GRAND JURY NULLIFICATION! Prosecutors Fail to Secure Indictment Against Man Who Threw Sandwich at Federal Agent www.nytimes.com/2025/08/27/u...
Replies
(Though, to be fair, there's no way this actually met the threshold for a felony.)
aug 27, 2025, 1:13 pm • 998 20 • view
Yeah, I wouldn’t call it nullification - just the grand jury doing its job.
aug 27, 2025, 3:44 pm • 2 0 • view
I wouldn’t call it jury nullification where, as a matter of black letter law, the defendant simply did not do what they are accused of.
aug 28, 2025, 3:27 am • 1 0 • view
That hasn't really stopped prosecutors from getting an indictment before...
aug 27, 2025, 1:49 pm • 24 0 • view
Then why did you say nullification!
aug 27, 2025, 11:17 pm • 1 0 • view
And to be honest, if they got a judge who aligns with donold, that sandwich throwing hero would in Sudan or El Salvador
aug 27, 2025, 4:31 pm • 3 0 • view
Or "assault".
aug 27, 2025, 4:36 pm • 1 0 • view
More like "with salt."
aug 27, 2025, 4:49 pm • 3 0 • view
🤣
aug 27, 2025, 5:00 pm • 1 0 • view
It was assault with a breadly weapon!!! (I’ll see myself out.)
aug 27, 2025, 1:39 pm • 67 5 • view
He beat the wrap
aug 27, 2025, 3:21 pm • 6 0 • view
You’re in my tribe now. Welcome.
aug 27, 2025, 3:32 pm • 2 0 • view
aug 27, 2025, 6:31 pm • 1 0 • view
please follow back
aug 27, 2025, 6:31 pm • 0 0 • view
🤣🤣
aug 27, 2025, 3:35 pm • 0 0 • view
😂😂😂
aug 27, 2025, 1:53 pm • 1 0 • view
Just saying there was some REALLY sharp cheddar in there...
aug 27, 2025, 2:18 pm • 2 0 • view
(You’re coming with me)
aug 27, 2025, 2:59 pm • 2 0 • view
Puntastic!!!
aug 27, 2025, 2:11 pm • 2 1 • view
👏
aug 27, 2025, 1:43 pm • 3 0 • view
🤣🤣🤣🤣
aug 27, 2025, 1:53 pm • 17 0 • view
That is my FAVORITE gif!!!!
aug 27, 2025, 2:59 pm • 5 0 • view
He really got out of that legal pickle. It was a bum wrap. (Also, seeing myself out.)
aug 27, 2025, 7:11 pm • 3 0 • view
I have a table in hell if anyone wants to stop by for drinks. Bring ice.
aug 27, 2025, 7:12 pm • 3 0 • view
Not ICE!!!! It better be a long table.
aug 27, 2025, 7:22 pm • 1 0 • view
aug 27, 2025, 3:24 pm • 1 0 • view
Right?! Absolutely insane choices all round, including sending *20 armed law enforcement officers in riot gear* to his home after he’d already tried to turn himself in.
aug 27, 2025, 3:21 pm • 14 1 • view
So not actually nullification, but refusal to unfairly indict. Nullification is when the facts and law support guilt.
aug 27, 2025, 3:34 pm • 3 0 • view
If prosecutors are seeking convictions instead of justice, they shouldn't be prosecutors.
aug 27, 2025, 3:14 pm • 2 0 • view
So what happens when the 30 days are up? Does Trump just declare a new emergency at the start of each month? I thought the Home Rule law was that after 30 days they would have to have Congress approve it. And it would seem like a "national emergency" of sandwich throwing could surely be challenged.
aug 27, 2025, 3:03 pm • 2 0 • view
Right, that's what I was going to say. The grand jury really just did its job here.
aug 27, 2025, 1:45 pm • 6 0 • view
Guess that’s a wrap….
aug 27, 2025, 3:54 pm • 6 0 • view
aug 27, 2025, 6:00 pm • 0 0 • view
That was my immediate thought. This was actually the grand jury doing precisely what the grand jury is supposed to do.
aug 27, 2025, 6:37 pm • 1 0 • view
Therefore not in fact jury nullification.
aug 27, 2025, 2:25 pm • 0 0 • view
Yeah this wasn't nullification so much as the grand jury looking at the evidence and the charge.
aug 27, 2025, 2:18 pm • 1 0 • view
When has that ever stopped them?
aug 27, 2025, 2:25 pm • 1 0 • view
You would think that DOJ would eventually get the message.
aug 27, 2025, 1:19 pm • 353 4 • view
They can't. The one thing a cult leader can never, EVER survive is admitting they were wrong. This extends to their subordinates in the cult hierarchy as well. It's also why they'll keep going after Kilmar Abrego Garcia until he's either deported to the Moon or dead.
aug 27, 2025, 1:52 pm • 19 0 • view
They can never, EVER admit that they were wrong about anything because their infallibility is that one wobbly piece at the bottom of their cultists' mental jenga towers.
aug 27, 2025, 1:54 pm • 14 0 • view
The message is, "Our actions may be invalid, but we'll still go out of our way to harass those who express dissent."
aug 27, 2025, 2:57 pm • 2 0 • view
Nope. Cruelty is their feature.
aug 27, 2025, 4:31 pm • 0 0 • view
not if their goal is to waste time and exhaust the people fighting them
aug 27, 2025, 1:20 pm • 484 6 • view
Defendants lie at home on the couch and eat delicious sandwiches during grand jury proceedings. They’re wasting their own resources and annoying judges with this. They just don’t know how this works. Misdemeanor assault would be slam dunk here.
aug 27, 2025, 3:11 pm • 1 0 • view
But a misdemeanor they might win doesn't send THE MESSAGE they want to send. So they get all dumb and swing for the fence. Luckily regular people on grand juries and the court of public opinion see through their bullshit.
aug 27, 2025, 10:16 pm • 0 0 • view
If these assholes think everyone will just get tired and give up, they need to look up the concept of “weaponized autism.” ASD Gang ain’t never gonna give. Were like fuckin’ Dr Strange against Dormammu.
aug 28, 2025, 3:25 am • 0 0 • view
Not prosecuting cases they couldn't win used to be one of their unwritten rules.🤷♂️
aug 27, 2025, 2:23 pm • 10 0 • view
aug 28, 2025, 5:05 pm • 2 1 • view
Spite is how I personally go on with this timeline
aug 27, 2025, 2:45 pm • 3 0 • view
That's exactly it - they can generate this shit with AI and watch you running around putting out fires for hardly any effort on their own part - it's not like they care about rules or laws, or court injunctions, or penalties for infraction. Who knew America owned so many brown shirts?
aug 27, 2025, 3:12 pm • 3 1 • view
I think the capacity of the oppressed for wasting time and exhausting the people fighting them is much greater.
aug 27, 2025, 2:41 pm • 6 0 • view
This cannot be understated. The process is the punishment. Sure, you aren't guilty of a crime, but fighting it might bankrupt you or cost you your job. They lose, but you have to rebuild your life, so they win in the end. And they can do it to anyone.
