Is it more important that Arteta is given time to prove he can win or that Arsenal win?
Is it more important that Arteta is given time to prove he can win or that Arsenal win?
I think he’s already more than demonstrated he can compete for the title. Also I think there’s a much bigger chance that if he was sacked things would be much worse at Arsenal without him. And why would they go that route just as the young squad he’s assembled are coming into their prime?
Most LFC fans thought the same when Klopp was leaving, but the change has actually regenerated things more quickly than Klopp likely would have been able to do.
From the outside looking in, it felt like Klopp was burnt out competing with City’s unlimited money machine rather than a proactive decision by the senior management to remove him. Maybe after a similar amount of time Arteta will go but the next two seasons are key from an Arsenal pov.
That’s my take on it. They won’t sack him. But his contract has 2 years left to run. So I think there have to very clear improvements in these next 2 years or they can’t in good conscience renew him without at least exploring the market of managers out there.
Again, I find it funny you think he won’t be able to deliver trophies to us and yet are trying to make very strong arguments to sack him and “improve” with someone else. Why would a Liverpool fan want Arsenal to hire a new manager if doing so would win us trophies at their expense?