It’s an especially silly thing for him to say when the only reason the movie got made was because George Harrison put his hand in his own pocket to pay for it… because… the studios weren’t interested!
It’s an especially silly thing for him to say when the only reason the movie got made was because George Harrison put his hand in his own pocket to pay for it… because… the studios weren’t interested!
Anything can get made if you have the time, talent and money. Whether anyone will show up is another story.
Indeed
Therefore, considering George Harrison is dead, he is perfectly right to say it would'nt be possible to make the film.
Strange, as well, as i reckon it's the most "current" of the Python movies in terms of its satire
why would we want to make 1970s humor in 2025? make that make sense. Palin should just go somewhere and retire quietly so not ruin his legacy talking stupid.
Sad thing is he basically has done.
People continuously say Blazing Saddles couldn't be made today but "R"-rated comedies handing a ration of shit to racists is always in style.
The Sheriff is near
Michael Palin: Dotty in his old age.
I’m just very grateful and happy that the unique circumstances that came together to make that film happen DID happen… and may other such cosmic meetings of the moment bring about other memorable gems.
Some bangers in this list! 💪🏼❤️👍🏼 en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HandMad...
Bizarrely I was thinking about en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullsho... today. Apparently on Amazon prime.
I went to the same drama school as Bruce Robinson, about 30 years apart though...but Withnail and I was utterly worshipped! Time Bandits was on Film4 just the other day, still utterly brilliant and weird and full of wonderful ideas!
Yeah. Beatle George is the most beloved Beatle in this household, because of the films, the Wilburys,THAT triple album, the Slide guitar, the flicks the amp back on don't fvck with me 'tood on the 🍏 Office rooftop. The whole let's just wave at it all-ness of George...
Actually, that's the thing isn't it? If you're mega rich, spend your money letting other people make interesting art
Cold Comfort Farm! I saw something nasty in the woodshed!!!
I love this movie, too!
Yep, including this one and I’ll fight anyone who disagrees 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼🤣
There was a Time Bandits TV series last year?! Why didn't anyone say anything?! 🤯
They never made a bad movie. And their name really suited them. Their films really did feel “handmade,“ put together with limited resources but infinite love and passion by the artists behind and before the cameras.
I wouldn't be me without Withnail & I.
I must have some booze. I demand to have some booze!
It was English cinema for a while
You’re right, Duncan, that list is incredible. The Long Good Friday and Mona Lisa, two of Bob Hoskins’ best. Sometimes this world gets lucky.
And this is how I learned that Taika Waititi did a remake of Time Bandits last year
Which is definitely worth checking out.
I'm absolutely going to
PS: I miss Terry Jones
Saw several of these films, but think Time Bandits remains my favorite, (along with Life of Brian). Time Bandits was fantastic.
So many corkers in there. Husband hadn’t even seen this one when we went as Sister Inviolata of the Immaculate Conception & Sister Euphemia of the 5 Wounds to a fancy dress shindig 🤦🏻♀️
Withnail and I. Incredible film.
Time Bandits was wonderful for this kid.
I rewatched Water the other day, that's a bonkers film. Absolutely teeters along the tightrope of racism but it's so heavy on the satire that it almost gets away with it, it's just Billy Connolly's singing guerrilla white saviour that lets it down at the end.
oh wow, I had no idea they did Pow Wow Highway. that's a great little road movie.
I love that movie.
Lock, Stock / Guy Richie! Hubs favorite.
How to Get Ahead in Advertising - BRILLIANT Thatcher-era satire!
We used to watch it once a year or so when I was in seminary. Absolute genius. And if you’ve never sat beside an Anglican priest as she sees it for the first time, you’re missing out.
Pretty sure there is an youtube clip of Palin debating a bishop when the movie first came out.
He was with John Cleese arguing the Python side and it was *Palin* who was the most agitated. The next week, Not The Nine of Clock News parodied the interview.
As long as he wasn’t bashing one…
It was Mervin Stockwood and other mad Christian Malcolm Muggeridge.
Also had a hand in the making of Withnail and I, one of the best movies ever made
It is my go-to despair-fighting weapon. Thanks to Mr Harrison. Wolf nipple chips and that.
I did not know it the one and only George Harrison who was HandMade Films. Nice factoid
I swear when I see this kind of thing I’m reminded of the saying die a hero or live king enough to become the villain. Disappointing but not surprising.
I'm used to people just ignoring the context of how things got made especially when they have no filmmaking experience, but it's weird when it's right from the source. All these "offensive" films constantly held up faced huge obstacles to even getting made let alone released.
Also, and this is important, you don't make Life of Brian without WANTING to be adversarial.
For real, as if 'cancel culture' and not that studios won't produce anything that's not algorithmically market tested and definitely won't cede any creative control isn't the actual reason nothing good can get made these days.
He probably got asked a very leading question, but yeah. Harrison did exactly what you’d hope someone with money and taste would do - take risks and make good stuff happen
In an ideal world, this would be more universally seen as a positive thing for people with money to do - but we seem to have eliminated the concept of supporting creativity without immediate payback.