aug 27, 2025, 10:06 pm • 4 0 • view
…and to distract. They count on the base to never fact-check or follow-up once the red meat has been consumed. They are correct in that belief.😡
aug 27, 2025, 1:21 pm • 197 4 • view
Was it a red meat sandwich tho
aug 27, 2025, 1:28 pm • 2 0 • view
Salami. Not the ham sandwich that any grand jury would indict according to long standing legal thinking.
aug 27, 2025, 10:11 pm • 2 0 • view
Probably pinko.
aug 27, 2025, 1:33 pm • 2 0 • view
It got me thinking about something other than TACO. EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN
aug 27, 2025, 3:14 pm • 2 0 • view
Oh, the base is blaming the Dems as usual for being "soft on crime". I JUST thought of a comeback for the comment section for the MSN article on this not working. I should have said "not SOFT but maybe Sourdough or Wheat".
aug 27, 2025, 8:28 pm • 2 0 • view
Christians don’t question. It’s anathema to their evil religion.
aug 27, 2025, 3:40 pm • 2 0 • view
Hand, meet glove! 👋🧤
aug 27, 2025, 3:42 pm • 1 0 • view
who can afford meat any more
aug 27, 2025, 1:33 pm • 2 0 • view
that was literally how Tucker Carlson put his shows together! Start with a lie, then roll with it for the rest of the episode acting as if it was true. But then end of the show people are so worked up they don't think to even look at the first little bit.
aug 27, 2025, 1:24 pm • 161 3 • view
He did lose his DoJ job...
aug 27, 2025, 1:39 pm • 1 0 • view
It's a disinformation tactic I call the poison seed. Make a reasonable sounding argument but start with disinformation as your premise. People will tend to focus on the reasonable sounding argument and ignore the faulty premise it's based on.
aug 27, 2025, 6:35 pm • 2 0 • view
the Haitians are eating pets thing comes to mind
aug 27, 2025, 1:24 pm • 131 0 • view
Yes. Critical-thinking is not abundant…especially when all you care about is looking for someone/anyone to blame for whatever short-comings you may be experiencing.
aug 27, 2025, 1:26 pm • 70 0 • view
It seems to be about hurting their fellow humans. I have literally heard the glitchy, mouth-breather say: I love to see the liberals crying. It's a mental disorder folks and if you can't wrap your brain around it, that's good. It means you're not a sociopath.
aug 27, 2025, 1:42 pm • 90 2 • view
Conservative ideology and propaganda cannot operate without violence or a puppy to kick
aug 27, 2025, 3:26 pm • 32 2 • view
That’s not conservative ideology. That’s Christian ideology. Christianity is borne out of violent, brutal, torturous murder. They then eat the human flesh and drink the human blood, in celebration of the murdered one they feast upon.
aug 27, 2025, 3:44 pm • 11 0 • view
It’s the SOP.
aug 27, 2025, 3:34 pm • 0 0 • view
Have you gone on TRUTH SOCIAL? The stupidity is appalling. 🙄
aug 27, 2025, 2:24 pm • 0 0 • view
V-O-T-E-R F-R-A-U-D!
aug 27, 2025, 3:59 pm • 1 0 • view
That suggests they are competent. They clearly aren’t.
aug 27, 2025, 2:16 pm • 4 0 • view
They’re strategic…bumbling, but they still manage to fool them (although I’m guessing that the base is perfectly content with remaining willfully ignorant. Cognitive dissonance is uncomfortable, after all!!)
aug 27, 2025, 2:20 pm • 2 0 • view
And money. They like to waste our money.
aug 27, 2025, 2:32 pm • 5 0 • view
Yup, get a bullshit charge that won't stick... But you need a lawyer, have to deal with lost time at work or losing your job. You win the *court* case in the end, but they upended your life in the meantime. Lawfare and the Process Is The Punishment.
aug 27, 2025, 10:14 pm • 1 0 • view
The goal is to normalize the presence of armed police and traumatize the people into anxiety, fear and submission.
aug 27, 2025, 2:39 pm • 5 0 • view
They think certain people just existing is a crime, they won't.
aug 27, 2025, 3:00 pm • 0 0 • view
Unless you consider a ham sandwich a deadly weapon (I do)
aug 27, 2025, 4:36 pm • 1 0 • view
And they knew that going in. The idea is to intimidate.
aug 27, 2025, 2:59 pm • 2 1 • view
I came here to say that. It's not jury nullification if they didn't prove their case (or whatever you have to do in the case of a grand jury, non-lawyer here)
aug 27, 2025, 2:04 pm • 12 1 • view
Normal legal reasoning is that a "grand jury would indict a ham sandwich". Luckily this one was Salami. But can't do jury nullification in a trial if indictment-happy grand juries decide there was no crime committed and no reason for a trial. And this grand jury said there was no crime committed.
aug 27, 2025, 10:26 pm • 1 0 • view
The normal, if cynical, chatter about outcomes is "A grand jury would indict a ham sandwich." Statistically, I understand from chatter, the facts imply heavy reliance on prosecutorial lead(most grand juries vote as recommended by the prosecutor). But are most legit? What % are ham sandwich cases?
aug 27, 2025, 10:57 pm • 0 0 • view
A grand jury is asked if a case should go to trial. They vote Yes/No. It's extraordinarily rare for a grand jury not to hand down an indictment
aug 27, 2025, 4:30 pm • 1 0 • view
And with the common statement that "A grand jury will indict a "ham sandwich" makes this even more delicious and funny. A prosecutor has to absolutely blow it to not get a grand jury indictment.
aug 27, 2025, 10:28 pm • 4 0 • view
So you're saying there's a chance that they could charge the sandwich itself 😉
aug 27, 2025, 10:36 pm • 0 0 • view
LOL. Given this new DOJ, I would not be shocked! More likely, they charge the guy with a misdemeanor that doesn't require grand jury indictment under federal law and use that to make his life hell.
aug 27, 2025, 10:42 pm • 1 0 • view
I don't think that is actually true. Jury nullification happens, or can happen before the jury even determines if the prosecution has met it's burden, imo. [Non-lawyer here as well.]
aug 27, 2025, 2:09 pm • 1 0 • view
Yeah, this wasn't actually "jury nullification". This was just a grand jury saying the prosecutors were making a reach that was absurd. They just did their job and laughed at the attempted charge. Gran Jury be like...
aug 27, 2025, 10:32 pm • 2 0 • view
Maybe. "The jury's reasons may include the belief that the law itself is unjust,[4][5] ***that the prosecutor has misapplied the law in the defendant's case***...,[6]" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nu...
aug 28, 2025, 10:04 pm • 1 0 • view
There is that to make the case it might be actual jury nullification, but the prosecutors in DC just seem to have a hard time convincing the grand jury to indict anyone these days for lack of evidence, lying, or incompetence. Might just be a grand jury with a decent bullshit meter. Either works!
aug 28, 2025, 10:20 pm • 1 0 • view
"The jury's reasons may include the belief that the law itself is unjust,[4][5] that the prosecutor has misapplied the law in the defendant's case,[6] that the punishment for breaking the law is too harsh, or general frustrations with the criminal justice system. " en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nu...
