Their ipo was not a 180d expiry, had different terms
Their ipo was not a 180d expiry, had different terms
Very odd. I haven’t read the S-1 but will need to check it out. I’ve been wondering if lockups would loosen up after Slack v. Pirani but kinda assumed it would happen through waivers.
been on this for a bit sherwood.news/markets/why-...
Circle’s recent post-IPO secondary was basically providing a liquidity event for major holders too, based on the terms of its prospectus
Very interesting. Based on the UWs/UWC for Coreweave, I wouldn’t be surprised if their lockup term becomes a new market standard.