I don’t think comparing Neil to RFK Jr and Hegseth is really helpful to the conversation or in anyway proportional. Do you?
I don’t think comparing Neil to RFK Jr and Hegseth is really helpful to the conversation or in anyway proportional. Do you?
Unless, of course, we’re implicitly comparing viruses to homes other than detached single family
Let’s ask that question first of Neil’s opening remark: Is it helpful or honest to characterize the majority of the residents of The Nations as being “against change,” when almost all of them approved parts of CM. Horton’s bill …
That’s called deflection. You don’t get to change my question. You also placed something in quotes that’s not a direct quote of Neil’s.
The deflection is yours, Ms. Pechan—twice. Firstly, you overlooked the sleazy, demonizing spin in Neil’s original remark while jumping on my highlighting of the sleaze, and now you evade my question by claiming that my quote isn’t “direct,” simply because I substituted the noun for the pronoun.
Ha! No, sir. Again, you don’t get to decide what I should focus on and that it should be Neil and not you. You engage in bad faith, so I won’t engage. Have a good day.
The bad faith is also yours. I never told you what you should focus on, just that your foci were deflections--exactly what you said to me. (By the way, I knew that you would never criticize Neil. There's a lot of lockstep among the BEBEs.) A good day to you as well.
… (the DADUs and more trees) but simply didn’t want a radical re-zoning which would place hundreds of modest, sometimes historic, houses at risk of the bulldozer and replaced by ten units stacked on every quarter-acre of a lot?