avatar
Steven Lucy @slucy.bsky.social

These little refuge islands are generally illegal in the U.S. The minimum requirements are 10 feet wide and 50 feet long (!!!)

jul 31, 2025, 5:05 pm • 10 0

Replies

avatar
Nick @nicksattele.bsky.social

Seattle is building one 7’ wide

jul 31, 2025, 6:19 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Steven Lucy @slucy.bsky.social

Read the thread for the corrected dimensions

jul 31, 2025, 6:20 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Steven Lucy @slucy.bsky.social

And look how long it is! 36'!

jul 31, 2025, 7:25 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Nick @nicksattele.bsky.social

The way this is setup, if it wasn’t that long, someone would park next to it and block visibility

jul 31, 2025, 9:26 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Steven Lucy @slucy.bsky.social

The bumpout should be really long (longer than they typically are around here), but the island doesn't really need to be.

jul 31, 2025, 9:29 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Matt Finch @themattfinch.bsky.social

Also, are those actual bollards instead of flex posts??

jul 31, 2025, 5:31 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Stephen Jacob Smith @stephenjacobsmith.com

What law/code/standard?

jul 31, 2025, 5:08 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Steven Lucy @slucy.bsky.social

Ok I misremembered, the NACTO standard is 6x40, with a peferred width of 8-10. NHWA is min. 4', rec. 8' and doesn't seem to have a minimum length, it just says "sufficient" for the pedestrian volume. Chicago's internal standard is the NACTO standard (6x40). nacto.org/publication/...

jul 31, 2025, 5:16 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Steven Lucy @slucy.bsky.social

Hey @nacto.bsky.social maybe consider loosening your pedestrian island standards for low-speed two-lane streets?

jul 31, 2025, 5:17 pm • 7 0 • view
avatar
Ben S @bensh3.bsky.social

This sounds like local standards. NYCDOT min width is 7 ft, FHWA recommends 4ft min for ADA

jul 31, 2025, 5:12 pm • 8 0 • view
avatar
Steven Lucy @slucy.bsky.social

Yeah I definitely both misremembered and universalized the NACTO dimensions :)

jul 31, 2025, 5:18 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Steven Lucy @slucy.bsky.social

BUT....I have never seen a small island like this in the States so

jul 31, 2025, 5:18 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
olong @olong.bsky.social

The NACTO minimum is 6', justified as "the length of a bicycle or a person pushing a stroller". PROWAG also has 6' min, don't know about prior ADA guidance. Per our local (LA) guidance smaller crossing islands are fine but shouldn't be treated as refuges

jul 31, 2025, 5:23 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Steven Lucy @slucy.bsky.social

Do you have a streetview (or photo) example of a smaller island in LA?

jul 31, 2025, 5:25 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
olong @olong.bsky.social

Off the top of my head there's one or two narrow ones along Figueroa in Wilmington. LADOT has a vision zero dashboard where you can filter by project type. In general though I think the interpretation is that 6' is the practical minimum for new islands

jul 31, 2025, 5:49 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Stephen Jacob Smith @stephenjacobsmith.com

4’ would be about the length of a person in a wheelchair with somebody behind them standing (caretaker), which seems reasonable. This one seems to be roughly that.

jul 31, 2025, 5:14 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Steven Lucy @slucy.bsky.social

I mean, if it's a zebra crossing you shouldn't have to stop in the island!

jul 31, 2025, 5:22 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Stephen Jacob Smith @stephenjacobsmith.com

I wonder where NYCDOT min width comes from though, 7’ seems excessive (maybe two of those, one coming from each direction?)

jul 31, 2025, 5:15 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Steven Lucy @slucy.bsky.social

I appreciate 7' when I'm on my bike but I doubt that's the motivation.

jul 31, 2025, 5:17 pm • 1 0 • view