Xinis asks Ensign if he can assure that Abrego won't be moved tonight. I'm happy to speak to my client, but I don't I don't have authorization to do so at this moment, he says.
Replies
We’ve seen this movie before.
aug 25, 2025, 6:21 pm • 35 2 • view
Does Ensign sound like a lawyer who hates his client?
aug 25, 2025, 7:06 pm • 0 0 • view
JFC! 🙄🙄🙄
aug 25, 2025, 8:57 pm • 0 0 • view
Moving a prisoner around as tactic. Gov counsel can't give word won't be moved. Jfc
aug 25, 2025, 6:23 pm • 27 2 • view
It's relatively normal for attorneys to say they lack authority unless they explicitly got authority to make a representation. There's nothing abnormal about that in particular. Obviously, there's a lot abnormal about the Government's bad faith in this case.
aug 25, 2025, 9:15 pm • 6 0 • view
I get that. And, full disclosure I'm not American so no expertise here! but shouldn't DOJ have come prepared to address the issue and isn't the fact they didn't part of deteriorating view of gov counsel by the bench?
aug 26, 2025, 12:25 am • 1 0 • view
In an ideal world they would have been prepared to make that representation. And also ideally they could make it knowing that their client would listen to them. But the issue here is the client, not necessarily the attorney (although imo Ensign has behaved in bad faith himself at times in this case)
aug 26, 2025, 12:55 am • 1 0 • view
Who is his “client”? Doesn’t he represent the people? Help me out…🤷🏼♀️
aug 25, 2025, 6:30 pm • 3 0 • view
Client is DOJ
aug 25, 2025, 6:32 pm • 8 0 • view
The federal government in this case, he is the DOJ. He’s referring to #ICE or #DHS The good folks playing army rn 🤬🙄🤮
aug 25, 2025, 6:34 pm • 7 1 • view
But is this proper, though? Is a federal agency the 'client' of a federal attorney/employee? Seems like they ought to be declaring that "the Government" or "the Administration" is the movant, not a 'client'.
aug 25, 2025, 7:24 pm • 1 1 • view
The DOJ represents entities of the US government in a lawyer/client relationship. It doesn't matter that they aren't "hired" or paid for representation services. Within the government, lawyers provide advice to clients who have authority to take action under laws.
aug 25, 2025, 7:48 pm • 2 0 • view
No, DHS.
aug 25, 2025, 7:44 pm • 4 0 • view
Noem
aug 25, 2025, 10:57 pm • 3 0 • view
*Gnome
aug 26, 2025, 4:02 am • 1 0 • view
I fear they will move him. Judge will admonish them, but otherwise able to do nothing. Then it dies a death by a thousand cuts over the next 4 years. I can’t say what I think should happen to Trump and those involved (I’m already banned on Reddit and others). 🤦🏼♂️😐
aug 25, 2025, 6:35 pm • 19 2 • view
Xinis to Ensign: At least until we have a schedule set, I will order that he not be moved from where he is now, principally to have access to both criminal and habeas counsel. You let you know in the morning where your clients stand on that and I'll take it from there.
aug 25, 2025, 6:21 pm • 567 65 • view
So polite to the fascists
aug 25, 2025, 6:24 pm • 3 0 • view
The bove doctrine governs this order, no?
aug 25, 2025, 6:23 pm • 2 0 • view
In the morning? He will be moved tonight. Guaranteed.
aug 25, 2025, 6:24 pm • 7 0 • view
The judge ordered that he not be moved. And got the DoJ attorney to say that was sufficient. So if they do move him, it will be a clear violation of the order.
aug 25, 2025, 6:52 pm • 1 0 • view
They don't care about violations.
aug 25, 2025, 7:20 pm • 0 0 • view
No, but even this administration recognizes that their attorneys can't be hung out to dry. Xinis correctly put Ensign on notice that personal sanctions would accrue ("as an officer of the court") if the order is violated. Tough to get lawyers to work for you if you wave that off.
aug 25, 2025, 7:27 pm • 3 0 • view
Sorry, but I doubt if these psychopaths care. People are expendable. The plane is in the air and all that.
aug 25, 2025, 7:30 pm • 0 0 • view
If they violate it, that will be a line they haven't crossed yet. There's value in pulling their masks off, so everyone can see what we're dealing with.