aug 27, 2025, 2:15 pm • 3 0 • view
3 of the above reasons are independent of the prosecution meeting it's burden. imo
aug 27, 2025, 2:16 pm • 2 0 • view
What does this mean though: “Mr. Dunn is scheduled to appear next week in Federal District Court in Washington for a preliminary hearing where another magistrate judge, G. Michael Harvey, will determine if there is probable cause that a crime was committed during the sandwich-throwing incident.”
aug 27, 2025, 2:01 pm • 3 0 • view
It’s from NYT and is confusing. Why would he appear before magistrate to determine probable cause if grand jury has refused to indict? Does that suggest they are pursuing different charge now?
aug 27, 2025, 2:04 pm • 1 0 • view
No, PH is an alternate way of getting your charge, but the defense gets to participate and it’s public.
aug 27, 2025, 2:37 pm • 2 0 • view
Thanks for explanation. Is it typical to go to this step after grand jury refuses to indict? Who would’ve requested it - defense or DOJ? I know they only have 30 days to get indictment so wasn’t sure if this was a way for either side to get to resolution in lieu of going to grand jury again.
aug 27, 2025, 2:46 pm • 1 0 • view
I’m not a federal trial attorney so I don’t know how typical this is there, sorry! It’s unusual for the GJ to no-bill in the first place, but I don’t know usual next steps. The preliminary hearing was already set as a placeholder before DOJ went to the grand jury.
aug 27, 2025, 2:59 pm • 1 0 • view
Thanks so much. Not a lawyer, but I feel like this admin is giving those of us paying attention an informal legal education on the fly. I’m really grateful to you & other lawyers on Bluesky who explain things to the rest of us.
aug 27, 2025, 3:09 pm • 1 0 • view
So in other words it absolutely was not nullification, in fact the exact opposite and the grand jury doing its job
aug 27, 2025, 2:15 pm • 4 0 • view
Nullification is a jury's job.
aug 27, 2025, 4:15 pm • 1 0 • view
Yes, and it worked out great in the Civil Rights Era South
aug 28, 2025, 1:30 am • 0 0 • view
Clearly, the plates were sandwich-rated! It wasn't fighting words, it was a legitimate response to the fighting words of placing MRAPS in front of Union Station while threatening to feed people to alligators.
aug 27, 2025, 3:39 pm • 2 0 • view
Wait is he just gonna walk cuz they overcharged like lunatics? Could something that wonderful actually happen?
aug 30, 2025, 5:17 pm • 0 0 • view
Their goal is to instill fear
aug 27, 2025, 2:29 pm • 2 0 • view
right, no way and what would john jones say? "jurors judges of law and fact" comes w some downsides, I expect, but we may be heading in that direction quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo2/A876...
aug 27, 2025, 2:31 pm • 0 0 • view
If the facts didn't meet the threshold for a felony, I'm not sure it's technically nullification.
aug 27, 2025, 6:18 pm • 2 0 • view
And we will never know.
aug 27, 2025, 6:19 pm • 1 0 • view
Yet they still tried
aug 27, 2025, 1:24 pm • 4 1 • view
Clearly sir, you have never had to remove a banana pepper from your eye. And what if that weapon of mass deliciousness had been tuna salad? Anaphylactic shock!
aug 27, 2025, 6:58 pm • 1 0 • view
I guess that means it wasn't toasted.
aug 28, 2025, 11:09 am • 2 0 • view
If only it was a little heavier on cheese.
aug 27, 2025, 5:05 pm • 2 0 • view
Felony? 🤣 They can barely get a misdemeanor out of this. No jury is going to buy a cop in full tactical gear was scared of a sandwich. Defense just has to play a clip of children throwing tomatoes at the La Tomatina festival in Spain and ask if that's also a crime. The horror!
aug 27, 2025, 2:50 pm • 2 0 • view
It only BARELY meets the misdemeanor requirement, and you REALLY have to stretch it for that. It's more about the cop and DOJ being butthurt than an actual crime, but that's where we are these days.
aug 27, 2025, 3:24 pm • 8 0 • view
The prosecutors need to be terminated/fired they failed to corrupt the law enough but wasted significant city resources and funds in a frivolous prosecution for personal gain.
aug 27, 2025, 3:18 pm • 1 0 • view
Somehow this hasn't led to dear leader complaining about grand juries. I can't wait until *that starts*.
aug 27, 2025, 1:26 pm • 5 0 • view
Surprised it hasn’t already started, they failed to secure many (any?) indictments for arrests during the LA protests.
aug 27, 2025, 3:18 pm • 2 0 • view
I guess the grand jury figures a hero ain't nuthin' but a sandwich.
aug 27, 2025, 4:32 pm • 6 1 • view
Arrested still shows on his record, correct? They are just trying to crush people. Ruin them financially. I can just imagine the death threats this poor man is getting. 🤢
aug 27, 2025, 7:25 pm • 1 0 • view
He got away with assault with a deli weapon.
aug 27, 2025, 8:32 pm • 4 0 • view
A competent prosecutor could have indicted THE SANDWICH. 🤣
aug 27, 2025, 4:15 pm • 6 2 • view
Im certain they wanted to bring the sandwich maker in as an accessory
aug 27, 2025, 6:19 pm • 1 0 • view
You got my mouth watering for Grey Poupon! 😛 🥪
aug 27, 2025, 6:37 pm • 3 0 • view
aug 27, 2025, 2:14 pm • 8 1 • view
My brain first read the yellow sign as "don't bread on me," and now I kinda want to make that sign.
aug 27, 2025, 2:18 pm • 5 0 • view
i though it should say “EAT ME”
aug 28, 2025, 4:01 am • 2 0 • view
I guess you can’t indict a ham sandwich, after all.
aug 27, 2025, 2:27 pm • 10 0 • view
Maybe they'd have better luck indicting the actual sandwich. 🤣
aug 27, 2025, 4:03 pm • 4 0 • view
Where’s the beef?
aug 27, 2025, 1:15 pm • 2 0 • view
Imagine a half million of us at the white house. With sandwiches. Extra mayo.
aug 27, 2025, 3:52 pm • 10 0 • view
and now maybe he should file a lawsuit for unjustified dismissal
aug 27, 2025, 5:32 pm • 3 0 • view
They can indict a ham sandwich, but not a submarine sandwich
aug 27, 2025, 3:27 pm • 8 0 • view
bsky.app/profile/funm...
aug 27, 2025, 3:30 pm • 8 1 • view
👊🇺🇸🥪
aug 27, 2025, 2:04 pm • 7 1 • view
Love it! 😂😂😂
aug 27, 2025, 2:54 pm • 2 0 • view
Outcome would have been different if the sandwich had sharp cheddar
aug 27, 2025, 2:19 pm • 5 0 • view
Ironically, the prosecutor might have better luck against a ham sandwich.
aug 27, 2025, 3:46 pm • 4 0 • view
*alleged federal agent
aug 27, 2025, 7:47 pm • 1 0 • view
Next I want to see grand juries go full Rockwell Int’l and start issuing presentments against officials, just to make everyone’s procedural lives hell. (Make the Assize of Clarendon Great Again!)
