avatar
Dan Brogan @danbrogan.bsky.social

Is it wrong to ask—as the reporter did not, or at least didn’t put it in the article—what a nuclear reactor on the moon would be for? Other than to be first, which I suppose is reason enough.

aug 4, 2025, 9:35 pm • 34 1

Replies

avatar
bawfuls.bsky.social @bawfuls.bsky.social

It’s important to try to catch up to the milestones established in the AppleTV series For All Mankind

aug 4, 2025, 9:45 pm • 32 0 • view
avatar
harper ∞ @harpersgold.bsky.social

A moon base would need a power plant

aug 4, 2025, 10:22 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Dan Brogan @danbrogan.bsky.social

Maybe, even probably, the reason. But the article could throw a sentence or two about why that’s not just a standalone goal. Of course, that would require semi-responsible journalism, which is not what we do anymore.

aug 4, 2025, 11:31 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
harper ∞ @harpersgold.bsky.social

I have such mixed feelings. I was a teenager when the ISS was first built, and I remember being so excited and overjoyed that the USA and Russia were working together to explore space for the benefit of human understanding.

aug 5, 2025, 1:37 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
harper ∞ @harpersgold.bsky.social

I would love to see a moon base for its research and exploration possibilities... but I do NOT want to return to cold war attitudes where space exploration is used as a pissing contest between politicians 😑

aug 5, 2025, 1:37 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Dan Brogan @danbrogan.bsky.social

It’s all pissing contests now.

aug 5, 2025, 1:41 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
atreides nuts @afivegantenna.bsky.social

i feel like maybe they thought this would speak for itself: The first country to have a reactor could “declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States,” the directive states, a sign of the agency’s concern about a joint project China and Russia have launched.

aug 5, 2025, 2:30 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
atreides nuts @afivegantenna.bsky.social

the purpose is Lunar Warfare

aug 5, 2025, 2:30 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
cclark557.bsky.social @cclark557.bsky.social

You got to have power for a ballroom. How could they build a ballroom on the moon without a nuclear reactor? Might power a McDonalds too.

aug 4, 2025, 10:29 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
chuckles2000.bsky.social @chuckles2000.bsky.social

MoonCoin mining. Duh.

aug 5, 2025, 1:37 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Dr. Goldfoot and the Bikini Machine (1965) @jubbeks.bsky.social

theres a single quote in there attributed to the 'directive' written by duffy that seems to imply whichever country builds a reactor first gets to essentially call dibs on use of the lunar surface in the future

aug 4, 2025, 10:20 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Dan Brogan @danbrogan.bsky.social

Right. I definitely understand dibs. If a nuclear reactor is how you call dibs on the moon, then so be it. I think I indicated as much in my second sentence.

aug 4, 2025, 11:34 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Gale Renee Walden @grw.bsky.social

In Chicago we just put a lawn chair in the shoveled out parking space.

aug 5, 2025, 7:55 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
helchose.bsky.social @helchose.bsky.social

Gotta get there before the Soviets beat us to it!

aug 4, 2025, 9:50 pm • 1 0 • view