aug 25, 2025, 7:33 pm • 0 0 • view
Haven't crossed yet? Are you kidding?
aug 25, 2025, 9:20 pm • 1 0 • view
Can you point me to an instance where they have directly disobeyed a court order, after acknowledging that the order was valid?
aug 25, 2025, 9:22 pm • 0 0 • view
There are some folks in an El Salvador prison and a few pilots who would like to have a word with you.
aug 25, 2025, 9:26 pm • 0 0 • view
When did they acknowledge that the order was valid?
aug 25, 2025, 9:27 pm • 0 0 • view
Xinis asks Ensign if her oral pronouncement on that is sufficient or if she needs to issue a written order. Ensign says oral order is sufficient and he will relay that to his client.
aug 25, 2025, 6:22 pm • 555 51 • view
bsky.app/profile/gran...
aug 25, 2025, 6:26 pm • 0 0 • view
Judge got their number.
aug 25, 2025, 8:11 pm • 0 0 • view
Jesus
aug 25, 2025, 6:23 pm • 2 0 • view
He will 100% relay that, and they will 100% ignore it and move him anyway. “BuT yOu DiDn’T gIvE a WrItTeN oRdEr”
aug 25, 2025, 6:23 pm • 27 0 • view
Her question is intended to place Ensign at risk of contempt and losing his license to practice. They almost certainly will not move him. Fingers, of course, crossed with these MoFos.
aug 25, 2025, 6:40 pm • 5 1 • view
I see no reason why they wouldn't move him anyway. It's like a dare to the govt, and when does Trump ignore a chance to give the court the finger? "You can't tell ME what to do"
aug 25, 2025, 9:28 pm • 3 0 • view
Aubrey, I totally get why you’d think that. And maybe you’ll be proved right. But the setup is dire: Xinis has laid a clear and unambiguous ruling; Ensign has acknowledged it and its force. He is screwed if Kilmer is moved.
aug 25, 2025, 10:17 pm • 1 0 • view
I hope you're right.
aug 25, 2025, 10:24 pm • 0 0 • view
Never give these people the option. Just make it written. They will screw you with your own leniency.
aug 25, 2025, 6:43 pm • 7 0 • view
Why might she ask that question, I wonder? 🤔
aug 25, 2025, 7:19 pm • 0 0 • view
Why would she possibly take his word for it? They’ve already demonstrated they’ll play games with oral v written orders
aug 25, 2025, 6:26 pm • 3 0 • view
I can only assume she asked that with a healthy dose of sarcasm.
aug 25, 2025, 7:35 pm • 0 0 • view
Write it down, issue the minute order and written verdict asap. This Government has shown a complete lack of regard for the rule of law and any spoken word orders.
aug 25, 2025, 6:35 pm • 0 0 • view
This is like watching a horror film and having the urge to shout at the idiots on screen to not go into the creepy murder basement alone.
aug 25, 2025, 6:23 pm • 19 1 • view
Put it in writing. That's been an issue before.
aug 25, 2025, 6:24 pm • 5 0 • view
Ensign asks the judge if Abrego's counsel can clarify whether he has attempted to re-open immigration proceedings bc it will impact the arguments the government makes in its filings.
aug 25, 2025, 6:24 pm • 373 28 • view
It's amazing to me how much the presumption of regularity for the government has been shrunk.
aug 25, 2025, 6:28 pm • 11 0 • view
Sandoval-Moshenberg says that no motion to re-open has been filed at this time but he has served a reasonable fear notice on the government (requesting a credible fear interview prior to deportation to Uganda).
aug 25, 2025, 6:27 pm • 411 27 • view
Oral order is sufficient (to get a bove bird) your honor
aug 25, 2025, 6:30 pm • 1 0 • view
Sandoval-Mohenberg: If the government is sort of essentially stipulating that a motion to reopen is the proper procedural mechanism here...I can speak with Mr. Ensign about that this afternoon.
aug 25, 2025, 6:28 pm • 352 21 • view
Sandoval-Moshenberg: Part of the issue here is that we're still not 100% clear as to what even the government's position as to what the process is. So to the extent that we can clarify that tonight, that'll be very, very helpful.
