avatar
Felonious Monk @alexqgb.bsky.social

You stripped out the qualifiers to invent something I absolutely and specifically did not say. I'm sorry, but this is not a reading comprehension problem. This is a character deficit.

aug 21, 2025, 7:35 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
Underachiever @whiskeyblackout.bsky.social

Still haven't read it, eh? Any pics in the article? Maybe have someone else read it to you if you're struggling this much.

aug 21, 2025, 7:42 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Felonious Monk @alexqgb.bsky.social

Yes I have and yes there are. There's also a section about the company pivoting to whatever it does now after its original investment thesis fell flat. Oh, and they're in San Francisco. Strip out the names and even people working there would be hard-pressed to identify the company.

aug 21, 2025, 7:47 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Felonious Monk @alexqgb.bsky.social

Seriously, when you're not being a piece of trash by twisting what people say (or just editing out the inconvenient bits) what do you actually think was being *sold* here? And to who? Again, there's virtually nothing about the product. They're not pitching secure employment. Investment? Maybe?

aug 21, 2025, 7:55 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Underachiever @whiskeyblackout.bsky.social

My god, your confidence in your stupidity is exhausting. Go pathetically kiss ass somewhere else, I can't waste any more time trying to explain simple facts to someone incapable of understanding them.

aug 21, 2025, 7:57 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Felonious Monk @alexqgb.bsky.social

Is the factual statement you made and explained in the room with us now?

aug 21, 2025, 8:04 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Felonious Monk @alexqgb.bsky.social

Here's another question; are you *sure* I'm here to defend anyone? Or am I simply the kind of person who enjoys attacking demonstrable pieces of shit for sport? Spoiler: it's the latter, and a lawyer (lol) who is willfully sloppy about citations and definitions is a *super* juicy target.

aug 21, 2025, 8:28 pm • 0 0 • view