I'm not saying it's *impressive*, I'm saying it's not a scandalous story. It's just a story, it's just normal journalistic work. The only reason people are fighting about it is because she is a weird person online lol

You're right, it isn't scandalous, yet Lorenz seems to think it is.

And get desire to make it so is why she isn't a great journalist.

You know I'm just gonna say it's concerning to me all the guys I'm fighting on here tonight who purport to be good Democrats are doing so much work to be exclusionary and to gatekeep. Kind of gets back to my original point.

Because I think Lorenz sees conspiracies everywhere? That her shit talking affects her work? Because I think she's a shit journalist? That's exclusionary? OK.

You told me I'm not a Democrat because we disagree lol

And yet, that was not where you choose to write that response, you did so after I pointed out that what Lorenz wrote is not the scandalous affair she seems to think it is.

And of course, what I actually said was that you weren't a Democrat because you seemed to really dislike them.

How is that different than what I said?

I'm saying you're drawing lines in the sand over these issues and I think that's a problem within our party, especially when *electeds* do it!

Dislike and dissent are different things. I believe I explained this to you already.