aug 25, 2025, 6:28 pm • 400 36 • view
The Gov't's position is apparently to lie their ass off in court as much as possible, and keep kidnapping him and moving him around in a game a whack-a-mole as they try to get him to a torture/concentration camp in complete violation of all Civil Rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
aug 25, 2025, 6:47 pm • 4 0 • view
You first
aug 25, 2025, 6:29 pm • 0 0 • view
Judge Xinis: Ok, I'll look forward to your filing on the proposed schedule tomorrow. Shall we say 10 am? The parties agree. Ok...Anything else? Ensign says for the record that DOJ objects to the court's findings but will address basis in forthcoming filing.
aug 25, 2025, 6:30 pm • 391 29 • view
DOJ objects!🤣🤣🤣 Because our lies are the truth
aug 25, 2025, 8:36 pm • 1 0 • view
Didn’t want to lead with “we object”? You just want to tack it on at the end as everyone is trying to leave?
aug 25, 2025, 6:31 pm • 2 0 • view
Pam Bondi
aug 25, 2025, 6:35 pm • 2 0 • view
Thank you!!
aug 25, 2025, 6:55 pm • 1 0 • view
"See you soon," Judge Xinis says to the parties. And we're done. Thanks to all who followed along! If you appreciate live threads like this one, I hope you'll consider supporting our non-profit newsroom. See you soon! givebutter.com/journalism/a...
aug 25, 2025, 6:32 pm • 599 59 • view
Once again, thank you so much for live posting these court hearings, Anna! 🙏 The dedication to transparency is so needed & appreciated!!
aug 25, 2025, 6:33 pm • 128 4 • view
I second that, Ms. Bowe. Thanks for your reporting.👌
aug 25, 2025, 7:22 pm • 19 0 • view
Many thanks for your detailed reporting, Anna! 🦋🦋🇺🇦🇺🇦💙💙🌊🌊
aug 27, 2025, 12:05 am • 0 0 • view
Thanks, Anna! Great job. ❤️⚖️
aug 25, 2025, 9:00 pm • 0 0 • view
"for the record that DOJ objects to the court's findings" translation You Old Hippie Leftist Judges keep telling us NO and to UPHOLD our sworn Oath to the Constitution but we'll be FIRED BY OUR client if we do Our Oath is sent to back burner as Loyalty is Paramount
aug 25, 2025, 8:45 pm • 1 1 • view
Why the fuck is this man in custody.
aug 25, 2025, 6:39 pm • 3 0 • view
@unroll.skywriter.blue Unroll pls
aug 25, 2025, 9:04 pm • 1 1 • view
skywriter.blue/pages/did:pl...
aug 25, 2025, 10:29 pm • 1 1 • view
Second request @unroll.skywriter.blue Pls Unroll, thxs
aug 25, 2025, 10:06 pm • 0 0 • view
Good job as always. If you can please try to remember when live blogging these hearings, after abou half an hour 45 minutes start a new thread. leave a comment in the existing thread that a new thread has started. And thank you very much.
aug 25, 2025, 6:47 pm • 0 0 • view
Thank you!
aug 25, 2025, 6:37 pm • 2 0 • view
Thank you, Anna. Much appreciated.
aug 25, 2025, 11:36 pm • 1 0 • view
📌
aug 25, 2025, 7:24 pm • 0 0 • view
bsky.app/profile/nytp...
aug 25, 2025, 6:35 pm • 2 0 • view
this lawless clusterfuck proudly sponsored by SCOTUS.
aug 25, 2025, 6:43 pm • 3 0 • view
Thank you!! @unroll.skywriter.blue Thanks~
aug 25, 2025, 10:01 pm • 0 0 • view
The thread as a shareable webpage: https://skywriter.blue/pages/did:plc:t4x2ruk2qmob2b2cx55h4v7r/post/3lxaldnfyk22g.
aug 25, 2025, 10:01 pm • 0 0 • view
I’m really grateful for his legal team. Not a lawyer but as a dummy they seem like they are really doing a lot and fast. Judge Xinis too. Her making time for a call today etc. seems like a big deal.
aug 25, 2025, 6:50 pm • 4 0 • view
Thank you!!!!
aug 25, 2025, 6:50 pm • 1 0 • view
I'd feel more comfortable if Abrego-Garcia's attorney clearly records that meeting with Ensign.
aug 25, 2025, 6:35 pm • 6 0 • view
I’m nervous the judge warned Ensign only orally about not taking him out of the country.
aug 25, 2025, 7:58 pm • 8 0 • view
Everything Ensign says is qualified to indicate that he has no authority to make any assurances, and everything he says is based on his “understanding.” You can’t rely on anything he says.