aug 27, 2025, 6:03 pm • 1 0 • view
📌
aug 27, 2025, 1:24 pm • 1 0 • view
Wait, what? The case of the flying sub sammich went nowhere?! 🤣
aug 27, 2025, 3:55 pm • 3 0 • view
They thought it was in the baguette, but they ended up getting rolled. How rye.
aug 27, 2025, 3:43 pm • 5 0 • view
I guess the sandwich wasn't ham.
aug 27, 2025, 3:58 pm • 5 0 • view
So now we know we can toss sandwiches at ICE & troops as protest. A fun event would be say a couple hundred sandwiches flying everywhere…😂😂😂
aug 27, 2025, 2:24 pm • 9 0 • view
More practical in the era of the $5 Footlong. Is there any appreciable difference in the target's pain or indignity if I use a 6" sub instead?
aug 28, 2025, 6:33 pm • 1 0 • view
At least with a meatball sub it will inflict laundry damage…a turkey 6” may not unless you go heavy on the mayo & mustards
aug 28, 2025, 9:03 pm • 0 0 • view
What if we all show up and throw sandwiches 🤷🏽♀️
aug 27, 2025, 2:36 pm • 0 0 • view
aug 27, 2025, 2:19 pm • 2 0 • view
Common sense prevailed.
aug 27, 2025, 2:40 pm • 2 0 • view
What? The grand jury says not...
aug 28, 2025, 8:26 am • 1 0 • view
🤭
aug 27, 2025, 2:59 pm • 5 0 • view
Apparently you CAN’T get a grand jury indictment on a ham sandwich. 🤷🏻♀️
aug 28, 2025, 9:17 pm • 0 0 • view
Oops!
aug 27, 2025, 3:31 pm • 3 0 • view
While any decent prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich, this group of clowns can’t indict a subway sandwich.
aug 27, 2025, 2:16 pm • 2 0 • view
Guns are real weapons not a sandwich! Results of a stupid, silly, incompetent mess of a💩Republican Administration trying to do jobs they are unqualified for following a corrupt, racist, old, senile 👿Felon whose mind is in a fantasy world & hears conversations in his dreams he thinks are real!🤬
aug 28, 2025, 12:19 am • 4 0 • view
Awesome!
aug 27, 2025, 2:38 pm • 2 0 • view
A smart prosecutor knows what to ask a grand jury. Jeanine Pirro knows television and thinks you can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich.
aug 27, 2025, 10:47 pm • 2 0 • view
Ooh! We can throw sandwiches!!! 😂
aug 27, 2025, 2:15 pm • 3 0 • view
Lettuce be grateful for this. It’s definitely something to be relished. The current DOJ is too stupid to ketchup. They need a swift kick in the buns.
aug 27, 2025, 3:10 pm • 15 0 • view
Wasted taxpayer dollars
aug 27, 2025, 2:48 pm • 1 0 • view
😂😂😂😂 “Assault with a deadly sandwich…” The officer… “It’s wrapping hit me in the chest and I’m gluten intolerant.”
aug 27, 2025, 3:01 pm • 3 0 • view
Tell them “we all despise you” without saying “We all despise you.” Also, we the people should start carrying a sandwich with us at all times.
aug 27, 2025, 3:38 pm • 4 0 • view
peanut butter jelly time :)
aug 28, 2025, 4:08 am • 2 0 • view
Yay!
aug 27, 2025, 3:49 pm • 5 0 • view
Greatest Sandwich Hunt in History!
aug 27, 2025, 5:33 pm • 3 0 • view
aug 27, 2025, 5:16 pm • 6 2 • view
aug 27, 2025, 4:06 pm • 7 2 • view
And that’s no bologna.
aug 28, 2025, 3:29 am • 1 0 • view
“RADICAL JURISTS SHOULD NOT BE DICTATING WHO IS GUILTY OF BLAH BLAH BLAH” Waiting for it.
aug 27, 2025, 1:26 pm • 4 0 • view
A sandwich is not typically a lethal weapon, unless he was hoping the guy he threw it at was going to eat it and choke
aug 27, 2025, 4:10 pm • 3 0 • view
aug 27, 2025, 1:57 pm • 4 1 • view
We are at the point where if we are called to serve on a jury, we should all participate in jury nullification of every charge brought by MAGA affiliated practice. www.law.cornell.edu/wex/jury_nul...
aug 27, 2025, 2:46 pm • 34 6 • view
Hopefully, more smart Americans will stop trying to get out of jury duty.
aug 27, 2025, 5:43 pm • 11 0 • view
The system frankly sucks. The stipend isn't even enough to cover lunch and most companies won't pay for your time serving. The last time I was called I spent three days doing absolutely nothing.
aug 27, 2025, 5:49 pm • 9 0 • view
I know that not everyone can do it. I’ve been called several times, working for different employers. They all paid for my time. Obviously, it’s not fun. Lots of things worth doing are not fun.
aug 27, 2025, 5:53 pm • 6 0 • view
In Connecticut the state requires employers to grant (unpaid) time off and pays jurors $50/day. That's enough to cover lunch *and* parking. 😬
aug 28, 2025, 6:29 pm • 2 0 • view
Sure. And minimum wage in California is $15. But that doesn’t mean that’s all my employer pays me.
aug 28, 2025, 6:59 pm • 1 0 • view
Yeah. Hence the grimace.
aug 29, 2025, 12:28 am • 1 0 • view
And do not mention nullification as a motive, at all. Just assert there was not enough evidence that was credible.
aug 27, 2025, 11:23 pm • 1 0 • view
Public is saying — get serious - quit wasting our time and $ on this fear show
aug 27, 2025, 4:13 pm • 4 0 • view
I had a Subway Meatball Sub with Provolone cheese and sliced tomatoes to celebrate the auspicious occasion.
aug 27, 2025, 11:00 pm • 5 0 • view
He will always be a "Hero" to me
aug 27, 2025, 3:01 pm • 9 0 • view
That whole sandwich indictment was a bunch of baloney to begin with!
aug 27, 2025, 1:58 pm • 12 1 • view
So you can "indict a ham sandwich" but not a guy for throwing one. Good to know!
aug 27, 2025, 4:27 pm • 3 0 • view
Lmao
aug 27, 2025, 1:50 pm • 2 0 • view
Legal question: Is it nullification? I thought nullification was when a jury knows the person is guilty but acquits anyhow. I think what happened here is that the evidence didn't meet the charge. Is that also considered nullification? Thanks!
aug 27, 2025, 6:12 pm • 82 9 • view
Nothing is being nullified. Salami subs are trickier to indict than ham sandwiches. Perhaps Stephen Miller can testify about the officer's alpha level that might give rise to a felony charge
aug 28, 2025, 3:43 am • 0 0 • view
I’ve always thought of it as the prosecutor asking the GJ to agree that an arrested person should be charged as presented. There are a variety of reasons they might disagree, including distinguishing a food fight from assault with a deadly weapon.
aug 27, 2025, 8:39 pm • 2 0 • view
I think it’s in the eye of the beholder. I don’t think it met the criteria for a felony, which wouldn’t be nullification per se, but we’ll never know if it was that and a general resistance to the takeover or not. Though we have another no bill from a July incidence that might be another data point.
