avatar
Cadaver Synod Participant @idontknowmanmaybe.bsky.social

Data entry error. -11.7 meant to be +11.7.

apr 15, 2025, 10:44 pm • 16 0

Replies

avatar
Convolver @convolver.bsky.social

They state R+11.7 in their commentary, so doesn’t seem so. My guess is small sample bias, but we don’t have raw numbers, just post-weight sample demos (and the data display is fucked up on that, percentage display that’s 2 OOM off, which was confusing at first).

apr 15, 2025, 11:06 pm • 9 2 • view
avatar
Convolver @convolver.bsky.social

They only glancingly mention the vast outlier in the 18-21 age range, which makes me think they know it’s a hinky result. These are undergrads conducting the poll, so moderate expectations accordingly.

apr 15, 2025, 11:11 pm • 6 1 • view
avatar
nirgalm25.bsky.social @nirgalm25.bsky.social

but than why are all the cross tabs in the under 30s dem +10? the 22-29 is only +6

apr 16, 2025, 1:44 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Convolver @convolver.bsky.social

I don’t have it in front of me, but there is in one of the docs a footnote that the weighting is different or excluded on the “under 30” cohort, so possibly an apples to oranges or apples to fish comparison going on.

apr 16, 2025, 1:50 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Convolver @convolver.bsky.social

(The data presentation on this is kind of driving me nuts, it’s very unclear what’s going on.)

apr 16, 2025, 1:50 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Robert Black @hurricanexyz.bsky.social

Lol that's That's some VERY different weighting

apr 16, 2025, 1:51 am • 6 0 • view
avatar
Robert Black @hurricanexyz.bsky.social

I'm still salty that the obviously horseshit polling methods from all last year turned out to be right It makes no sense!

apr 16, 2025, 1:51 am • 8 0 • view
avatar
The Fig Economy @figgityfigs.bsky.social

That was like, they all threw dice and guessed and turned out to be right. This looks like saying 2+2=17.

apr 16, 2025, 2:30 am • 7 0 • view
avatar
nirgalm25.bsky.social @nirgalm25.bsky.social

thinking more about it, and i don't have a great memory or other past polls in front of me but a generic 1.6 dem ballot lead among all voters doesn't seem compatible with being +10 among whites under 30 does it?

apr 16, 2025, 1:54 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
nirgalm25.bsky.social @nirgalm25.bsky.social

First result I found said <30 whites were +4 for Trump in 24 lol

apr 16, 2025, 3:18 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Stephen Judkins @stephenjudkins.bsky.social

most plausible explanation

apr 15, 2025, 10:53 pm • 12 0 • view
avatar
Cadaver Synod Participant @idontknowmanmaybe.bsky.social

I still don't see how the math gets there, but there's no way it gets there without it.

apr 15, 2025, 11:11 pm • 7 0 • view
avatar
James @toner56.bsky.social

Still doesn’t explain it. For another angle, how are men and women under 30yo 10% undecided, while 18-21 and 22-29 are 15% undecided? Those should be roughly the same, or at the very least overlapping ranges. Unless one grouping is unweighted raw results and the other is weighted??

apr 16, 2025, 12:23 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Cadaver Synod Participant @idontknowmanmaybe.bsky.social

I don't know. I just post here. Are you into curling? I used to have friends from North Dakota who were really into it. Seemed like a good time.

apr 16, 2025, 12:32 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
James @toner56.bsky.social

I am, it’s a flipping fantastic time! Difficult while still being accessible, and afterwards you hang out and drink with the other team! 🍻

apr 16, 2025, 12:42 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Cadaver Synod Participant @idontknowmanmaybe.bsky.social

Sports that are excuses for social drinking really are the best sports.

apr 16, 2025, 12:52 am • 0 0 • view