aug 25, 2025, 7:41 pm • 12 1 • view
How can it be legal to send someone to a foreign country not their own??? Isn't it a death sentence?? This is despicable
aug 25, 2025, 6:52 pm • 8 0 • view
Not a lawyer but it seems to me that the next few hours are some of the most critical in America’s history — if the government removes Abrego Garcia from the US in direct defiance of Xinis’s order, we are well and truly past the Rubicon
aug 25, 2025, 6:35 pm • 33 3 • view
I mean, didn't this already happen when they removed him from the country against the judges orders?
aug 25, 2025, 7:01 pm • 16 0 • view
And then we get to stop listening as citizens to an illegal government. You don't get to defy cord orders and remain a legitimate Government and have to be listened to. You can't get the benefit of the courts to enforce shit on citizens at that point.
aug 25, 2025, 6:41 pm • 2 0 • view
@skyview.social unroll please.
aug 25, 2025, 7:41 pm • 0 0 • view
I’m unclear as to what findings have been made by Xinis for the gov’t to object to..what findings? The hearing set for Friday is intended to sort out evidence & facts for Xinis to make any decisions; so I’m perplexed as to why the gov’t would object to something/anything not yet actually decided.
aug 25, 2025, 9:49 pm • 2 0 • view
Xinis has a prior order still in effect, and there is a standing order, both amounting to “cannot deport Abrego before 4pm Wednesday. Those two are what Ensign objected to.
aug 26, 2025, 2:21 am • 2 0 • view
Drew Ensign will be the last one to realize that he is expendable when DOJ sends Abrego outside the U.S. again in violation of the judge’s order and Ensign gets criminal contempt. DOJ happy to sacrifice Ensign if it comes to it
aug 25, 2025, 6:41 pm • 44 8 • view
calling this the department of justice is a joke the fact is this isn't about justice at all and it's that in NAME ONLY nothing to do with justice it's corruption and thuggery
aug 27, 2025, 5:03 pm • 1 0 • view
Department of Oppression Management deeply regrets the error 👊🏻
aug 27, 2025, 5:39 pm • 0 0 • view
💯 You know that's right!
aug 25, 2025, 7:56 pm • 5 0 • view
Don't let the door hit you on the way out, Ensign.
aug 25, 2025, 6:32 pm • 12 0 • view
Gov says we don't like it,, and we are not going to listen to the courts ruling.
aug 25, 2025, 6:31 pm • 3 0 • view
The DOJ insists that Trump can do whatever he wants to whomever he wants and his actions are never reviewable by any judge. I cannot wait to see the first DOJ person to end up in jail for contempt, it is surely coming.
aug 25, 2025, 6:37 pm • 27 1 • view
She needs to write up that order NOW and send it NOW, via fax and email, to all parties. NOW.
aug 25, 2025, 8:47 pm • 3 0 • view
Good luck with that, DOJ.
aug 25, 2025, 6:32 pm • 2 0 • view
Ensign had to throw that in at the end becuase he is going to get an earful. The DOJ is so corrupt.
aug 25, 2025, 8:09 pm • 4 0 • view
So he's going to go back on everything he just said.
aug 25, 2025, 7:55 pm • 2 0 • view
Abrigos situation is literally Kafkaesque. The DOJ and ice just refuse to let this go even though he was swept up in an admitted administrative error. Pulled off the street, imprisoned, shuffled across courts, deported, brought back, charged, released, picked up, threatened with deportation again.
aug 25, 2025, 6:45 pm • 31 7 • view
I object for no reason in particular will really make the record clear on appeal.
aug 25, 2025, 9:25 pm • 4 0 • view
"the government objects on the basis you aren't giving us absolutely everything without a second thought, Your Honor"
aug 25, 2025, 9:38 pm • 3 0 • view
the process sure isn't 'due process'
aug 25, 2025, 6:34 pm • 0 0 • view
3 card monte is the govt's position.
aug 25, 2025, 6:30 pm • 2 0 • view
The government’s position is bad faith cruelty. I’ve seen nothing to the contrary.
aug 25, 2025, 6:31 pm • 10 0 • view
Thank you Anna
aug 25, 2025, 8:03 pm • 0 0 • view
this is so horrific I cannot even like it.
