Yes - meaning if someone wanted to get private coverage or have better coverage through their employer they aren’t forced to change. What issue do you have with that?
Replies
fundamental misconceptions on the nature of public services, keeping administrative costs as high as possible, and it being a nonsense position we've already seen get binned immediately when it came time to do things.
aug 31, 2025, 3:30 am • 0 0 • view
I work in finance, have worked in the insurance industry, I know about the huge costs assoc w/all the middlemen and the exorbitant pay agents/execs receive. Everyone would be taxed for Medi4All, it would be cheaper than paying current prem&copays. People would realize and switch.
aug 31, 2025, 3:37 am • 0 0 • view
yes we saw this compromise position get ditched entirely when obama did it the first time starting with a more wasteful byzantine policy is a political loser
aug 31, 2025, 3:42 am • 0 0 • view
I’m not referring to the current “Affordable Care Act t”. That was a gift to the insurance companies. I’m talking about having a 5% tax on income and that would include all income getting rid of loopholes only the wealthy use.
aug 31, 2025, 3:47 am • 0 0 • view
the parallel thats relevant is obama also talked up a plan thats public option if you opt for it otherwise private if you prefer etc etc in hte debates and that was completely gone by the election. so saying stuff in a debate alone does not confer credibility
aug 31, 2025, 3:56 am • 0 0 • view
I blocked the bitch for basically calling me a MAGAt. She isn't interested in rational conversation like most liberals.
aug 31, 2025, 3:33 am • 0 0 • view