Target cities should hold military takeover referendums. Get the population on record on whether this is what they want. talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/think...
Target cities should hold military takeover referendums. Get the population on record on whether this is what they want. talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/think...
I think we'd all be shocked & amazed at the percentage who vote in favor.
Unlikely
You're right. I guess I was thinking the suburbs would have a vote.
I don't think many would, but if a majority did somehow vote for it, then what's the problem? If people in a particular place actually want to live under military occupation, then they can vote for that - fine. The problem is doing it against the will of the people having to live under occupation.
Target cities should attack and invade any smaller MAGA-dominated suburbs.
What do you get when the National Guard of one state invades the sovereignty of another state without the request and approval of that states governor? Oh right, a Civil War.
How about fire trucks are deployed wherever ICE shows up? Truckers with CBs can”break down” at points of egress to block the Gestapo from leaving. Then people start showing up.
Off topic, but if Abrego Garcia is deported to Uganda, can France immigrate him and them make him a diplomat to the United States?
Uganda has no allegiance to France, so no!
Now this is the kind of thinking we need from the Dems in Congress.
Must say, it is the best idea I have heard in ages.
US would just name him persona non grata, but France should do that with the US ambassador there.
Consider signing. Pam Bondi & Ashley Moody corruption. Bondi & Moody's corrupt FL legacy qualified them for national office. www.change.org/p/pam-bondi-...
Omg! That would be priceless! Maybe Venezuela could make Andry Hernandez Ambassador to US.
And you think. Trump is playing to the red and rural voters. Media-go to Memphis - Birmingham etc. and ask how safe their streets are and talk to Chicago’s Lakeview, North Center. You let Trump define the the battle. Get visual. Oops-sorry US media is a shell of itself. Work for a living.
I like!
Goveners should deploy their guard troups doing something far from cities and a ounce that they are unavailable.
Yes. Blue states and blue dots need to be PROACTIVE against fascism not REACTIVE.
They should be prepared to resist the invasion with force.
we also need to take a page from Planned Parenthood, and have volunteer escorts. People that stand outside Home Depot’s with day laborers, or who escort people to their immigration appointments. Not just one or two people, but dozens, arms locked.
This is a much better alternative than an outright insurrection that is expected to occur.
🎯
When the National Gaurd kills US Citizens, how do we go back from there? Don't say Kent State....that was 1960s. The military is losing this war against the citizens, and I fear MAGA has no clue they are going to be masaqured. They are 30%.
Governors of democratic states with WH targeted cities should call up their National Guard to their targeted cities to control and block the Federal Government -with help from complicit Republican governors - sending their National Guard troops to occupy democratic cities.
Came here to say this very thing.
Go ahead and post what you were going to say it bears repeating by more than one person more than 1000 until it happens.
The governors should command them to stand down before trump gets to them.
It’s not what I want.
Why not just start having homegrown armed militias be everywhere the us military is? If these military members don’t get shook looking across the street at grandma and grandpa with a musket ready to put their lives on the line against a superior force nothing will and we are all doomed anyway.
Or maybe even have local and state police arrest and prosecute the invading army. Nice is over. Fight back by any means they make necessary.
Love this idea. DC should do this too.
That'll put a stop to it real quick
Tbh, blue states should start forming formal state militias that are totally independent of presidential control.
Well Constitutionally the National Guard is the Militias the Second amendment states are necessary to ensure the freedom of the states.
Not quite. By statute, the National Guard is under dual state and federal control and can be federalized. State Defense Forces are the true state-only militia: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_d...
youtu.be/Pswvi3QN_tI?...
Hopium's Resolutions Project from Simon Rosenberg sounds similar: www.hopiumchronicles.com/p/hopiums-re...
Rather than looking outside the box, perhaps look at US history. 1963 – 500,000 protest Vietnam war in DC 1995 – 800,000 in DC for Million Man March for Racial justice 2017 – 500,000 in DC for Women’s rights and anti DJT policy 2025 and the dismantling of US rights and freedoms - ??? in DC.
This works while a country is operating on true democratic principles, however any unfavorable outcome, which is likely, would be discounted as fake. Referendum logistics would be limiting. Sorry, at this point Americans need to muster the will to protest like never before, this is what is left.
It is time we start calling out the spineless republicans in Congress who are enabling trumps fascist takeover! They seem to have forgotten they don’t work for Trump….. they work for US!! Time to say “You’re fired’ #ComplacencyIsComplicity
If you want to get really bold, blue state governors should start arresting ICE for human rights violations.
The problem here is that in practice, you would be asking maga cops to arrest maga ice for doing what the maga cops wished they could do themselves.
Launch MELT: The Maximizing Existing Liberties Taskforce. And hire them specifically to arrest ICE. :)
It's on a par with asking for ice cream in hell, but I sure hope some governor reads - and acts on - what you're saying.
Organize large groups to peacefully surround NG and ICE wherever they appear and wherever they are billeted and prevent their movement.
That's more like it! Criticism can have meaning when it comes with a suggestion. Well done.
some concrete things that can be done by pressuring local businesses: - deny them lodging - deny them food - deny them fuel - deny them any peace - publicly mock them...laugh at them make it hell for them...individually and organizationally
$47 billion over four years at over a million dollars a day won't last long. I forgot to include Noam's photo ops. 🙄 What a waste of trump thinks it's his personal bank account tax dollars.
