If a LLM described water as h2o would you doubt its sources? You are free to argue that this argument is right or wrong since I fully adopt it as my own.
If a LLM described water as h2o would you doubt its sources? You are free to argue that this argument is right or wrong since I fully adopt it as my own.
Thing is, the LLM part is superfluous at best and it's a Gish gallop at worst. It's not that it's right or wrong, it's that LLM is extremely unreliable to the point that it's reckless, even fraudulent, to rely on it.
If it described the molecular formula of water as H2O, it's still an unreliable source that happens to stumble on something correct and it's something that LLM adds nothing to. It's just noise.
It's as if you manage to predict the weather with dices and a table. It doesn't prove that your dices have any predictive powers, it proves that a random process can occasionally spit outputs that align with the weather
The point that I used a LLM to create an answer is immaterial to whether or not the answer is factually correct or not.
Correction, the point is that you used LLM as an attempt to create illusory support for your unsupported but desired "answer".
No, The LLM crafted an explanation. You are too dishonest to evaluate if it is correct or not. SO you want to argue about the method of production rather than its content. Far easier for you to do that.
Besides the answer being straight up incorrect, if you thought that the method of production was irrelevant, you wouldn't have bothered to fraudulently fabricate "proofs "
Which is to say, we should consider the source of this information to be… you?
Happy to adopt this as my position. Is it correct or not? My position is that the term is used for two different concepts. One an evolved reproductive Strategy for a species; the other an old fashioned term for rare medical conditions.
And as such, no human can or ever has reproduced in both male and female roles. Whereas some snails routinely do this.
And, if he needs to use a llm, he is fundamentally a worse source than a mediocre high schooler. Or, he knows enough basic chemistry to make llm irrelevant.
Am I wrong about the two meanings of hermaphrodite?
Who said there only two definitions of that term?
Yes.