I never claimed they were or should be doing law enforcement work. The exact opposite. I have to believe you understand fully well what I was saying as it is a pretty commonly held and a waiver view as well as described in detail further in the threads. And one that both the OP and others
Basically all agree with except for some weird semantic or circular discussion point people want to pretend to have.
I know that. I'm just saying you're fundamentally missing the original point about people's unwillingness to do *law enforcement work* in the US while unarmed. If you want to say that social workers should be called before cops in many situations, that's fine, but it's a separate argument.