aug 27, 2025, 6:14 pm • 42 3 • view
Just so I understand your legal advice is I can walk up to police officers and throw sandwiches at them??? I feel like if that is not a law it should be how can police do their job if they have people throwing sandwiches at them all day? Is it all foods or just sandwiches that are exempt?
aug 28, 2025, 6:55 am • 0 0 • view
can I throw gobstoppers at them? Or watermelons from the roof? In australia once a group of aboriginal women attacked a police officer with frozen kangaroo tails, but they weren't charged because they did not find the weapon they allegedly attacked with (it was delicious).
aug 28, 2025, 6:56 am • 0 0 • view
aug 28, 2025, 6:59 am • 1 0 • view
I mean, vs the usual “will indict a ham sandwich” behavior of grand juries—although I think this might emphasize that the usual behavior of grand juries is based on somewhat sane charges
aug 27, 2025, 6:16 pm • 16 0 • view
Popehat says the felony charge should have been easy because there was clear physical contact. No? He wonders if the “dipshits” decided to go with aggravated.
aug 27, 2025, 6:40 pm • 0 1 • view
Even if it doesn't meet the criteria, it's entirely possible the jury didn't bother to consider that and just said "this is stupid and I got pulled into jury duty for this crap?"
aug 28, 2025, 2:50 pm • 2 0 • view
They expect DOJ to spend resources on real crimes. If I was a juror that's how I'd feel - like we've ALL been victims of more serious crimes than that without any support from any justice system.
aug 27, 2025, 6:27 pm • 2 1 • view
I think it might be generate resistance to this BS. Wasn’t it in Georgia or somewhere where they started out with a felony moved down to a lesser charge and lost that three times
aug 27, 2025, 9:14 pm • 1 1 • view
Jury nullification is when a jury agrees that the facts support conviction, but by own biases and opinions on the facts the jury chooses not to convict. It is hard to prove, and I'm pretty sure it doesn't apply to grand juries for indictments as jeopardy is not attached. Still, calling it (+)
aug 27, 2025, 9:43 pm • 0 1 • view
(+) nullification implies that the grand jury in this case may have made their decision based on opinion rather than the facts present. Trump, his sycophants, and anyone else against this decision can say this was 'nullification' and claim miscarriage of justice, when that is simply not the case.(+)
aug 27, 2025, 9:43 pm • 0 0 • view
(+) So don't call it nullification, you only help do Trump's work. Not that he needs help making shit up, but still.
aug 27, 2025, 9:43 pm • 1 0 • view
You have a more measured reply from Anthony already, but I read his all-caps exclamation point label as tongue-in-cheek. However if the regime continues to abuse it prosecuting power, we may well see nullification for real.
aug 27, 2025, 7:51 pm • 0 0 • view
So, jury nullification is generally (illegally in most jurisdictions) argued by the defendant’s attorney in a trial in front of a petite jury. Grand jury proceedings don’t allow for arguments by the defense counsel. Therefore, you can never have jury nullification in a grand jury.
aug 29, 2025, 2:25 am • 3 0 • view
That’s not entirely accurate. scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcont...
aug 29, 2025, 2:31 am • 6 1 • view
I don't think so. You'd have to know the evidence they were presented with but I doubt it satisfied all the elements of a serious charge.
aug 27, 2025, 9:58 pm • 0 0 • view
its not "nullification" in the classic sense. But Grand Juries usually comply with the wishes of the prosecutors presenting the "evidence" to them. But Grand Juries are now clearly rebelling against the Trump regime's abuse of power -- that they are being skeptical of claims being made.
aug 27, 2025, 7:41 pm • 0 0 • view
If the sandwich hit (an illegal occupier) you must acquit! Soft foods against body armor is no crime in these “circumstances.” It is an expected occupational hazard. They put MRAPs in front of Union Station while gator-baiting. Are there IEDs in DC? No, there is creative non-violent resistance.
aug 28, 2025, 2:55 am • 0 0 • view
I too thought that was an odd word choice. Why is the NYT tiptoeing around? What are they afraid of??
aug 27, 2025, 8:46 pm • 0 0 • view
I think this is mostly a joke because the felony charge here is absurd, but a grand jury could also just refuse to indict because it supported the actions of the accused. There is no way to know the reason of a particular juror or jury. Note also standard for indict vs convict.
aug 27, 2025, 6:15 pm • 5 1 • view
The fifth amendment gotta love it
aug 27, 2025, 1:20 pm • 52 0 • view
It was the fifth condiment that won it.
aug 27, 2025, 3:05 pm • 70 0 • view
That's the one about Search & Caesar Dressing, right? I'm not required to season myself.
aug 27, 2025, 3:34 pm • 41 1 • view
Didn't Bruce Willis star in that flick?
aug 27, 2025, 4:03 pm • 2 0 • view
You win!
aug 27, 2025, 4:05 pm • 1 0 • view
I'm just following everyone else's lead - wittiest comment thread ever
aug 27, 2025, 4:06 pm • 0 0 • view
TBH anytime the "government" is defeated by a sandwich is a great time to be alive.
aug 27, 2025, 8:10 pm • 1 0 • view
You love to see it.
aug 27, 2025, 4:54 pm • 3 0 • view
💙👍
aug 27, 2025, 5:46 pm • 1 0 • view
They need to hand him a 10 dollar dry cleaning bill and leave him the fuck alone.
aug 27, 2025, 1:48 pm • 12 0 • view
The charges? Didn’t stick due to no mayo or ketchup..
aug 27, 2025, 5:19 pm • 3 0 • view
aug 27, 2025, 6:01 pm • 2 0 • view
Though she is a bit of a ham, her sandwich is white bread full of baloney.
aug 27, 2025, 3:16 pm • 2 0 • view
Wouldn't be he first sandwich situation. They didn't call her "Meat & Cheese" in law school for nothin'
aug 27, 2025, 2:04 pm • 14 0 • view
but some white bread nazi still probably stuffed her...
aug 27, 2025, 2:45 pm • 9 0 • view
Except none of the meat at Subway is spit-roasted. 😲
aug 28, 2025, 6:26 pm • 0 0 • view
I'd prefer the sandwich to that ugly bitch.
aug 27, 2025, 9:01 pm • 0 0 • view
As someone who served on more than one jury during my days in DC. this should be absolutely fucking hysterical. DC will have none of it. Pirro will be strapping on her tiger printed bib and full throating the wine bong for Labor Day!
aug 27, 2025, 2:06 pm • 8 0 • view
Why in the name of justice are they wasting time and money on this??????????
aug 27, 2025, 4:07 pm • 3 0 • view
😁
aug 27, 2025, 3:38 pm • 3 0 • view
It started in LA. bsky.app/profile/lemo...
aug 27, 2025, 2:43 pm • 5 0 • view
"We the people . . ."
aug 27, 2025, 10:59 pm • 1 0 • view
So not every Grand Jury will indict a Ham Sandwich.
aug 27, 2025, 11:49 pm • 4 0 • view
So... what you're saying is. Its legal to throw sandwiches at ICE?
aug 27, 2025, 9:16 pm • 5 0 • view
(this post is obviously a joke please do not assault federal officers)
aug 27, 2025, 11:53 pm • 1 0 • view
The fact that they seriously thought anyone would convict a man for throwing a sandwich shows how far out of touch Trumps administration is.