That, and Cunk On Life exists.
Dogma anyone? OK it was 25 years ago. Christ I feel old. www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwSR...
He's not wrong -- George Harrison has been dead for 25 years. I'm sure that's not what he means though, sadly.
From what I gathered... Most of the people who say shit like this don't understand what Political Correctness means and they don't realize that the movies they comment on WERE in most cases politically correct. A lot of stuff like that is said on Blazing Saddles, a turbo woke movie.
Mel Brooks was told to not make the Sherrif black. Audiences wouldn't relate to a black protagonist, after all. He famously had trouble making it *at the time*. He just promised to act on feedback like that and then ignored it.
The goat!
He's right though - I know cock all about making movies. I'd make a complete pig's bumhole of it TBH.
Perhaps HE couldn’t make a movie like that. That’s a reflection of HIM not the industry or the world.
Life of Brian would perhaps be the least controversial film you could make today. Mockery of religion is standard
I thought I saw an entire comic-dramatization about the making of Life of Brian (starring Darren Boyd et al) and how controversial and politicizing LofB was back in the day. Guess I dreamed it.
The best version of this is Blazing Saddles which they couldn't make then, Gene Wilder just tricked and conned a bunch of people until they had too much money invested
It was supposed to fail, you see, so they could run off with the investors’ money quasi-legally
So, that's the plot of The Producers, which is also an awesome movie.
maybe if it was an already popular existing property and Palin was a jobbing work for hire with a famous daddy.
So, he’s not wrong: it couldn’t get made today because the tax incentives for the ultra-rich are different
You're right, but what I think what Michael Palin is saying is that Harry Styles is unlikely to personally fund a new Python film. Which, to be fair, is extremely true.
The PC police is a totally recent thing!
You either die the Graham Chapman, or you live long enough to become the John Cleese
Might just be talking about trying to get along with John Cleese🤷♂️
Yeah, I think what Palin is getting at is that all art that needs funding is at the mercy of the funders.
I'm pretty sure what he's getting at is that culture has changed and he's an old man now not a young up and Comer, so he's mad that people don't praise him for burnt old and curmogeony. He is not making a point about the funders.
That’s a given, as it happens to every generation. Someday today’s humor will in turn not be considered acceptable.
Movies that are critical of religion have always been difficult to make. Maybe it'd be harder now, but it was also very hard then. So, basically, there's no news here.
I had to wade through protesters to see Last Temptation of Christ.
If anything, its even easier to get it made now because of mechanisms like Crowdfunding if you've got a huge number of fans like Monty Python does.
Does it matter? Does anyone disagree with the fundamental point that Michael Palin is a pretty good guy and he’s entitled to say things that may be questionable and not be condemned for it?
Isn't this how everything works though, most things are done not because they are inevitable but because people make them happen Life isn't a bystander sport
Age makes them forgetful and silly, gotta love him anyway. Still not sure if he literally said that in the interview. We've been hearing that "you can't make jokes anymore" BS by this point it's a meme.
He’s a treasure. Ripping Yarns, Golden Gordon is one of my favorite things.
It was famously "the world's most expensive movie ticket."
Well you know make something satirical about that then, fucking dinosaurs.
we just gotta let old men (almost always men) yell at clouds. it's the circle of life.
Absolutely! 😂
I think he’s saying that it would be a career-ender today. I adore the Pythons and I don’t think Michael in particular is being a martyr here (pun intended).
And here I thought he was one of the less cooked pythons. Guess it's happened to them all
Good point, well made Side note: has he not been watching this series of Southpark? Beautifully subversive as shit. A different medium perhaps, but just as beautifully subversive. That’s the problem - Palin may choose not to watch ‘modern stuff’. It’s easier to revel in the past. And moan. Nowadays
You hear folks say this same thing, x amount of years after they were part of something even a wee bit edgy. Anything that has ever made could be made again. Your audience might be different, but you can still make absolutely anything.
The OG start up?
I remember reading about the resistance to that movie and how it only got made because of George Harrison. George Harrison and his Handmade Films were real cultural revolutionaries.
And doubly stupid because of this...! I mean Life of Brian was a *famously* controversial film *at the time*. youtu.be/XgKFWnZLgdc?...
That's what I remember. IIRC it was banned in various places, picketed in others and some cinemas refused to show it.
There's some delicious irony from that video of the guy complaining about the sermon on the mound scene where a guy on the outskirts doesn't understand what's being said.
And they LITERALLY caused controversy doing it. They weren't supposed to make it then, either!
I’m old enough to remember the wailing and gnashing of teeth.
"this hero, Jesus Christ, even has the same initials as John Cleese, the comic messiah"
The movie still causes gnashing teeth among conservative religious acquaintances.
That's part of his point. That while it was controversial then, it's worse now. “...now there would be much more of a battle. Sides would be taken and people would be influencing others over whether to see it. Everything is very adversarial and everyone flies off the handle much more quickly...”
