The most prominent use cases for AI content are in situations with captive audiences - a colleague or a professor is obliged to consume your slop whether they like it or not. The calculus for "good enough" out in the free market shifts dramatically against AI.
Perhaps also the video equivalent of deliberately-misspelled phishing emails? As in, anyone dumb enough to like it is a good mark for other stuff?
And your colleagues will hate you bsky.app/profile/spav...
And it could be plausible to output that many things, but there is a hard and fast limit to the amount of output one person can create per day, and that is 24 hours, and anything beyond that is automatically in the category of slop.
It only works if people cannot reliably distinguish quality, perhaps because they're being inundated with so much crap that they don't have time to evaluate each option. Cue LLMs *actual* killer application: spam.
Given the glut of media "discussion" this bar may be reached for a lot of the viewer base.
And whichever medium goes through this will die, or at least become a shadow of itself. Why did people grow to hate email? Both the literal spam, and the endless flood of “normal” emails that effectively are spam as well
Like if email worked like it originally did, or arguably as it was intended, would anyone actually prefer Slack? I sure as hell wouldn’t (and I actually don’t even prefer it with the shitty version of email that exists)