None of which indicates either pressure in the court or tat the court would be influenced. Fortunately we aren't America with its politically appointed judges. I repeat the act should have been amended.
None of which indicates either pressure in the court or tat the court would be influenced. Fortunately we aren't America with its politically appointed judges. I repeat the act should have been amended.
The SC has already been under scrutiny for giving the impression of being pressured into following political whims under the last government. static1.squarespace.com/static/6033d...
Measures to prevent any impression of interference but the report itself only refers to "the appearance of" rather than actual. I repeat the govt would have been made to want this outcome.
The actions of this government for the past year suggest they enjoy creating stupid outcomes. They bungled dealing with Southport fallout, leading to riots. Refugee crossings have been left to the far-right to create a narrative. Incompetent handling of transport policy. It goes on.
A government with a solid Commons majority is currently looking at losing the next election with a Reform majority of 44. They'd be mad to try and be Diet Farage, but here we are. They are doing everything to appease the far-right who will never vote Labour whilst alienating anyone left of Reform.
Full report: www.icdr.co.uk/news/judicia... It's just false to suggest our MPs aren't driving the judiciary in a subservient direction. "Enemies of the People" originated from politicians briefing the Daily Mail.