avatar
Tom @alttag.bsky.social

As a prominent land owner in downtown SLC they can certainly throw their weight around when they want something (a closed road, a downtown walking easement), but they tried very hard to avoid even the appearance of meddling in state politics. Many politicians are/were members, in both parties.

jun 18, 2025, 10:21 pm • 2 0

Replies

avatar
Tom @alttag.bsky.social

So “theocracy”? No, not in any meaning of the word that approaches its actual meaning.

jun 18, 2025, 10:22 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Te-ah-tim-eh @te-ah-time-eh.bsky.social

That’s interesting, I was just reading that there’s a Mormon supermajority (86%) in Utah’s congress and LDS members make up 60% of the population there. That doesn’t affect policy at all?

jun 19, 2025, 12:08 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Tom @alttag.bsky.social

“Majority” and “theocracy” are different things.

jun 19, 2025, 12:13 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Te-ah-tim-eh @te-ah-time-eh.bsky.social

www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcn...

jun 19, 2025, 12:20 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Te-ah-tim-eh @te-ah-time-eh.bsky.social

So the supermajority doesn’t affect policy at all?

jun 19, 2025, 12:19 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Tom @alttag.bsky.social

You’re the one that said it was a theocracy. If you’ve changed your mind and believe it’s instead tyranny of the majority, great, but that’s a different argument.

jun 19, 2025, 12:23 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Tom @alttag.bsky.social

Allow me to frame it slightly differently. Accusing officials of being controlled by another entity, whether a church or the U.N. (was accused several times of the latter, b/c people believe conspiracies) is an accusation of a lack of ethics. It cuts differently than an accusation of partisanship.

jun 19, 2025, 12:31 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
🌻Tits McGee🌻 @shaunasays.bsky.social

It's definitely a theocracy when the supermajority are all pushing the same religious agenda. Are you a Mormon and that's why you are fighting so hard? And JD Vance isn't really a Catholic.

jun 19, 2025, 12:17 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Te-ah-tim-eh @te-ah-time-eh.bsky.social

I mean, if their political leadership is based entirely on their religion, how is it not theocracy?

jun 19, 2025, 12:25 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Tom @alttag.bsky.social

The definition of theocracy is control of politics by a religion. You’ve not connected “has a (super) majority” with “leadership is based on their religion” or “is controlled by religion” (also different things).

jun 19, 2025, 12:34 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Te-ah-tim-eh @te-ah-time-eh.bsky.social

A particular religious group controls politics in Utah because they believe that the law of the land should be dictated by their faith. That’s a theocracy. It’s also tyranny of the majority. Both can be true.

jun 19, 2025, 12:45 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Tom @alttag.bsky.social

“They believe the law of the land should be dictated by their faith” was generally not my experience. Abortion laws are stricter in (e.g.), IN or TX. Currently, public education & trans rights is worse in OK, WY, etc. UT’s liquor laws are odd, but so is PA, MA, etc. www.hrc.org/resources/st...

jun 19, 2025, 2:57 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Tom @alttag.bsky.social

None of this to say that is a bastion of liberal thought (ha!), or to say the church doesn’t influence the culture there, but the political environment is driven more by the Republican Party’s super majority than anything else.

jun 19, 2025, 3:03 am • 0 0 • view