But we have the aforementioned manifesto policies, a definition of transphobia endorsed by the party power structures, a disciplinary process (it’s not great, but we have one), and a leadership candidate with the most endorsements who pledged his support of trans rights in his campaign.

I want Polanski to win and change the Greens to be trans inclusive. I want Corbyn and Sultana to vocally support trans rights, which they've been suspiciously silent on lately. My support for either party is contingent, but I see little reason to favour only one at this point. Both have baggage.

I think it’s very unfair say we’re not trans inclusive. I think we’ve got the strongest policies, and we’ve got a definition of transphobia that sets us apart from every other party. But I do hope Zack wins. It would be transformative, even so.

I think when half your outgoing leadership are openly transphobic it's not very trans inclusive. If they lose and the party shifts away from that, great.

We’re not VERY trans inclusive, but we are trans inclusive

Ramsay didn't out himself as a transphobe until fairly recently, and Denyer has always been an ally - nobody really voted for Ramsay last time around, he rode Carla's coat-tails. We're about to find out if he and Chowns have burned their support as a result. 🤞

On why GPEW and not YP, I'll only say this: YP was just started, and chose to admit transphobic MPs. GPEW is a party trying to deal with an infestation, which is different because our tervert scum got in years ago. YP founders and current leaders *chose* to have tervert scum in the party.