aug 25, 2025, 6:26 pm • 15 0 • view
Im not exactly sure what they are getting at here
aug 25, 2025, 6:27 pm • 1 0 • view
You can only move to reopen immigration cases once
aug 25, 2025, 6:27 pm • 8 0 • view
Thank you
aug 25, 2025, 6:28 pm • 1 0 • view
I would have taken a stone tablet to court and had the judge chisel her ruling on it.
aug 25, 2025, 6:25 pm • 4 0 • view
His client make my head…catch 🔥
aug 25, 2025, 7:19 pm • 0 0 • view
Why why why did Xinis ask this, when DOJ has lied about this issue before? And Ensign always states that he cannot speak for his client and will need to ask his client?
aug 25, 2025, 6:38 pm • 8 0 • view
She asked it so if they move him Ensign can be held in criminal contempt and jailed, which he should have been as soon as Boasburg found out he was in CECOT.
aug 25, 2025, 8:34 pm • 2 0 • view
That’s what I assumed, why she asked. But on appeal the Boasburg contempt finding was blocked. So, I guess ask anyway, just to make the DOJ lawyer say, effectively, that an oral order is sufficient.
aug 25, 2025, 8:42 pm • 0 0 • view
"do I need to write it down in small words for you so you can't pretend to misunderstand this time?"
aug 25, 2025, 8:03 pm • 0 0 • view
of course not Now they will say,, well she never put it in Writing so its not a legal order. like they did last time.
aug 25, 2025, 6:24 pm • 6 0 • view
This take on the operative sufficiency of an oral order is a rather bold one from Drew Ensign now that his former superior has been confirmed to the Third Circuit bench...
; [](CIV) Fwd: Advice to DHS Hi. Does this get us comfortable with the notice as drafted earlier with the addition of the removed from US airspace line? Drew will be the slash s and make the ECF filing even [//] Begin forwarded message: Roth, Yaakov M (CIV) // 3/16/25 2:26:48 PM Roth, Yaakov M (CIV) 3/16/25 2:26:48 PM Flentje, August (CIV) Cc: Reuveni, Erez R. (CIV); Ensign, Drew C (CIV) Advice to DHS I have been told by ODAG that the principal associate deputy attorney general advised DHS last night that the deplaning of the flights that had departed US airspace prior the court's minute order was permissible under the law and the court's order.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:o7ad7grtfxrmybroqi6dzl3k/bafkreicknrs7hfqqtr77ldlfespwowo66kox7j6x7guf7eczy6b6k4hyya@jpeg)
aug 25, 2025, 6:32 pm • 3 0 • view
tell that to Judge Boasberg (#2)
aug 25, 2025, 6:34 pm • 1 0 • view
If I were the judge, this question wouldn't be asked. The shady government lawyer would be told to have a seat while my clerk types up the order for my signature.
aug 25, 2025, 10:01 pm • 0 0 • view
But probably doesnt matter if in writing or oral, DOJ doesn't obey orders if they don't want to.
aug 25, 2025, 8:25 pm • 1 0 • view
Uh oh. Sure, they'll take oral order. Wish it were in writing.
aug 25, 2025, 8:24 pm • 0 0 • view
My view? Oral pronouncement is not enough. Not with this regime.
aug 25, 2025, 8:55 pm • 0 0 • view
Should have written it!
aug 25, 2025, 7:55 pm • 0 0 • view
Oral order wasn't sufficient when Boasberg ordered the planes to turn around, when this ordeal began in March . . .
aug 25, 2025, 6:25 pm • 11 2 • view
Exactly.
aug 25, 2025, 7:21 pm • 2 0 • view
I think it will happen this time, too.
aug 25, 2025, 9:29 pm • 2 0 • view
I’d think he’d want a written order just to protect himself from whatever the government might do next.
aug 26, 2025, 12:52 am • 0 0 • view
They've pulled this shit before. Xinis really ought to not let them even try to get away with it again.
aug 25, 2025, 6:25 pm • 9 1 • view
No! It's a trap! That's how they got Boasberg.
aug 25, 2025, 6:26 pm • 2 1 • view
How is Ensign still allowed to show up in court? Wasn’t there evidence via text between his co-counsels that he knowingly lied to Xinis in the previous Garcia suit?
aug 25, 2025, 6:41 pm • 3 0 • view
She did end up issuing written order, for anyone wondering. I think she knew exactly what she was doing asking that question. She got Ensign on record acknowledging oral order is binding.
