we have just the negative of the sum of integers from 1 to 199.

nov 24, 2024, 3:15 pm • 1 0

Replies

avatar
Tim Corica @tcorica.bsky.social

Using Gauss' childhood trick, we have 100 (1+199) so a final result of -20000. I check this idea for 1-4+9-16 and it gives -10 which makes sense. Feeling self-satisfied but not 100% confident, I punch it into Desmos and get 19900. Ach! I've missed something!

Desmos summation expression showing 19900.
nov 24, 2024, 3:15 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Tim Corica @tcorica.bsky.social

I see it! My expression ends with a negative 199^2, but the series ends with a positive. I'll trim off the 199, find the sum, and then add it back. The sum should be (198/2)*(1+198)=19701 plus 199 gives me 19900, which I know should be -19900. A nice problem over Sunday breakfast!

nov 24, 2024, 3:15 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Karen Campe @karencampe.bsky.social

Good work, but you retained a negative somewhere along the way... I believe the answer is +19900.

nov 24, 2024, 4:16 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Tim Corica @tcorica.bsky.social

Yes! Funny, that. I found the correct answer, but poisoned it by pulling back in an earlier thought that it would be negative because you are always subtracting a larger number. I didn't reconsider this when I removed the 199^2.

nov 24, 2024, 4:27 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Sue VanHattum @suevanh.bsky.social

Remove the 1^2 instead. Now it's all positive. Does that make it easier?

nov 25, 2024, 2:21 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Tim Corica @tcorica.bsky.social

Sure. I thought of that later. 😀

nov 25, 2024, 2:46 am • 2 0 • view