There is no lawsuit in PA bsky.app/profile/r5-t...

I saw snopes piece but there was 2nd whistleblower story that wasn't covered. You have to admit, DOGE operatives using stealth backdoor to delete/alter data is a thing. There was a purpose for bomb scares that is suspicious because they were only in swing states. Felon & helno admitted tampering.

I don't have to admit anything

bsky.app/profile/r5-t...

Is there really a second (or even first) "whistleblower" bsky.app/profile/pink...

In the legal sense, no, there is not. They are using the popular sense of the word. Zarnowski, if he really ever worked for the CIA, would have had to comply with the Whistleblower Protection Act if he wanted legal protection for revealing classified info.

I get your point. It was written that nothing he revealed was classified only hidden.

Which I believe to be bullshit, just like I think his claim of having worked for the CIA is bullshit and his claim about there having been an audit pertaining to the voting machines is bullshit. If it isn't classified, he can release it.

Yes, I think that's true. Why isn't the 2nd whistleblower being scrutinized?

It isn't clear from that second post that there is a second whistleblower. The headline says there is but when you read it they say nothing about a second whistleblower. It is just more info and then they start talking about "team members." I guess we are supposed to assume that the info they

talk about came from this second whistleblower. Who the hell knows? I think I know who at least one person behind this substack is and there is no reason whatsoever to think that she would have access to the kind of info she claims to have.

😂 you be you. I'll pay attention to what people in the effected departments are telling us.

Please do not conflate my fact checking disinformation with an endorsement of Trump, Musk, or DOGE I fucking hate then and despise grifters taking advantage of people's false hopes