I'm not saying Garland should have broken the law. I'm saying Garland should have treated this case like he treated every case for anyone not named Donald Trump He didn't. He gave Trump pass after pass and please and pretty please and yes sir until he ran out of time because he was a fucking coward
Trump had much much much better attorneys than that other guy. And he received a lot of deferential treatment from the courts.
Deferential treatment from the courts. AND FROM GARLAND. That is literally, 100% my point.
Garland had to be very careful. He was not deferential.
The cops at Uvalde "had to be very careful." Doesn't mean they didn't fail.
You really believe some random guy is going to get the same treatment as a rich former President leading a fucking cult that is also one of the 2 major political parties in this country? Are you serious?
You keep very succinctly and correctly describing how Garland failed but still don't think it's a failure somehow.
Legally? Yes. That is what the law requires.