Article worth reading by Alexander Motyl in The National Security Journal. It references the conversation I had with Paul Krugman about the weakness in military analysis today. nationalsecurityjournal.org/why-the-expe...
Article worth reading by Alexander Motyl in The National Security Journal. It references the conversation I had with Paul Krugman about the weakness in military analysis today. nationalsecurityjournal.org/why-the-expe...
๐
I haven't followed specific people consistently since the early days but I got the impression that there were several waves of pessimism and optimism. Currently it's again more pessimism. But for a while there was a lot of optimism, maybe even too much, among the experts.
1. Only thing I question is the idea that Trump is somehow clever in getting what he wants. I think he's just a brazen man enabled by lickspittles and gifted with a powerful military and economic engine.
2. Nothing subtle about it. I don't think Trump is being humiliated by Putin. I think the two of them are on the same page; why would Trump feel humiliated when he wants to do exactly what Putin wants to do?
I wonder about the sources of the comments at the conclusion of the article...as in where from.
"In any great organization it is far, far safer to be wrong with the majority than to be right alone". John Kenneth Galbraith. Unfortunately, it seems that States and International Organizations (UN, EU...) don't want to have staff with real understanding of Ukraine, serving in Ukraine.
We must push ๐ท๐บ over the edge !! #RussiaIsATerroristState committing a full-scale genocide in plain sight. It is our duty towards Humanity to help ๐บ๐ฆ win the war. Whatever victory takes, right now ๐ฅ #SlavaUkraรฏni ๐ฑ๐น๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฑ๐ธ๐ช๐ซ๐ฎ๐ต๐ฑ๐ซ๐ท๐ฉ๐ช๐ฎ๐น๐ช๐บ๐ฌ๐ง๐ณ๐ด๐จ๐ฆโ๐บ๐ฆ