Tesla "full self-driving" is fraud in the same sense that Theranos and Elizabeth Holmes committed fraud.
Tesla "full self-driving" is fraud in the same sense that Theranos and Elizabeth Holmes committed fraud.
💯
Yes, but against more people and with more deaths.
I’m always amazed when they call it that and it isn’t that.
I think that’s why he smashed the regulatory agencies that would have slowed down or stopped its release.
They can't get humans to drive them any more...why would it want to drive itself?
Perpetually a year or two away and also we need TRAINS and SUBWAYS not self driving cars
Agreed.
This is not only bullshit, it is obvious bullshit, cause it is clear that there are a lot of self driving cars and trucks out their, so it is quite possible that tesla will get its act together and produce a self driving car roughly equivalent to waymo or whatever geez
For Elon?
Ok Tesla and Musk committed fraud. Got it.
They state in plain language on their website when you opt in for it that it's currently a beta, is still in development, and may not ever leave beta testing.
That's not what Elon has been saying in public and in investor calls and the beta doesnt produce full self driving either and cant so its still a lie.
Public "marketing" statements rarely meet the legal threshold of being a binding statement. Try again. I'm all for bashing Tesla, but if we don't stick to true and verifiable facts, then we're just as bad as the MAGA dipshits.
Its a fact Tesla claimed its cars possess full self-driving capability and marketed that to customers and none of Teslas products have full self-driving capabilities.
And on their website when you select the option to add it, it gives you a disclaimer in plain language that the technology is not yet "complete", and IF/when it is, your vehicle will receive it as an OTA update (or you can opt into the beta and have access to it as-is now).
Ok so they have admitted on their website Musk and much of their marketing and sales materals lie about their products FSD capabilities.
In marketing, they can say whatever they want. As long as the facts are made clear before the purchase is completed. Just like how Trump was allowed to file 60+ lawsuits about 2020, but when it came time for his legal team to stand in front of a judge, they didn't have a damn thing to say.
That is 100% false, which is exactly why the class action lawsuit against Tesla was cleared. A class action lawsuit is a different animal than one person filing SLAPP suits.
Tesla won't get their act together because Elmo thinks he knows better (typical hubris) and is trying to cheap out with camera 'technology' rather than lidar. Ever notice all the extra equipment on a Waymo?
Still fraud
Just because there are competitors doing it doesn’t mean Tesla’s success is guaranteed. Elon removed lidar from Teslas years ago, and there’s no way in hell they’re going to catch up to Waymo with cameras alone. It’s always been vaporware coming “later this year.” That’s the obvious bullshit here.
The problem is Tesla has doubled (tripled? quadrupled?) down on cameras only. Everybody else (I think there’s one other exception), agrees LiDAR etc. are necessary for self-driving. Tesla has to reboot its approach to be competitive.
Cameras for self-driving is one of the dumbest ideas ever conceived. But he was trying to save money at the expense of driver safety.
Squinting at the argument, the rationalization was humans drive with just vision (with variance in how well they do it, ofc), I understand how we reasonably ended up here. I think the mistake was not understanding the approach was insufficient with existing vision technology.
You are absolutely correct
Did Theranos kill anyone? (Really asking, I might not know the whole story.) Because "full self-driving" definitely did.
Tesla Fakedrive has a higher body count than Theranos. At least so far.
Except that we surely won’t be seeing Musk go to prison…
And somehow he’s going to populate Mars in a few short years - sure dude sure
He can't get one Starship to orbit, let alone 10 tanker versions to refuel a Mars bound ship.
Both monstrous considering they put lives at risk
I'm going to assume that's real fraud because Elon Musk is a grifter and a Nazi piece of shit, but I don't get the reference.
elizabeth holmes told investors she invented a box that would do a full blood test with one drop of blood. the boxes didn't work, she programmed them to stall out "thinking" and they used the time to run actual blood to actual clinics and presented those as faked theranos results. she's in jail now
So are most political leaders in the violent political party.
Not to mention Tesla's continue to run over motorcycles in HOV lanes.
Only Waymo has "full self-driving" and they are much more realistic about it's limitations precisely because they're actually trying to do it, rather than just pulling a marketing ploy.
Facts!
Hasn't Waymo killed a bunch of pedestrians already?
Self-driving cars will always do that, which is why they need to be wholly opposed.
Meanwhile humans are getting run over all the time by people and no one bats an eye.
