From wikipedia. Holocaust deniers and pro-Nazi polemicists—most notably British writer David Irving—use the bombing in an attempt to establish a moral equivalence between the war crimes committed by the Nazi government and the killing of German civilians by Allied
There is no moral equivalence as the Holocaust was systematic evil genovide without peer, but the UK does not deserve a free pass for war crime of Dresden and US does not deserve a free pass for war crimes of Hiroshima/Nagasaki.
I don't get the fixation with Dresden. There were far more abhorent targets of allied bombing efforts in nazi germany than Dresden. Dresden had at least startegic value as a logistics hub. There were plenty of german cities without strategic value, that were bombed.
But none to the extent of Dresden, costing 25k lives, with questionable military purpose, and occurring at end of war, when it was huge overkill and a display of allied military might?
"systematic evil genocide without peer" Israel: "hold my beer"