aug 27, 2025, 2:01 pm • 2 0 • view
This is the way.
aug 27, 2025, 3:34 pm • 4 0 • view
This case had no mustard to begin with. It's a prime example of what is wrong in this country Back in the day, that cop would've just wiped the mayo off of his shirt and dismissed it as something that "comes with the job". What's next, you can't look cross-eyed at a cop? What a bunch of snowflakes
aug 27, 2025, 1:37 pm • 10 0 • view
Wah, wah.😁
aug 27, 2025, 1:55 pm • 0 0 • view
But, but, but…. Ham sandwich?
aug 27, 2025, 3:08 pm • 4 0 • view
I guess it wasn't a 'ham sandwich' then? If someone else posted this theme...all I can say, is great minds think alike.
aug 27, 2025, 2:48 pm • 2 0 • view
What an absolute waste of taxpayer $$$
aug 27, 2025, 3:19 pm • 5 0 • view
It’s safe to return to Subway!! Get 25% off on the Subway Bandit Sandwich special
aug 27, 2025, 3:10 pm • 4 0 • view
Waste our time and money.
aug 27, 2025, 3:40 pm • 5 0 • view
Fascist kakistocracy.
aug 27, 2025, 3:27 pm • 4 0 • view
judge to prosecutor: "how could i possibly justify indicting this man when you stand before me tossing salad?"
aug 27, 2025, 3:36 pm • 3 0 • view
We are all grateful to you Sean. Before he threw the sandwich, the complaint asserts, Mr. Dunn stood within inches of the officer, calling him and his colleagues “fascists” and shouting, “I don’t want you in my city!”
aug 27, 2025, 2:37 pm • 10 2 • view
I think what everyone is glossing over is that a good sandwich was lost in this battle
aug 27, 2025, 1:20 pm • 46 0 • view
It was a Subway sandwich, so I think we can consider it an acceptable sacrifice.
aug 27, 2025, 1:21 pm • 77 0 • view
Oh no you didn't!!! 😂 🤣😂🤣
aug 27, 2025, 4:03 pm • 2 0 • view
fair enough
aug 27, 2025, 1:33 pm • 15 0 • view
A Jersey Mike would have been a hate crime.
aug 28, 2025, 4:36 am • 3 0 • view
What legendary soothsayer predicted this would happen? Quiznostradamus.
aug 28, 2025, 6:27 pm • 3 0 • view
He kept the soft cookie, though.
aug 27, 2025, 3:07 pm • 1 0 • view
Wondering what kind it was
aug 27, 2025, 5:17 pm • 0 0 • view
It's not like it was a Jersey Mike's sub or something like that. It's just Subway.
aug 27, 2025, 3:30 pm • 1 0 • view
True, you’re not throwing your sandwich if its Mike’s way. I said it was a good sandwich, not a great sandwich.
aug 27, 2025, 3:35 pm • 1 0 • view
That's true. I should be paying closer attention to nuance.
aug 27, 2025, 3:36 pm • 1 0 • view
aug 27, 2025, 3:17 pm • 21 2 • view
But sandwich thrower lost his job
aug 27, 2025, 5:20 pm • 3 0 • view
The real crime was buying a Subway sandwich.
aug 27, 2025, 3:09 pm • 5 0 • view
wat " defendants are not allowed to have their lawyers in the room as evidence is presented."
aug 27, 2025, 1:47 pm • 2 0 • view
That's how grand juries have always operated. Defendants have also always been allowed to be excused to consult with their attorneys as same wait outside the grand jury chambers.
aug 27, 2025, 1:51 pm • 3 0 • view
thanks
aug 27, 2025, 1:53 pm • 0 0 • view
To elaborate, according to what I found on web search, grand jury proceedings are significantly different from jury trials, in that the role of the grand jury - to consider the evidence presented by the prosecution and determine if probable cause exists for indictment - is sharply distinct...
aug 27, 2025, 1:55 pm • 3 0 • view
...from the role of the trial jury, which is to hear the arguments of both the prosecution and the defense & to determine if the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crime of which they are accused.
aug 27, 2025, 1:55 pm • 2 0 • view
can't indict a ham sandwich thrower
aug 27, 2025, 2:06 pm • 3 0 • view
Womp womp. Losers gonna lose
aug 27, 2025, 7:58 pm • 1 0 • view
This is NOT nullification because there was no felony to begin with. Jury made the right call here. They didn't nullify anything. Nullification would have been if there WAS a felony and they dismissed it.
aug 28, 2025, 12:29 pm • 0 0 • view
Does this mean we can all get subs for throwing? Will subway sell use expired bread at a discount tightly wrapped for throwing? Loosely wrapped with slippery condiments?
aug 27, 2025, 2:33 pm • 2 0 • view
Laughed out of court.
aug 27, 2025, 8:41 pm • 4 0 • view
Assault with a deadly sandwich.. Trump supporters are soooo painfully stupid. And it's called a food fight with one of them unarmed.
aug 27, 2025, 3:59 pm • 2 0 • view
What a travesty of justice! I mean what’s the guy going to do next, use a squirt gun! Arrest anyone who thinks ICE is good!
aug 27, 2025, 2:17 pm • 2 0 • view
@stephaniemiller.bsky.social @jodyhamilton.bsky.social @sgvoices4change.bsky.social @bluegirlsrule.bsky.social @arlenerios.bsky.social @transarmy.org @translash.org
aug 27, 2025, 1:30 pm • 6 1 • view
We found it folks! The event where they couldn’t actually indict the ham sandwich!
aug 27, 2025, 1:22 pm • 133 10 • view
you win
aug 27, 2025, 1:40 pm • 19 0 • view
bsky.app/profile/prof...
aug 28, 2025, 12:57 am • 2 0 • view
Yes!
aug 27, 2025, 2:41 pm • 2 0 • view
A jury just doing their job! Take jury duty seriously to do this when necessary! Laid out perfectly in the great book by Paul Butler thenewpress.org/books/lets-g...
aug 27, 2025, 2:01 pm • 4 1 • view
aug 27, 2025, 3:17 pm • 4 0 • view
Well that's a wrap
aug 27, 2025, 8:41 pm • 4 0 • view
And the Trump administration loses in court...AGAIN!
aug 27, 2025, 1:36 pm • 0 0 • view
I will need to stock up on Sub sandwiches when heading out to our next protest.
aug 27, 2025, 1:49 pm • 7 0 • view
I like the way you think! bsky.app/profile/5cal...
sep 1, 2025, 4:47 am • 0 0 • view
Felonious BLT remains free!
aug 27, 2025, 2:20 pm • 14 0 • view
“Felonious BLT!”
aug 27, 2025, 2:26 pm • 7 0 • view
Chris Christie's rapper name.
aug 28, 2025, 6:31 pm • 1 0 • view
Or as another person pointed out, he beat the wrap! 😂
aug 27, 2025, 2:33 pm • 1 0 • view
Was the evidence eaten or something?
aug 27, 2025, 4:06 pm • 3 0 • view
Yay! Fuck Pam Bondi for even trying.
