right but my point is that, for the latter point, it's "for now". it could very suddenly not be the case.
right but my point is that, for the latter point, it's "for now". it could very suddenly not be the case.
Okay, that's fair enough concern I guess. My point is this lady articulated an epistemological crisis posed by young men's penchant to be rubes, you climbed *all over* her mentions going "well wut abt how girls r rubes sometimes, what about if girls were worse!?" and that is embarrassing behavior.
that's a bit of a misrepresentation when 1) i did a QT, and was responded to via QT then 2) responded to arguments people were making/misrepresenting of what i'd said, lol
That is an incredibly lazy analysis of the veracity of your argumentation.
first of all,
Alright that one got a laugh.