Worse than being banned in at least one supposedly liberal European democracy and in parts of the UK?
That seems to be his assertion, based on what he's saying in the interview. It's possible I'm misinterpreting his words, you can have a read for yourself if you want to make sure. www.telegraph.co.uk/tv/0/michael...
It couldn’t be made today, because George Harrison is dead.
It couldn’t be made with George Harrison, is more accurate.
Exactly
Sorry if I missed this in replies but "Life of Brian" was banned in many countries and in assorted UK towns for years--a few places for decades. If someone spent $30m and made a similar movie now, it wouldn't be banned like that.
Even then they had distribution problems because of the controversy.
True!
A. John Cleese. The old fart who famously doesn't understand HE was the butt of the Loretta joke, not Loretta.
THANK YOU! It is why the movie got made. They weren't having then and they most likely won't have it now. We are at the mercy of Matt Groening's capable hands to push some buttons.
Also given the fights over its release and the fallout from the church.
Working Title: Life of Brian: The Resurrection Outline: And so it was, in the year of our lord 2026, Brian Cohen finally arrives back on Earth having been mistakenly beamed aboard a passing UFO and lived the past 2000+ years living on another planet where he has gained superhuman powers.
Whenever people say "Everything's too PC, you can't make anything offensive anymore" I usually just point out Jojo Rabbit, a comedy about a Nazi boy and his imaginary friend Hitler. That was offensive (complimentary), and it got a freaking Oscar!
'You couldn't make this nowadays', I tell myself, watching Young Sheldon with the lifeless eyes of a carp.
Yes. Did Michael forget the movie struggled to be released, was banned and boycotted? And who boycotted?
Literally a HandMade film. Maybe he was in Camelot when he said that 😬
Warner is literally publishing the Swamp Thing issues that were considered too controversial in the 80s.
Where'd you hear that? Swamp Thing #88, the only controversial one, is still unpublished, and the just announced TPB of that era of Veitch still doesn't include it.
It seems I have have been fed misinformation by a friend. He thought this was confirmed but it is not. I stand corrected and should have looked into it instead of taking his claim at face value. bleedingcool.com/comics/dc-to...
No worries, I was just wondering if I'd missed a newer announcement. (This has been a bee in my bonnet for awhile.)
💯 Good to have a friend like George! @ericidle.bsky.social
George Harrison funded Life of Brian? How did I not know this?
When the "It was better in the old days" propaganda has got to Michael Palin, you know the rot runs deep. He could be losing his marbles, I guess. Of course they'll all go mad except Gilliam, who was mad to start with.
I didn’t know that!
Well you'd probably cut out the trans jokes, but that's pretty much it.
It's a cop out They claim it's some PC pressure that might make introducing a movie from then now: 1) it's been done, so it won't be made now because it's derivative 2) what's funny is always a reflection of the current times, and because "Life of Brian" exists, no one needs make it
3) major studios HAVE made bigger budget, edgier films since 4) accessibility of other media with wider distribution make "movies" the less controversial place to push boundaries M Python had something to say then, but now? Shut it Boomer
Well, that’s true, but I won’t criticize Michael Palin.
He's getting on a bit. Let him decay in peace
Might be what he means. Nobody anywhere would have put money up.
With some of these articles I do wonder how many words are put into their mouths and twisted. He is a straight talking Yorkshire man and this article felt flip floppy in parts to me.
I think there's so much fear of commercial/creative risk now that pioneering work of the past like Life of Brian looks impossible to replicate today? And so many who challenged authority went on to accept MBEs, etc. I admire people like your Dad who never did that.. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...
The People’s Front of Judea!!
There’s (great) videos of him debating various bishops who mounted campaigns against it, documentaries showing the protests, actual censorship—what the hell is he going on about ?
Yeah, the financing they had set up fell through before Harrison came in and set up Handmade Films. It was controversial in several countries when it came out. Some of the jokes don’t land today, but that’s with any comedy.
Famously "the most expensive movie ticket in history"
Hello everyone here I'm new, and am here looking for a serious relationship. Thank u for your time!
If you're talking about studio movies, if it were made today, it would be The New Life Of Brian Part VIII, and you could buy a Lego set with the graffiti on the temple and one with the stoning scene. (Which I might actually buy 😁).
Oh, but he's absolutely right; it could be made today: as a YouTube video with a shitty mobile, a bad script, and 50 views. I watched it at least five times with my kids alone. Thanks, George!
You could definitely never make something like this these days…oh.
The fact is the George Harrison supply is dangerously low at present.
Michael Palin is feeling irrelevant. This only proves he is
I could read that headline as a joke (given the history of the film), but sadly, the bit of the interview attached feels like he's gotten conflict-avoidant following his wife's death.
It wouldn’t get made these days because rich people no longer fund independent films with pocket change to get out of paying taxes. Maybe the solution is to tax the rich more?
You wonder whether the “you couldn’t make this today” brigade have seen recent episodes of South Park?