But if there is an infringement of someone else's safety, rights, or wellbeing, then you'd accept that there should be a limit to the personal freedom in question? Society doesn't function if everyone just pleases themselves at everyone else's expense, right?

Trans women have not shown themselves to be a danger to women the way men are. Men ascribe their own motives to trans women.

Again, not relevant to what I asked you.

Persecuting someone based on their personal choices or changes they make in their lives is an infringement on their rights. Medical journals and peer reviews have come out stating the brain chemistry of a trans man more closely aligns with that of those born as men and the same for women.

That's a mixture of issues, none of which answers my question. I'm happy to discuss them individually, but only if you can at least agree that there are rational societal limits to personal freedoms. I'm hardly asking for the moon, just a basic ethical benchmark.

If someone's right to safety or life is violated by someone else, then I'd agree that is a basis for dispute.