avatar
Flying Mezerkis @bananapantz.bsky.social

A lot of people are mentioning that. I guess I would say he might have been representative of a broader movement. And I hate Rush. But as influential as he was. He wasn’t shifting the national view this much.

sep 1, 2025, 2:59 pm • 2 0

Replies

avatar
Tammaye @tammaye.com

Zooming out - 1987 abolition of the Fairness Doctrine. I’d bet good money on this one. Fox News came 9 years later.

sep 1, 2025, 3:03 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Elizabeth Grattan @egrattan.bsky.social

That policy is irrelevant here.

sep 1, 2025, 3:07 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Elizabeth Grattan @egrattan.bsky.social

And FNC is cable.

sep 1, 2025, 3:08 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Tammaye @tammaye.com

Aware.

sep 1, 2025, 3:17 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Elizabeth Grattan @egrattan.bsky.social

Clearly you aren’t if you think FCC policies are relevant to FNC.

sep 1, 2025, 3:19 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Tammaye @tammaye.com

Can you explain why?

sep 1, 2025, 3:17 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Flying Mezerkis @bananapantz.bsky.social

Because cable doesn’t have to abide by that rule.

sep 1, 2025, 3:18 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Elizabeth Grattan @egrattan.bsky.social

He doesn’t even know what that rule was.

sep 1, 2025, 3:19 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Elizabeth Grattan @egrattan.bsky.social

Because it wasn’t what you pretend it was.

sep 1, 2025, 3:17 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Two all the way, a coffee milk, and a Del's @ri.oldfolkshome.org

Because the FD didn’t and couldn’t apply to cable and FN is cable. Also, the FD did a lot less than the BlueSky “ooooo! FD!” crowd thinks it did. Limbaugh wouldn’t have had to have changed a single thing about his show and stations could comply with FD with like 2hrs/week of off-hours programming.

sep 1, 2025, 10:47 pm • 4 0 • view