I think the comment is just to provide context, right? Dont be offended by context and facts, we need to keep both in mind while we are getting angry or we become the monster we rage against. They have neither context nor facts, and that is how we are where we are. Never fear those, but verify.
I'm not "offended" by their comment, I'm wondering what the point was. What difference does it make if it's "statewide" or if it's to appease the person running the State? allow this to happen in 2 libraries and it WILL become statewide.
It's easier to communicate your concern to the opposition without appearing to embellish the truth. You know, using facts over narrative.
Right, because when they can say you exaggerated on one issue, they dismiss all else that you have to say as overreacting. So, always argue with facts in your pocket. Facts are the point, and also a nice pointy weapon.
sure, and the fact of the matter is that the head of the state is giving these orders.
And how many libraries have complied? How was the order issued?
how is it an exaggeration, though? the governor of the state is giving directives, and the libraries are following his orders.
What percentage of libraries have removed the book? Two out of how many?
who is giving the orders, the libraries, or the guy who runs the State?
What came first, the chicken or the egg?
so you think the libraries, who are doing this in order to comply with the governor's demands, did it first? get your head out of your ass
No, I think you're a troll and a waste of my time. ✌️