aug 26, 2025, 2:49 am • 0 0 • view
NEW: A docket note memorializes Judge Xinis's oral order forbidding the govt from removing Kilmar Abrego Garcia from the United States or from the Virginia detention center where he is now being held. www.courtlistener.com/docket/71191...
aug 26, 2025, 2:50 am • 0 0 • view
Who is his client?
aug 25, 2025, 7:46 pm • 0 0 • view
Completely valid question with Ensign. Xinis learned from Boasberg’s “error.”
aug 25, 2025, 11:16 pm • 0 0 • view
What more does the judge need to witness in this country to know she absolutely should issue a written order!
aug 25, 2025, 6:35 pm • 0 0 • view
Written or oral doesn't matter. They will still do what they want to do.
aug 26, 2025, 4:14 pm • 0 0 • view
Has he already been moved, why arent they fighting this
aug 25, 2025, 6:23 pm • 1 0 • view
Is it though????
aug 25, 2025, 6:22 pm • 18 0 • view
Of course not
aug 25, 2025, 6:23 pm • 6 0 • view
If he's wrong (as many of us suspect), he's the one who should be heavily sanctioned. I'm surprised the judge even gave them the opportunity; I would have done a written order right then and there and not let anyone leave until they had copies in their hands.
aug 25, 2025, 6:25 pm • 9 3 • view
The Fascist regime will remove him tonight
aug 25, 2025, 6:23 pm • 3 0 • view
Ensign is an a**hole. Who is his “client”?
aug 25, 2025, 7:34 pm • 1 0 • view
Because they will remove him from the country tonight. thats the plan.
aug 25, 2025, 6:21 pm • 17 1 • view
Based on past actions, he is not acting in good faith.
aug 25, 2025, 6:21 pm • 44 1 • view
Which is why Xinis making this an extremely narrow order. She's already been burned by Ensign, Trump DOJ has zero courtesy given to it from now on
aug 25, 2025, 9:13 pm • 16 0 • view
It would not be shocking to me at all if they moved him tonight anyway. Their conduct in these cases has been geared towards figuring out how far the judiciary will let them go. So far, thanks to the SCOTUS, the answer has been “as far as they want.”
aug 25, 2025, 7:18 pm • 9 1 • view
Such complete bullshit & disregard for the court!!
aug 25, 2025, 9:41 pm • 0 0 • view
Translation: He’s being moved tonight. How many times will they misrepresent the circumstances to the judges before they are held to account? So if this man is disappeared tonight, then what? All because the government keeps lying, making material mistakes, have been caught doing that.
aug 25, 2025, 6:48 pm • 20 4 • view
Order him returned to Maryland!
aug 25, 2025, 6:20 pm • 20 3 • view
WHY IS HE NOT BEING RELEASED RIGHT THE FUCK NOW??? I AM SO SICK OF THIS. MARYLANDERS GET OUT ON THE STREETS NOW. DEMAND KILMAR BACK IN MARYLAND NOW!
aug 25, 2025, 6:53 pm • 13 3 • view
If they are unable to meet with client it should default to plaintiff.
aug 25, 2025, 10:27 pm • 0 0 • view
Can’t Xinis just forbid it?
aug 25, 2025, 6:42 pm • 6 0 • view
bsky.app/profile/josh...
aug 25, 2025, 9:54 pm • 2 0 • view
Thanks!
aug 25, 2025, 10:37 pm • 1 0 • view
I think she did, but Executive Branch might choose to break the law anyway.
aug 25, 2025, 7:51 pm • 6 1 • view
Counsel does have authorization to inform client of what the court orders? Should go over well.
aug 25, 2025, 6:22 pm • 9 1 • view
Can Xinis put DOJ lawyers in jail if Abrego Garcia is deported?
aug 25, 2025, 10:56 pm • 0 0 • view
She can but she’s been trying hard over the entire ordeal to not take things that far with regard to representatives of the federal government. Is there a danger if she jails lawyers for contempt that the whole set of cases gets appealed upwards and she ends up as no longer the judge?
aug 25, 2025, 11:22 pm • 1 0 • view
Uh huh. Riiiiiiiigggghhhtttt. He's in the paddy wagon right now. We all know it.
aug 25, 2025, 7:41 pm • 1 0 • view