?? I only sent it to illustrate scarcity of males in 20-25 age bracket.. my point 4% of 25-50 age bracket still valid.. they got plenty of males aged 35-45 to spare...
?? I only sent it to illustrate scarcity of males in 20-25 age bracket.. my point 4% of 25-50 age bracket still valid.. they got plenty of males aged 35-45 to spare...
And ? Oh you think i talk about the military ? No i talk about everything. Braindrain, dead essential worker. Russia has nobody to spare and is loosing them regardless. A sociaty that discourages woman from work is even more in danger by loosing a ton of man.
yes.. considered only mil-pop.. right now in RU, w/40% budget spent in war, nothing mush else is wort considering...
Of cause it is. It would be stupid not to. Because economy and sociaty are needed to support the war. A war is not only won with guns in hands.
Also i gues Rudsia wants to have a Russia after that war. With ... an economy and ... people and ... well a better situation than before the war xD
sorry, I fully disagree.. their aim is territorial expansion beyond USSR limits, NOT prosperity.. & RU never cared @ its people.. their official declaration (medvedev): RU from Lisbon to Vladivostok, at any price..!
Than you just dont know what you are talking about.
bsky.app/profile/noel...
That has nothing to do with my statement. AGAIN! send me shut that proves your point or dont.
what do you think my point is?
Many people means losses not bad. Basicly.
of course.. only you do apparently...
A country is more than its military.
sure.. but for RU nothing else matters for now...