avatar
Jake Gold @jacob.gold

Yeah, I wouldn’t try to use hashtags as communities. That’s not what Reddit did either. Hashtags were an interesting hack but too minimal to solve the communities problem we had on Twitter and have inherited with Bluesky.

aug 26, 2025, 1:17 am • 4 0

Replies

avatar
Andrew F @aftd.dev

The pieces for a Reddit-style community in bsky feel almost there? Hashtags + custom feeds + Discover-style "less like this" feedback + custom moderation. Issue right now is you have to cobble it together. Like, Blacksky is doing that but not sure who else is.

aug 26, 2025, 5:05 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Andrew F @aftd.dev

Also, creating a custom feed from hashtags and exact word matching feels like it should be built into the app itself and not something you need something like skyfeed for?

aug 26, 2025, 5:05 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Jake Gold @jacob.gold

Yeah there is some kind of version of this already but it needs strong product support to flourish. Feeds could be enhanced to do it. They should probably play a role. But it’s probably just better to make an explicit thing to create the exact experience we need.

aug 26, 2025, 5:42 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
verdverm @verdverm.com

In app feeds could also create lockin if the controls / logic / definition are not portable. Even so, I do not think I can migrate my @graze.social to another provider They each provide a different set of knobs and ux, even though the viewing is consistent. Maybe a @lexicon.community "standard"?

aug 26, 2025, 6:12 am • 3 1 • view
avatar
Fricker @fricker.bsky.social

#bb27

aug 26, 2025, 8:43 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Chris Messina @chrismessina.me

Curious... Given the constraints (e.g. 140 characters and SMS), how would you have solved the problem differently?

aug 26, 2025, 4:22 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Jake Gold @jacob.gold

I think the Twitter product was good enough to compete until 2012 or so. And by then SMS wasn’t popular and they could have abandoned it and its limitations safely. I think namespaces e.g. sub-Twitters was the obvious and correct solution. For same reason subreddits made Reddit so sticky.

aug 26, 2025, 5:37 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Jake Gold @jacob.gold

aug 26, 2025, 5:39 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Chris Messina @chrismessina.me

It appears that you're sidestepping the point of my question. Twitter launched "proper" communities in 2021 (they still exist). No one I know uses them. Why do you think these are the correct solution when they were tried and seem to have failed?

aug 26, 2025, 5:48 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Jake Gold @jacob.gold

From your question it seemed like you were asking about the old days. Simple answer is that Twitter did a bad job with Communities. They didn't care or didn't understand what they were doing. It's easy to launch something that, on paper, sounds right but is way off. See: Google Video vs YouTube.

aug 26, 2025, 5:57 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Chris Messina @chrismessina.me

I agree with your point about copying community infra badly. -- This conversation is challenging because we're bouncing around in timeframes, constraints, and considerations. -- I originally addressed your critique of the hashtag and asked what you would have proposed in 2007.

aug 26, 2025, 7:19 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Jake Gold @jacob.gold

I think the hashtag was a fun hack and did provide utility at the time. Lots of times these kinds of hacks/emergent behaviors are signs that a product is missing some good feature. Just like ad-hoc @ and RTs got turned into core features, so should have interest-based communities been productized.

aug 26, 2025, 7:54 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
Jim 🔥 @jim.chat

Super interesting thread. My 2¢ - I'm not sure folk open BlueSky/Twitter for the same reason/vibe/exp that folk open Reddit (or FB). Porting features or trying to homogenise doesn't seem wise. Hashtags fit a microblog vibe: emergent, quick, easy. Communities are intentional + for elsewhere.

aug 27, 2025, 6:02 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Jim 🔥 @jim.chat

For clarity, what I'm trying to say is about 'intention' ... One joins a subreddit / FB Groups / forums – with subject-matter intention. The intention (for most, I suggest) on bsky/tw is more vicarious, curious, serendipitous. That's why Twitter communities failed. Horses for courses etc. 🖖

aug 27, 2025, 6:02 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Mike Beasley @mikebeas.com

You could not be more wrong about this. That’s not what people wanted from Twitter. Nobody joined Twitter saying “I can’t wait to join a small community of individuals who are one particular interest.” Twitter was about braindumping whatever you were thinking about on any topic into a firehose.

aug 26, 2025, 8:53 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Jake Gold @jacob.gold

I'm much less interested in what twitter "was" than what it could have been, had it kept evolving. Twitter completely failed to achieve strong retention and mainstream adoption, the way Reddit/YouTube/Instagram did. There were posts like the following for a many years without any meaningful fixes:

aug 26, 2025, 9:16 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Jake Gold @jacob.gold

You seem to think users will tell you how to evolve a product. That's not how it works. Users identify problems, often in confusing ways, and then you (as the app developer) develop solutions. Users are busy, don't know all the options, lack the necessary context, and it's not their damn job.

aug 26, 2025, 9:16 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Chris Messina @chrismessina.me

Users will tell you how to evolve a product no matter what. Product design is the process of assimilating all of these requests and mashing them through constraints, while also maintaining an eye towards overall coherence and usability. As a product leader, I wouldn't outsource my role to users.

aug 26, 2025, 10:53 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Kuba Suder 🇵🇱🇺🇦 @mackuba.eu

Wait no, but I'm talking about how *gestures around* feels like in 2025, things weren't like this in 2018

aug 26, 2025, 9:18 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Jake Gold @jacob.gold

The issues were different/less crazy but the chaotic nature of Twitter was the same. No one really enjoys the disorganized chaos. Some just tolerate it better. One example: since Twitter launched users had been asking for a way to follow someone for only specific topics they were interested in.

aug 26, 2025, 9:23 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Mike Beasley @mikebeas.com

your assumption that this is a problem that needs fixing as incorrect. It’s just the way things are. it’s not a product problem. simply an observation.

aug 26, 2025, 9:20 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Jake Gold @jacob.gold

aug 26, 2025, 9:25 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Kuba Suder 🇵🇱🇺🇦 @mackuba.eu

I partially agree with both of you 😉 The "everyone in one room" aspect of Twitter was indeed its strong point, and it's why I've been using Twitter until last year and why I like Bluesky now, and why I've only used Reddit for some periods of time in some specific topics (ehem, crypto)

aug 26, 2025, 9:57 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Kuba Suder 🇵🇱🇺🇦 @mackuba.eu

But also Jake is right that often I only want to read some topics that someone is posting about and not others, but I can only follow them completely or not at all… so I think there is some space for some topic categorization if done right.

aug 26, 2025, 9:59 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
Kuba Suder 🇵🇱🇺🇦 @mackuba.eu

Could outline hashtags do it? 😉 Maybe, who knows? But also I don't want fully separate "community subreddits" like the Twitter Communities, because for a lot of people I do actually want to read everything they are posting on any topic, that's how you expand beyond your current interests

aug 26, 2025, 10:01 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
verdverm @verdverm.com

I'm working on building out this capability and building my own feeds. See my github.com/blebbit/at-m... project But first, "permissioned spaces" via my patches here: github.com/blebbit/atpr...

aug 26, 2025, 10:10 pm • 1 0 • view