avatar
Luke Kawa @ljkawa.bsky.social

Their ipo was not a 180d expiry, had different terms

sep 2, 2025, 5:31 pm • 1 0

Replies

avatar
Nero Wolfe @nero-wolfe.bsky.social

Very odd. I haven’t read the S-1 but will need to check it out. I’ve been wondering if lockups would loosen up after Slack v. Pirani but kinda assumed it would happen through waivers.

sep 2, 2025, 5:34 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Luke Kawa @ljkawa.bsky.social

been on this for a bit sherwood.news/markets/why-...

sep 2, 2025, 5:48 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Luke Kawa @ljkawa.bsky.social

Circle’s recent post-IPO secondary was basically providing a liquidity event for major holders too, based on the terms of its prospectus

sep 2, 2025, 5:49 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Nero Wolfe @nero-wolfe.bsky.social

Very interesting. Based on the UWs/UWC for Coreweave, I wouldn’t be surprised if their lockup term becomes a new market standard.

sep 2, 2025, 5:56 pm • 0 0 • view