Your @NYMag reference merely repeats a claim in @WSJ in an April 30th 2023 article. The @WSJ claims to have 'documents' and 'calendars' in their possession, but has NOT disclosed a single one of them. NO ONE can read, inspect, authenticate their stuff. The 2 journalists never respond to requests.
You ARE aware, aren't you, that everyone and his sister is using Epstein's name to SMEAR people they don't like. This has been going on for years, without physical evidence showing up. Smears made by people who count on people's blind belief, and on the smears dragging on for god knows how long.
Allen's spokeswoman confirmed the WSJ reporting: "Woody and Soon-Yi lived in the same neighborhood as Epstein and were frequently invited to dinner parties at his townhouse. There were always other guests at those gatherings." How did Epstein get his hooks into Woody Allen? Christina Engelhardt.
No 'Allen spokesman' has come forward 'confirming' that. That's why that alleged 'spokesman' was left anonymous. Christina Engelhardt has come forward saying she was NOT 16 (= underage) after all. The @THR editor who published her interview, claims 'Babi' said 16. These LIARS are all so credible!
Allen’s spokeswoman is Leslee Dart. www.bustle.com/entertainmen.... His relationship with Engelhardt wasn’t criminal, but it was creepy, and Epstein knew about it. www.thedailybeast.com/inside-woody.... The NYT published Allen’s 2016 letter about dinners with Epstein. www.nytimes.com/2025/08/05/u...
For some reason, the @NYTimes 'forgot' to publish Woody's second letter. We know it is authentic as, just like the first letter, it is written on a typewriter, it has Woody's signature, and it contains only one paragraph.
In other words, if you believe that 'NYT letter to Epstein' is authentic, I have all of Amsterdam's bridges to sell to you.
And, just like with the @WJS article, the 'journalists' will not reveal their sources and disclose their 'documents' for inspection and authentication. Are you gullible?
Woody Allen and his spokeswoman had opportunities to deny the story or the letter’s authenticity, but declined to do so. It is not clear whether the 17-year-old Tracy in Allen’s Manhattan is based on Christina Englehardt, but, coincidentally, she goes to Dalton School, where Epstein used to teach.
Woody Allen is not so stupid as to waste his time by giving this idiotic 'letter' free publicity. Any 'authenticity' is to be established by the NY Times or objective expertise; instead the NY Times *refuses* to disclose the source/document. It's VERY clear that 17 yo 'Tracy' is based on 'Stacey'.
Woody Allen’s obsession with young girls is a bit more persistent than he likes to admit, as is evident in the "Woody Papers" at Princeton. "Allen's work is flatly boorish. Running through all of the boxes is an insistent, vivid obsession with young women and girls." Epstein was well aware of that.
Leslee Dart has never made such statement, was not named as the 'spokesperson' in the WSJ article. No one else has come forward to claim having made the statement. The 'relationship with Engelhardt' was confirmed by no one, not even by Mia Farrow, who figured in it, and is never too lazy to smear.