avatar
Lyndon Baines Johnson @lyndonbajohnson.bsky.social

Was cajoled to watch the awful new (what 7th?) Jurassic Park movie and just thought about how in the era of bonded capital ruling the world a publisher like Knopf would probably never take a chance on a sci-fi book as "out there" as Crichton's original novel was in 1990. -OS

aug 11, 2025, 10:26 pm • 17 1

Replies

avatar
Lyndon Baines Johnson @lyndonbajohnson.bsky.social

Let alone a major movie studio spending a massive budget on adapting an original sci-fi IP that hadn't even been published yet. -OS

aug 11, 2025, 10:26 pm • 7 0 • view
avatar
Lyndon Baines Johnson @lyndonbajohnson.bsky.social

Crichton's first novel was truly bizarre. Baby's getting eaten by dinosaurs and shit, but also had a very Mary Shelley, Frankenstein's monster, kind of vibe cleverly adapted to the post cold war world. Now Knopf would just have ChatGPT rewrite Frankenstein and set in 2025. -OS

aug 11, 2025, 10:27 pm • 7 1 • view
avatar
Shawn @trambopoline96.bsky.social

Remember the mini elephants in InGen's backstory? That was some weird shit. In hindsight, of course that guy wrote something as fucking awful as Next.

aug 11, 2025, 10:55 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Philip Sewell @othershoe.bsky.social

It's interesting to me that Chrichton had several movie adaptations in the 1970s, and then a relatively fallow period in the '80s in terms of producing stories and completely in terms of adaptation. So this very big picture was a huge comeback and seeming risk, but ... Spielberg.

aug 11, 2025, 10:43 pm • 1 0 • view