You stripped out the qualifiers to invent something I absolutely and specifically did not say. I'm sorry, but this is not a reading comprehension problem. This is a character deficit.
You stripped out the qualifiers to invent something I absolutely and specifically did not say. I'm sorry, but this is not a reading comprehension problem. This is a character deficit.
Still haven't read it, eh? Any pics in the article? Maybe have someone else read it to you if you're struggling this much.
Yes I have and yes there are. There's also a section about the company pivoting to whatever it does now after its original investment thesis fell flat. Oh, and they're in San Francisco. Strip out the names and even people working there would be hard-pressed to identify the company.
Seriously, when you're not being a piece of trash by twisting what people say (or just editing out the inconvenient bits) what do you actually think was being *sold* here? And to who? Again, there's virtually nothing about the product. They're not pitching secure employment. Investment? Maybe?
My god, your confidence in your stupidity is exhausting. Go pathetically kiss ass somewhere else, I can't waste any more time trying to explain simple facts to someone incapable of understanding them.
Is the factual statement you made and explained in the room with us now?
Here's another question; are you *sure* I'm here to defend anyone? Or am I simply the kind of person who enjoys attacking demonstrable pieces of shit for sport? Spoiler: it's the latter, and a lawyer (lol) who is willfully sloppy about citations and definitions is a *super* juicy target.