Let me continue if anybody restrains his rights he is allowed to challenge that and challenge that action and the courts are supposed to remain an arbiter instead the united states stepped in and said he is not allowed to do anything to them

Do not continue or I will block you.

The courts were the arbiter and ruled a) he failed to state a claim due to 230 against Facebook and b) he had not standing to sue the government that 230 was unconstitutional. He was given his chance to appeal and he did so and lost. He was given due process and is just butt hurt he lost.

And the government has every right to pass 230 or any other law that does tort reform to give immunity. There is nothing unconstitutional about that.

But what will the 4th Circuit and the doj will do if he bring that constitutional challenge of 230 on that court ?

Asked and answered. Any such case is barred by rea judicata. I’ve repeatedly told you this.

But fyk doesn,t care about rea judicata He will bring his constitutional challenge this year he has said that clearly on a twitter space so what will happen when he will bring that suit ?

The courts care about res judicata, Pinky. What Fyk cares about is irrelevant. As I’ve told you, his case will be dismissed.

These are not difficult things to understand.

Fyk didn’t care about meeting the requirements of how he had to frame his writ of certiorari or what FRCP 5.1 really meant. The courts did which is why he lost.

How many times dows Fyk have to be proven wrong until you finally think “I shouldn’t take a single thing he says seriously? Because he has been wrong about everything and not right once.

And writ of certiorari is only require for scotus right brian ?

But he is not going to go to scotus he his going to go to the 3rd Circuit

Do you think that the doj will be forced to deal with

Deal with what?