Personally, I think the greatest benefit of self-driving cars is that - without a sympathetic human driver behind the wheel - people will be much more willing to punish a corporation for actually breaking traffic rules and hurting others.
lataco.com/waymo-traffi...
Precisely. Waymo cars that aren't hurting anyone draw this much ire while human drivers in LA kill over 300 people a year and you can't even get speed limits reduced.
I am that annoying driver (when I drive) that goes slightly under the speed limit so that our city traffic engineer can lower our speed limits (under CA law and car-brained elected officials that can fire him). It shouldn't be this hard to lower speed limits
No one has ever been killed by a Waymo. They are, in-fact, demonstrably safer drivers than humans.
You cant say that, yet. Humans can and do drive *anywhere* and in any weather or any terrain damn near anywhere on Earth. Waymo cant and hasn't so we dont have enough information to make that claim yet.
Fair point. They're safer than humans in certain situations, and less safe in others.
Agreed.
It has killed zero pedestrians
It hasn't. There was one fatality involving a Waymo that stopped when it was hit by human driven car going way too fast. But Waymo was pretty clearly not at fault. www.nbcbayarea.com/investigatio...
Oh, there was a lady hit by an Uber self driving car. Maybe that's the one you're thinking of. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_o...
A Cruise hit a lady and dragged her about 100 feet. Thats what ultimately got their license to operate pull. But anyone living in SF from 2019-2023 could tell you Waymo was much safer.
But that is still wrong because the only appropriate way to employ self driving cars is not to, ever, under any circumstances.
That's obviously not true. Humans are horrible drivers and once computers can do a better job, every human driver it replaces is a boon for pedestrians, cyclists and everyone else using the road.
I bike in SF all the time. I'm honestly much more comfortable around a Waymo than a human driver.
💯
How? His cars have self driving?
Her machines ran a handful of tests. His cars claim full autonomy but require human supervision. Same scam
How? Explain why self-driving, which we can observe to be a workable feature in teslas, is a scam
It’s called full self driving and it’s not fully self driven.
yeah, cause we aren't there yet technologically.
Waymo seems to be there
Ok so Musk claiming Tesla has that capability *now* or in the past is fraud. Agreed 🤝
They dont have self-driving.
Self driving is literally one of their features, maybe it's not "fully" self driving but it's self driving nonetheless.
There's a reason the other carmakers DON'T call it self-driving, because unless it's fully self-driving (autonomous), it's legally not GM- Super Cruise Ford - BlueCruise BMW - Highway Assistant Mercedes - Drive Pilot Volvo - Pilot Assist Hyundai - Highway Driving Assist Nissan - ProPilot Assist ...
Theranos was funnier because she ripped off the likes of Kissinger. And that's the only thing she got convicted of, not the medical fraud... So #FreeElizabethHolmes I guess...
Can we just jail Elmo Skum too, please? They both deserve it!!
Not quite. I use it daily and rarely intervene.
Funny how its the woman CEO who gets punished*. *Rightfully so, but SO SHOULD THE MALE CEOS COMMITTING FRAUD
It’s a California tradition.
The problem with self driving cars is that they have no survival instincts or incentives. What do they care if they get wrapped around a concrete pillar?
Thats because they are incapable of understanding how the universe works.
🤝
Bet!
100%. And yet one of them lost everything and is sitting in prison while the other is the richest person in the world with an ever-growing empire. Funny how life works out.
Call it what it is. Junk
That was my whole Twitter account. I documented that she lied on the stand multiple times using her own exhibits entered into at trial. She used the fake voice through the entire trial, then admitted it was fake just before prison. Musk is exactly the same but had a bit of luck.
All of Silicon Valley is fraud now. Just don't buy anything coming out of there.
Note to self: refund my blockchain certification.
Musk chose money (paypal) and, once he saw the opportunity, cars (tesla), items that most could identify with, to run his scams. But yes, they are very similar individuals.
Almost ready to hear that Tesla's self-driving technology was just a bunch of underpaid Phillipinos with a remote link to the car's camera and an Xbox controller. Except that would probably be much safer.
🤣🤣🤣 ROTFLMBAO! Sir, you made my night after a crappy day on the first day of school! Thank you!🤣
The clown lies all the time while the media and his fan boys swallow the fibs. He watched The Matrix and started blabbing about living in a simulation. He watched iRobot and promised the lemmings Tesla Robots by June 2025. June 2025 came and went with no comments from the media about his lies.