Historically it would just force more brutal repression until the critical point (most likely starvation) forces some sort of revolutionary action. So if you’re going for an accelerationist angle, I get it and carry on.
Historically it would just force more brutal repression until the critical point (most likely starvation) forces some sort of revolutionary action. So if you’re going for an accelerationist angle, I get it and carry on.
look around, i think they chose acceleration for us. If we can force terms more beneficial to our side, we should.
I’m not opposed to acceleration necessarily. In fact, I don’t see any viable strategy that doesn’t incorporate it. I just have too many humanist Marxist sensibilities still to at least not perform a bit of reluctance regarding it, tbh.