avatar
Lepidopteraptor @micahcf.bsky.social

Porque no los dos?

aug 31, 2025, 6:19 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
(VFP) Strategic Gravitas Reserve @braak.bsky.social

Because morality is definitionally relational. It's impossible to be moral in a circumstance in which there is no one that you could be immoral to.

aug 31, 2025, 6:43 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Lepidopteraptor @micahcf.bsky.social

I think these Venn diagrams overlap, and that you are both correct. Morality and meanness overlap. Having feelings has effects. You can train your feelings and reactions. But also, you're right about morality!

aug 31, 2025, 6:52 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
(VFP) Strategic Gravitas Reserve @braak.bsky.social

You can train your feelings and your reactions, which is exactly why you *shouldn't* be nice to AI. They are machines whose primary purpose is to trick you into believing they are human beings, even going insofar as to directly lie to you about their interiority.

aug 31, 2025, 7:01 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
(VFP) Strategic Gravitas Reserve @braak.bsky.social

Treating them as anything other than mindless objects built for the purpose off annoying, deceiving, and ultimately de-humanizing you is to actively participate in your own deception.

aug 31, 2025, 7:02 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Lepidopteraptor @micahcf.bsky.social

Yeah, I agree. Kind of a different point though about the morality and meanness being similar and not identical or whatever. I actually am ambivalent about AI, some are in favor, some are against.

aug 31, 2025, 7:25 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
(VFP) Strategic Gravitas Reserve @braak.bsky.social

It is a different point, but the difference between morality and meanness is *more* salient in this case, not less.

aug 31, 2025, 7:35 pm • 0 0 • view