Also Charlie Kirk is being…shall we say…duplicitous here. As he well knows, tariffs are taxes paid by consumers.
Also Charlie Kirk is being…shall we say…duplicitous here. As he well knows, tariffs are taxes paid by consumers.
love to know which 'experts' were 'wrong'. i want some specifics.
Please stop paying attention to Charlie Kirk
When is he not duplicitous?
My question is who is tracking the tariff income and where exactly is it going? Seeing as this is essentially a new tax, is the paper trail as detailed and thorough as it should be? I wouldn't be surprised if some of it was finding it's way into political slush funds and Trump's pockets.
I do appreciate the confirmation that higher taxes mean higher revenue, and conversely, tax cuts do not pay for themselves.
Yea, we’re all thrilled at paying more for all that shit. When do the grown ups get control again?
And tariffs should be more accurately described as "The New Federal Tax on All Imported Consumer Goods".
Why does Charlie Kirk have a voice? An uneducated, blindered, lapdog opportunist in the pay of billionaire crypto-fascist pseudo-Christians. When his hairline goes, his street cred will go with it.
Your statement answered your question
I guess Fat Donnie's little doodle is so small, Charlie Kirk can still talk with it in his mouth.
New book about Charlie Kirk that might be of interest bsky.app/profile/matt...
I don’t recall “the experts” saying tariffs wouldn’t raise revenue. I recall them saying that the countries the products are coming from don’t pay them and that ‘We the People’ ultimately pay them, either through increased prices or decreased profits. I wonder why Charlie didn’t mention that?
We should never pretend that guy has any idea what he's talking about. Pre-Internet he would've been the rando screaming on the corner.
Isn’t he one of the sycophants receiving laundered money from Putin?
About $300 per person
Every product has its own mix of the producer absorbing some through lower prices, the importer absorbing some through lower profits, and the consumer paying some through higher prices.
Accurately restated: "The Federal government has taxed and recieved an additional 100 billion from consumers and shareholders based on the whim of one guy."
And yet, any member of congress who pushed for a federal VAT would have been drummed out of office for supporting Euro-style socialism.
Every Dem legislator should be collecting real stories of constituents about how they have been negatively impacted by the ADDED COSTS hoisted upon them via Trump’s Tariffs.
Also, which experts said the tariffs wouldn't raise any revenue? The complaints are all about the economic effects as a result of that...
🧵 ⬇️ bsky.app/profile/jimm...
🧵 ⬇️ bsky.app/profile/jimm...
Where’s the money?
Recently I checked the price of copper because I was thinking about designing bronze light fixtures for a client. I was surprised that the price wasn’t bad. A day or 2 later the news changed.
In all fairness, he may not. No one has ever credibly accused him of being smart. 😂
The sums "generated" from tariffs will be, in effect, funding tax cuts for the wealthy.
Charlie Kirk is a brainless puppet
Where does this money go? Is it another slush fund?
Plus, I don’t think anyone was saying that tariffs would not raise revenue, in addition to who pays (consumers), the issue was with the knock on effects of the tariffs.
Help me Kai. 100 billion in tariffs translate how much in products and services not bought?
Yeah we want a refund
Kirk is not very intelligent. A tariff is a tax on imports that we pay. Who said that tariffs will not raise revenue?
Lying is a core component of who he is
Charlie Kirk is pretty dumb and I wouldn’t be surprised if he actually thought tariffs were paid by the exporter
Republicans raising taxes on the wrong people again