avatar
Darkest Timeline @darkest-timeline.bsky.social

Cool. A reddit post.

aug 23, 2025, 10:31 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
Darkest Timeline @darkest-timeline.bsky.social

You'll notice I specifically said if you live to 65, which kept my statement accurate. I intentionally excluded accidents and workplace deaths because my point was and still is that the system was intentionally created so that people could retire at 65 and enjoy a few years of not working.

aug 23, 2025, 10:36 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
RedBlackHistoryman @redblackhistoryman.bsky.social

A few years. Not 20. Less than 5 typically. If you live to 95 mooching for 30 years is a huge problem, not intended function.

aug 23, 2025, 10:38 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Darkest Timeline @darkest-timeline.bsky.social

"Mooching" 🙄🫠 Yes, a 65 year old (who now has to wait until 67) will statistically get three more years to enjoy retirement than they did in 1930.

aug 23, 2025, 10:45 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
RedBlackHistoryman @redblackhistoryman.bsky.social

Made up stats for made up scenarios lol

aug 23, 2025, 10:58 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Darkest Timeline @darkest-timeline.bsky.social

Ok, what am I making up? 1930 numbers: Average lifespan after 65=78. 78-65=13. Average of 13 years of retirement. The 2022 actuarial table for average life expectancy after age 67=16.11. Average of 16.11 years of retirement.

aug 23, 2025, 11:12 pm • 0 0 • view