Color me silly if you want but I don't understand where I was "shaming" and "insulting" anyone. Do you mean because I said criticism that's not constructive is only whining? If I've shamed and insulted people who do this, then that's quite ok. Let them sit and think about using criticism for good.

in your argument it does not count because the people you are doing it to have not 'earned' the right to be considered people

You assume the only purpose of criticism is to shame and humiliate those considered inferior in order to encourage them to become superior. That's why politicians can criticise the people but the people can't criticise politicians. That's not constructive criticism. It is destructive.

breaking people down on purpose in order to 'encourage' them to comply and obey and become part of your 'we'

This only makes sense as chatbot stuff. I don't understand why, though. Create an asshole argument and then counter the argument via some random commenter who didn't even weigh in on the argument/counter-argument? Is it just to flood bluesky (keyword trans/Newsom) with a volume of useless chatter?

this is hyper normalisation in action you're entirely unable to comprehend any possibility of anything real/true/valid existing outside of your norms and values they are your entire universe