avatar
taliesinwho.bsky.social @taliesinwho.bsky.social

..."forced in a candidate few people wanted"

apr 1, 2025, 7:32 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
Ro ro Rose @rosememes.bsky.social

Ah my bad. Thigh tbf, I'd say the point stands. They forced her in by undermining the one candidate that would win against her. She wasn't forced in as in "there was no primary" Are you people always this illiterate or just when it suits?

apr 1, 2025, 7:35 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
taliesinwho.bsky.social @taliesinwho.bsky.social

It is adorable that you call someone else illiterate after they show you exactly what you typed.

apr 1, 2025, 7:43 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Unreality3D @unreality3d.bsky.social

Inartfully argued truths are still true.

apr 1, 2025, 7:58 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
taliesinwho.bsky.social @taliesinwho.bsky.social

Except none of you have established the truth of your opinions.

apr 1, 2025, 8:04 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Unreality3D @unreality3d.bsky.social

The DNC argued in court that they had the legal right to undermine the popular vote.

apr 1, 2025, 8:15 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
taliesinwho.bsky.social @taliesinwho.bsky.social

Yep they argued it but they never said they did it...also there is zero fucking evidence they did. Sanders had his teeth kicked in. Cope harder about it.

apr 1, 2025, 9:23 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Unreality3D @unreality3d.bsky.social

Yes, the DNC and Hillary Clinton kicked his teeth in.

apr 1, 2025, 9:55 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
taliesinwho.bsky.social @taliesinwho.bsky.social

Sanders re:voters...they just weren't that into him, much like you and anyone you've ever been romantically interested in.

apr 1, 2025, 10:08 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Unreality3D @unreality3d.bsky.social

Keep going. You're really helping her image.

apr 1, 2025, 10:43 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
taliesinwho.bsky.social @taliesinwho.bsky.social

That you think I care about her image or anything I write somehow has an effect on her image shows just how divorced from reality you are.

apr 1, 2025, 10:45 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Unreality3D @unreality3d.bsky.social

“In evaluating Plaintiffs’ claims at this stage, the Court assumes their allegations are true—that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Clinton and sought to propel her ahead of her Democratic opponent,” the court order dismissing the lawsuit stated.

apr 1, 2025, 9:55 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
taliesinwho.bsky.social @taliesinwho.bsky.social

..."assumes"...you suck at this.

apr 1, 2025, 10:04 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Unreality3D @unreality3d.bsky.social

Again, the truth remains the truth. You're resorting to petty personal attacks. Good for you? It doesn't make you more convincing. It doesn't make the DNC's actions ethical. It doesn't alleviate Clinton of her complicity in undermining the people.

apr 1, 2025, 10:08 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
taliesinwho.bsky.social @taliesinwho.bsky.social

Exactly, you just don't have a grasp of reality let alone any truth you claim to know. Then you cried about apt descriptions.

apr 1, 2025, 10:10 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
taliesinwho.bsky.social @taliesinwho.bsky.social

Except they didn't. The people rejected Sanders. It was over after Super Tuesday.

apr 1, 2025, 7:42 pm • 0 0 • view