aug 27, 2025, 2:07 pm • 12 0 • view
I wouldn't with DJT's dick.
aug 28, 2025, 6:31 pm • 0 0 • view
Bondi’s got egg(salad) all over her face!
aug 27, 2025, 2:29 pm • 7 0 • view
I'm sure all the MAGA supporters will accuse the grand jury of being lazy and just loafing around.
aug 27, 2025, 1:52 pm • 12 0 • view
Incoming Exec Order: Deranged Donnie discharges current DC Grand Jury and issues edict that he will appoint the new handpicked members of all future DC Grand Juries so they aren’t soft on crime. After all, he is the “President” and can do what he wants
aug 27, 2025, 3:22 pm • 2 0 • view
Deport the sandwich
aug 27, 2025, 4:56 pm • 4 0 • view
🥪 wins!!!
aug 27, 2025, 1:39 pm • 7 0 • view
you hate to see it!
aug 27, 2025, 2:57 pm • 1 0 • view
Normalize throwing sandwiches
aug 27, 2025, 3:45 pm • 3 0 • view
ICE should feel lucky that the worst thing that happened is a sandwich was thrown. They deserve much worse.
aug 27, 2025, 2:11 pm • 5 0 • view
I feel it's more of a criminal offense on behalf of fans of sammiches. They are NOT weapons! Then again, as a conscientious objector, I'd prefer food fights over gun fights. Still. It's a sacrilege!
aug 27, 2025, 2:03 pm • 80 11 • view
Deliciously diabolical.
aug 28, 2025, 4:36 am • 1 0 • view
No Sammich Control. They will have to pry my sub from my cold dead hands!
aug 28, 2025, 4:14 am • 0 0 • view
Dude! You used my joke! 🙂
aug 27, 2025, 3:33 pm • 8 0 • view
You mean the meme? Then yes. We do that. Laurie Anderson is fond of saying, "Language is a virus" and memes are a part of that disease. =)
aug 27, 2025, 2:55 pm • 7 0 • view
Paradise is exactly like where I am right now, only much, much better. 🙂
aug 28, 2025, 12:23 am • 3 0 • view
I was talking to a friend. I said, "I wanted you. I was looking for you, but I couldn't find you." She said, "Hey! You talking to me? Or are you just writing another one of those insipid tweets of yours?"
aug 28, 2025, 12:10 am • 3 0 • view
aug 27, 2025, 9:57 pm • 1 0 • view
All hail the sandwich! Score: Sandwich 1 Indictment 0
aug 27, 2025, 2:53 pm • 14 3 • view
I your response and knew I must follow this person… then I saw I already do…
aug 27, 2025, 3:01 pm • 7 0 • view
We equals 😄💙🌺💙
aug 27, 2025, 3:07 pm • 5 0 • view
Big day for those believing in the right to carry and use a sandwich.
aug 27, 2025, 3:15 pm • 5 0 • view
Sadly, they say that Bondi will charge him with a misdemeanor because that doesn't take a GJ indictment. If they do and it goes to trial I'm hoping the jury does some nullification of its own.
aug 27, 2025, 3:01 pm • 4 1 • view
I wonder if they will try to find another grand jury to present to. It shows that the old saying that any decent prosecutor could indite a ham sandwich
aug 27, 2025, 2:48 pm • 2 0 • view
In a world full of "stupid shit", this has got to be among the top 10.
aug 27, 2025, 2:15 pm • 6 0 • view
These incompetent boobs would be hilarious if they weren’t dangerous
aug 27, 2025, 3:57 pm • 5 0 • view
This is the solidarity we need
aug 27, 2025, 3:43 pm • 1 0 • view
So you can’t indict a ham sandwich after all?!!!
aug 27, 2025, 1:55 pm • 2 0 • view
Wasn't he just offering to share his sandwich?
aug 27, 2025, 2:33 pm • 4 0 • view
Now that we know we can use sandwiches against tyranny, we can all start carrying this handy-dandy Subway Sandwich Cannon: youtu.be/uNJ5MftJC-0?...
aug 27, 2025, 5:24 pm • 2 0 • view
Oh good. Fuck federal agents
aug 27, 2025, 11:54 pm • 1 0 • view
This Administration has the most waste and fraud then anything DOGE cut on lies and misinformation. They are spending whores! And the media? Hello media remember the Epstein files cover up going on? Media where is the coverage on BROWN STAINS health. You had no problem going after Biden relentlessly
aug 27, 2025, 1:29 pm • 2 0 • view
I thought you could indict a ham sandwich
aug 27, 2025, 3:04 pm • 6 0 • view
aug 27, 2025, 1:23 pm • 17 0 • view
aug 27, 2025, 6:28 pm • 1 0 • view
A very big FU to the “you can indict a ham sandwich” crowd
aug 27, 2025, 3:20 pm • 4 0 • view
lol. Fuck you Pirro.
aug 27, 2025, 2:19 pm • 2 0 • view
🥪✊
aug 27, 2025, 4:47 pm • 4 1 • view
Headline should be: sandwich guy beats the wrap
aug 27, 2025, 3:21 pm • 7 0 • view
Not “nullification” unless the evidence didn’t support the legal charge.
aug 27, 2025, 7:03 pm • 1 0 • view
We are living in a circus tent.
aug 27, 2025, 7:31 pm • 3 0 • view
aug 27, 2025, 1:54 pm • 121 12 • view
Wanted it to go to trial. SNL hoot of the century.
aug 27, 2025, 2:54 pm • 1 0 • view
Cannot nullify with a grand jury, just fail to indict
aug 27, 2025, 4:51 pm • 7 0 • view
As an attorney for many incarcerated ham sandwiches, I believe you're missing the point.
aug 27, 2025, 7:00 pm • 5 0 • view
Forgive my pedantry, I am obviously happy the indictment wasn’t handed issued. Nullification and failing to indict are sufficiently different in my mind so as not to conflate the two. That’s all.
aug 27, 2025, 7:06 pm • 1 0 • view
There's no question about what happened, the act was plainly assault, and it was recorded. That seems sufficiently nullification-y to me.
aug 27, 2025, 7:18 pm • 1 0 • view
But it certainly wasn’t felony assault, right? I mean the felony is the trumped up bit. He could still catch a misdemeanor charge, right?
aug 27, 2025, 7:25 pm • 1 0 • view
This is kind of a parable about the hazards of overcharging.
aug 28, 2025, 6:35 pm • 2 0 • view
Part of a series of parables about the dangers of staffing DOJ with unrepentant assclowns.
aug 28, 2025, 9:07 pm • 2 0 • view
It's as well it wasn't a club sandwich. That might count as a salt.
aug 27, 2025, 3:28 pm • 5 0 • view
this is a good one
aug 27, 2025, 10:57 pm • 1 0 • view
I do hope the sandwich thrower has had their sandwich reimbursed
aug 27, 2025, 11:56 pm • 2 0 • view
Because it’s so stupid.
aug 27, 2025, 3:24 pm • 4 0 • view
Right on! My most memorable case from my stint on grand jury was an ass pressing charges against a person who had just clapped back at him being an asshole. By shooting it down as a grand jury we saved taxpayer dollars litigating a stupid case, and saved the guy who was just standing up for himself
aug 27, 2025, 4:19 pm • 4 0 • view
It must have been a veggie I guess 🤷♂️😂
aug 27, 2025, 2:42 pm • 0 0 • view
aug 27, 2025, 4:13 pm • 3 2 • view
Just look at the meatballs guarding those sandwiches.