A good idea. Usually, a referendum has to have X number of signatures to be put on a ballot. Then, a special election needs to be held to be voted on. We don't have the time to accomplish this. Dear leader is talking about a couple of weeks. He's activating national guard units across the country.
Depends on where you are located. In San Francisco a measure can get on the ballot as a referendum with signatures or by a vote of the Board of Supervisors which can happen much faster. We've already got a Trump themed special election coming up...
I did not know that. Go San Fran! Of course, the election must be planned with all of the personnel involved. It's a matter of logistics.
I like it, but elections are expensive, and big city budgets are already stressed, especially with Trump pulling hundreds of millions of bux from local law enforcement.
In the referendum, they should mention food, housing & mental health support. Is bringing in the Guard the most cost effective way to reduce crime? If you could reduce crime by y% would you rather have x boots on the ground or offer $100 in grocery debit cards to x00 people in need. Etc....
Superb idea.
What? No, that's our Governor's job. We elected him to do that. You don't need a plebiscite to ask whether you want federal troops in your city. You had that already. It was called the Governor's Race in Your State. One of their jobs is to be the Commander in Chief of their National Guard.
bsky.app/profile/wat3...
Blue governors should mobilize the guard to protect citizens from Trump's invasion
What if the Governor called up the Guard ahead of Trump and sent them somewhere?
This can serve multiple, helpful purposes. It's more robust and effective than polls, and percentages against clearly signal popular will and opinion. A major chunk of the regime's strategy still depends on warping public sentiment.
Pope Leo on the streets of Chicago wearing a White Sox hat and holding the hands of immigrant children.
Target cities should start raising Minuteman companies and channeling the Patriots of old.
Our mayor is weak and cop-alicious. :(
The feds don't even have the code to access the bathroom much less the buildings and comm systems. You can't takeover and keep running a City/State without cooperation of the locals. I don't think Chgo Police will even let them park near Federal Center.
@demgovs.org @democraticags.bsky.social
What Pritzker is doing in Chicago seems almost as effective - assembling a broad coalition of community, business, faith, and political leaders. It has put Trump on the defensive to justify the invasion while setting that debate on more favorable terrain. Elections ain't cheap.
📌
💯 A great idea. Would make a clear record of whether those living in the city felt crime was so high they needed troops. Could be very useful in subsequent legal efforts to force removal.
Or Dems preemptively organize in their State a March Against Trump Invasion
Add what they would rather the money and effort be spent on, too.
These are great ideas, I hope people are listening!!
Beats torches and pitchforks, but I wouldn't rule them out.
Mayors should declare a general strike ...
💯. Governors should do so as well. Shut down O’Hare and JFK. Stop the ports in LA and Baltimore. Have the software workers in Seattle who keep Amazon and Microsoft running take a few days off. Let’s bring the USA to a standstill.
Great idea in principle but functionally impossible in the face of an "invasion" that could happen tomorrow. Elections are complicated and take time to set up, months. We elect our representatives to speak and act on our behalf - let them all speak out early and often.
It doesn’t actually take very long. Ca is doing one for their redistricing on a few months notice.
governors could just activate their guard now
Sure, CA referendum via special session added to the ballot in November, 3 months, no faster anywhere else. Trump will move into multiple cities before then. What will be voted on, a resolution without legal force? Or . . . ?
Correct! And the suggested referendum can easily be added onto the ballot. Californian here. Let’s do it.
Non-targeted red regions should hold them too. Let them ask for takeover and have Trump The explain why they’re not getting one.
Yep. All the focus on safer Blue state cities means red state cities where crime is higher are being neglected. The people of Oklahoma, Louisiana, Tennessee, Florida, etc are being out at higher risk of crime without fear of punishment.
Target cities should pass poison pill ordinances that say that if local police are "federalized"—or in any way break the local civilian chain of command—the city stops paying way. No way local taxpayers should be made to pay for their own military occupation.
I’m reminded of the saying “be careful what you wish for”. You may find out that 51% either don’t care or actively support the buffoon. Do some in depth research before assuming most people think like you do.
You mean like the Reuters poll earlier today that showed only 38% of those participating approve of deploying the military to DC?
I was referring to the next set of states to be invaded. If I’m wrong, I’ll apologise.
using what? their local election system? City? County? for when? November? April? c'mon Man??
Do it now before armed government men are deployed to polling places.
Hell no! Whenever the Nazis held referendums, they got their legitimization. Do not fall into that pseudo-democratic honey pot. Defend your Constitution, demand your govt. upholds it. Do not give fascists a foot in the door.
In a nutshell, from the link: "The Trump system is impunity for friends and infinite scrutiny for adversaries." Adding that the infinite scrutiny against Trump's personal opponents is paid for by taxpayers.
Sorry, was actually from another link at TPM: talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/a-mag...
Josh is the only marshall i acknowledge. he probably makes his own hefty gavels, too.
Because that will deter Trump?
They should have defense of the city drills.
A Survey Monkey survey to go out via their already existing email lists. Survey qr codes on traveling/static billboards, newspapers, which can be spun up quickly - and doorhangers or postcards, which take time and manpower
on what legal basis can trump send troops, national guard or otherwise to chicago? He'd have to declare some kind of emergency and then chicago sues and a district court forbids it. he cant send troops to any city besides dc. la proved that.
begin in town halls and expand to state...show the colors
Everything depends on the wording of the question. "Would you be willing to have our state National Guard assist police officers, if the result was a substantial drop in violent crime throughout the city?" gets a lot of well-intentioned "yes" votes. Many people would take that trade-off easily.