The only evidence they bring to the table is voting patterns. Similar arguments were made by Trump supporters in 2020, Sanders supporters in the 2016 primaries, and in other earlier elections. It’s a big leap to say unusual patterns are proof of interference, and the patterns aren't that odd. 2/
Between vote margins and state laws, recounts were only legally available in Michigan and Nevada. Suspicions and vague forensic analysis wouldn’t have changed that. None are available now, so there's nowhere to go with this effort. 3/
The elections were audited in all states, comparing paper ballots to final tallies. (Most randomly select precincts to check) None of the audits found issues. In most of the swing states, it was Democratic officials overseeing the process. 4/
The voting officials were very aware that the software for some of the machines had been improperly shared, and in the case of Georgia publicly addressed the situation by increasing physical security around the master device to prevent possible manipulation. 5/
With the exception of the flaw that Georgia was taking extra security to prevent, any hack of voting equipment would necessitate hands-on access to every machine involved. That would require bypassing different security processes in hundreds of precincts, most in Democratically managed locations. 6/
A conspiracy of this magnitude would require a large number of people, and the more people necessary for a conspiracy to work, the less likely it is to be kept secret. For instance, we know about the improper sharing of voter system software because the people involved couldn’t keep it secret. 7/
I'll stop here. What frustrates me most is that this is being used to criticize Kamala, saying she's too feckless to fight. I resent those who denigrate her reputation this way. She didn't pursue it because it didn't happen, and she certainly doesn't deserve criticism for accepting the facts. 8/8
This attitude will most definitely ensure we will never have free and fair elections again. Check out the ETA website and read more reports. The data is not normal voting data. Get involved!
I checked out the website and watched the video. I read the reports. I’ve also read material from people with far more election security expertise than any of these individuals, and they all agree this is just as delusional as DJT’s claims about 2020. It’s a distraction from real voter suppression.
statescoop.com/cybersecurit...
Everyone is focusing on the security after votes have been cast. However, there was opportunity to steal votes prior to casting votes in PA. There were many shady R operatives focusing on communities that don’t typically vote e.g. Amish). I think they could have intercepted mail in ballots.
Elon Musk spent 6 weeks in PA prior to the election. Per Trump, “he really knows those voting computers.”
1) DJT doesn’t know how to turn on his own computer, so it doesn’t take much to impress him; 2) Musk doesn’t know that much about them, either; 3) Pennsylvania uses a dozen different types of voting machines and none are connected to the Internet. How would Musk or his team hack them?
The kids working for Musk sure seem to know a lot about computers.
Actually, I'd say the opposite. Their list of fraud "discoveries" includes listing the same contracts multiple times, listing programs ended as far back as the GW Bush administration, and reporting numbers off by three decimal points. These are not highly capable people.
Source?
Not true. They are asking every county for the data. If the county refuses, they will sue for it. Thus the funding needed for lawyers.