aug 27, 2025, 5:04 pm • 3 0 • view
Sandwichman - Superhero!
aug 27, 2025, 5:39 pm • 3 0 • view
And they say you can get a Grand Jury to indict a ham sandwich.
aug 27, 2025, 8:27 pm • 2 0 • view
Let’s get our sandwich game on (tacos work too).
aug 27, 2025, 2:41 pm • 0 0 • view
Comedy is legal again
aug 27, 2025, 3:56 pm • 6 0 • view
This is how we fight back. We, the People, can choose who gets punished and for why. This is what Trump didn't understand when he faced his own indictments. They're not politically motivated, they are brought by the people, and in this case, the people said no
aug 27, 2025, 2:00 pm • 2 0 • view
Happens when the only victim here is the sub.
aug 27, 2025, 2:11 pm • 2 0 • view
there’s a joke about indicting a ham sandwich somewhere here
aug 27, 2025, 3:08 pm • 6 0 • view
The Hoagies of Freedom!
aug 27, 2025, 2:09 pm • 3 2 • view
👏👏🥳🥳
aug 27, 2025, 4:10 pm • 2 0 • view
"Submarine Sandwish"
aug 27, 2025, 5:43 pm • 3 0 • view
Guess they couldn't indict the ham sandwich...
aug 27, 2025, 6:11 pm • 4 0 • view
It was tuna. 🤷
aug 27, 2025, 6:59 pm • 1 0 • view
There's a version for throwing at Trump. It's called the Apprentice. No salami, roast beef or ham. It's 100% baloney.
aug 27, 2025, 4:36 pm • 4 3 • view
So I guess the aphorism that "you can indict a ham sandwich" doesn't always apply.
aug 27, 2025, 4:30 pm • 5 0 • view
Surreal. How did something this ludicrous ever get to a court?
aug 27, 2025, 3:06 pm • 5 0 • view
The only real surprise here is they went to the Grand jury. I really thought they would have dropped charges before then.
aug 27, 2025, 2:10 pm • 2 0 • view
To be fair though. What a waste of a hot dog.
aug 27, 2025, 1:18 pm • 5 0 • view
Frivolous.
aug 27, 2025, 2:04 pm • 8 0 • view
Was the Federal Agent wearing his Sandwich Proof Kevlar vest?
aug 27, 2025, 2:13 pm • 2 0 • view
Love to see it
aug 27, 2025, 2:45 pm • 2 0 • view
All caps? You didn’t have to put so much mustard on it. 😉
aug 27, 2025, 3:37 pm • 3 0 • view
bsky.app/profile/abdo...
aug 27, 2025, 3:00 pm • 3 0 • view
I don’t suppose throwing a sandwich will do.
aug 27, 2025, 3:19 pm • 3 0 • view
bsky.app/profile/abdo...
aug 27, 2025, 3:00 pm • 2 0 • view
this is so twisted
aug 27, 2025, 11:05 pm • 1 0 • view
Yes, you are right.
aug 27, 2025, 11:07 pm • 2 0 • view
Wow...you would think people would be lining up around the block to punish that person...after all people are starving. 🙄. Yeah, they should get bent for even trying to prosecute that nonsense.
aug 27, 2025, 3:35 pm • 4 0 • view
Not surprising that Pirro’s getting humiliated left and right.
aug 27, 2025, 2:18 pm • 11 0 • view
aug 27, 2025, 1:28 pm • 100 13 • view
nice👌
aug 27, 2025, 3:17 pm • 7 0 • view
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
aug 28, 2025, 8:38 pm • 1 0 • view
I guess he’s just stuck with the dry cleaning bill then. Fair trade. Fame for a cleaning bill.
aug 27, 2025, 4:46 pm • 4 0 • view
bsky.app/profile/kova...
aug 27, 2025, 3:17 pm • 5 0 • view
lol
aug 27, 2025, 4:44 pm • 3 0 • view
YAY! Fabulous.
aug 27, 2025, 1:22 pm • 4 0 • view
♪♫ I fought the law and the sub won, I fought the law and the sub won. ♫♪
aug 27, 2025, 2:08 pm • 2 0 • view
Turns out throwing a sandwich isn’t enough evidence to meat the standard. I remember watching a random dude throw his shoes at Bush Jr. This feels like the same kind of resistance. Lettuce take a mayoment to pray for the wasted bread.
aug 27, 2025, 4:45 pm • 5 1 • view
Dá-lhe povo estadunidense!👏🏻👏🏼👏🏽👏🏾👏🏿👏🇧🇷❤️
aug 27, 2025, 1:55 pm • 1 0 • view
Power to the Sub 🏆
aug 27, 2025, 2:23 pm • 2 0 • view
aug 27, 2025, 7:49 pm • 2 0 • view
Apparently, it is easier to indict a ham sandwich than to indict someone who throws a ham sandwich.
aug 27, 2025, 3:18 pm • 2 0 • view
If you do a crime do it in DC
aug 27, 2025, 6:19 pm • 1 0 • view
Subway could cash in on this if they chose to
aug 27, 2025, 4:29 pm • 5 0 • view
aug 27, 2025, 5:07 pm • 4 0 • view
A victory for food fighters!!!
aug 27, 2025, 2:31 pm • 3 0 • view
Great news.
aug 27, 2025, 2:41 pm • 0 0 • view
Grab your footlongs, guys. We're fighting fascism!
aug 27, 2025, 1:32 pm • 31 3 • view
So the charge of Felonious deli battery couldn’t pass mustard oh how I relish the thought of a judge calling out this administration for its baloney
aug 27, 2025, 2:10 pm • 17 0 • view
LOL. I bet any mayo residue left behind turned quickly in the DC summer. #sad
aug 27, 2025, 7:45 pm • 2 0 • view
Just glad the judge didn’t throw the book at him.
aug 28, 2025, 2:33 pm • 0 0 • view
Burn it. Burn a Flag.
aug 27, 2025, 2:49 pm • 2 0 • view
Do we dare assume this man can go about his life? Dont be surprised if he's stalked by police for the next year, waiting to nail him on something.
aug 27, 2025, 3:07 pm • 7 0 • view
Absolutely he will. Bet he has his lawyer on ... remember when having someone on speed dial was a thing? I'm old.
aug 28, 2025, 6:36 pm • 0 0 • view
Excellent form of resistance to a police state
aug 27, 2025, 6:34 pm • 0 0 • view
Ruled that there is a long tradition of feeding the animals
aug 27, 2025, 3:23 pm • 4 0 • view
So…Pam Blondie & Dept of Justus CAN’T indict a Ham Sandwich. Glad to know their cruel incompetence has limits.
aug 27, 2025, 3:43 pm • 7 1 • view
ham sandwiches lose their minds
aug 27, 2025, 1:39 pm • 6 0 • view
That's great news! Trump is in the Epstein files.
aug 27, 2025, 2:16 pm • 20 0 • view