..."forced in a candidate few people wanted"
..."forced in a candidate few people wanted"
Ah my bad. Thigh tbf, I'd say the point stands. They forced her in by undermining the one candidate that would win against her. She wasn't forced in as in "there was no primary" Are you people always this illiterate or just when it suits?
It is adorable that you call someone else illiterate after they show you exactly what you typed.
Inartfully argued truths are still true.
Except none of you have established the truth of your opinions.
The DNC argued in court that they had the legal right to undermine the popular vote.
Yep they argued it but they never said they did it...also there is zero fucking evidence they did. Sanders had his teeth kicked in. Cope harder about it.
Yes, the DNC and Hillary Clinton kicked his teeth in.
Sanders re:voters...they just weren't that into him, much like you and anyone you've ever been romantically interested in.
Keep going. You're really helping her image.
That you think I care about her image or anything I write somehow has an effect on her image shows just how divorced from reality you are.
“In evaluating Plaintiffs’ claims at this stage, the Court assumes their allegations are true—that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Clinton and sought to propel her ahead of her Democratic opponent,” the court order dismissing the lawsuit stated.
..."assumes"...you suck at this.
Again, the truth remains the truth. You're resorting to petty personal attacks. Good for you? It doesn't make you more convincing. It doesn't make the DNC's actions ethical. It doesn't alleviate Clinton of her complicity in undermining the people.
Exactly, you just don't have a grasp of reality let alone any truth you claim to know. Then you cried about apt descriptions.
Except they didn't. The people rejected Sanders. It was over after Super Tuesday.