"ChatGPT, give me a read of Frith II that supports my patently unique interpretation of discrimination law."
Attorney at Law and the inflection point between fucking around and finding out. www.kusklaw.com
4,483 followers 266 following 4,632 posts
view profile on Bluesky
"ChatGPT, give me a read of Frith II that supports my patently unique interpretation of discrimination law."
I know this is what reading dismissals is usually like, but holy crap, that discrimination argument must've been dumb, becomes the Benny Hill music played in my head reading about it.
It's why treating them as search engines invites disaster, tbh.
We should teach a course. (...I need hours.)
I'd probably let him know that this is the start of a journey that ends in disbarment, and he needs to wise up and learn a thing or three about the tools he's using.
I don't think theyre going to get the immunity they seek. Not entirely. They'll get something, though.
I genuinely don't think anything else was coming, given recent exposure risks. They're gonna try to get their immunity in the legislature. Until then, you're gonna see a lot more all in posture on oversight and mitigation.
They dont think they're going to lose their immunity fights in the legislatures, for one. I dont think thats an assessment without basis, unfortunately.
Theres a lot of rumor that GPT 5 focused on these changes on particular, which would make juicy fucking discovery.
I wish more people adopted our trigger warning drafting. Truly.
Objectively true. The Civil War literally delayed the American century. We were fucking wrecked.
It literally defies mental modeling. But sure, not that bad.
I dont think many modern folks can comprehend "a quarter of the people you grew up and went to school with all die young in a collective mass trauma event". Imagine a school shooting, worse than Columbine by several orders of magnitude, happening in every school in the country over 4 yrs. Scary.
Not to mention the devastating and far reaching impacts of losing what amounts to a generation of your youth in or near their primes. WW2 was a hangover from WWI, objectively. We're arguably still not through what they did to us.
When the industrial revolution caught up to killing, war became something brand new.
Trench foot, famously not gruesome, famously fictional
In warfare prior to 1914, folks, if you marched off under your flag, you *probably* came home, and if you didn't, disease is more likely to have done you in than the enemy. If you fought at Verdun and came home, your prize was the knowledge you were the only one of your friends who did so.
They needed a quiet down day of 20k casualties before getting back to the 50k party.
The French mutinied after the Nivelle Offensive because it was too much fun and they were tired.
WWI was the first war in recorded history to have such voluminous primary sourcing from soldiers in the literal and metaphorical trenches. Never before had more literate armies gone to war. Never before had larger armies gone to war.
One of the worst things about the modern internet is you can pull up and app and just see a guy get murdered in the first video that loads when you do. No warning. Nothing. Now I just have to deal with that, I guess.
The right doesn't have a messaging problem. I know that hurts because of how awful that message often is, but we need to live in the world as it is, and on this planet, their base and a good chunk of independent and low-information voters are just fine with what they put out there, actually.
Like y'all, seriously, losers get dissected and winners get affirmed. Our media does that in sports, they do that in politics, they do it in entertainment. This is not remotely controversial. Doesn't mean the people who are winning are moral, ethical, or even worthy.
They're not making lists of things Republicans need to stop saying because GOP messaging is working. They're winning. Losers need to adjust things to stop losing as much and start winning more. Hence conversations about what they need to do different.
Yep. To the victor goes the spoils. Anything else is, literally, fact not opinion, loser shit.
But he lost. Mamdani is the Democratic nominee. He gets the support. Anything else is backing a loser.
You know, must lawyers understand why a lot of society gives us side eye. Prosecutors and political legal types struggle making the same realization in the legal community and I find that tone deafness ever telling.
"How bad slavery was" is worse. Much worse. Much worse than you think, much worse than you're taught, much worse than museums depict. Worse.
I've read all of them and they've literally never come up, ever.
Yeah, this is in the "no shit" category, unfortunately.
...why do people feel they're owed this dude's labor? Either he finishes or he doesnt. That's between him and his people. The rest of us get to wait.
Social media feeds just show this to me, I click it every time, and I'm reminded in mere moments this featured me when my "fried dough is the best thing ever" phase aligned with my "my job is now sedentary" phase.
There's also a mile of daylight between somebody who's put of step with the times but isnt a hostile actor and somebody who breaks bread with the enemy. Somebody who holds Republican social positions is a Republican
This form is usually filed with an 8b, which is a type of notice. As in, the type I like getting.
Wouldn't vote for him in a primary. Would vote for him if he won the primary. Absolute zero need to contemplate the latter this early, and all criticism of him at this point is fair game. He's gonna run, and he's gonna run on a very mixed record. Up to him to earn it.
I genuinely feel bad for lawyers in states where they're forced to respond to every thing. Some stuff is so clearly to harass.
I'll never find out about em, we don't get notified unless they reach a certain stage.
Next you're gonna tell em romantic love is conditional and really blow their minds.
CPA orders, famously quick to get, totally don't require notice.
The amount of time I bleed on shit that isnt billable is enough to pay off my goddamn house.
Nonono, shhhh. He means, tell him you sympathize about having to answer shit same day. That's tough. Damn plaintiffs lawyers, getting everything they need, all expeditious like.
May the only meet and confers you ever need have be collaborative!
I could give lectures, plural, on how bullshit that is.
Not hard to do more than "none", to be fair.
That's a very easy block.
Proximate causation is often *but not always* literal!
Ten years ago it'd have been, at least in part, a reaction to how underdeserved that sterling reputation was. It actually aint sterling anymore!
Wants the world moved amd the aeons wound back. Doesn't want to pay a lick for any of it.
Irrespective of whatever this is about, its amazing how an Ivy league JD has ceased to be a flex almost entirely. Amazing brand collapse in a fairly brief time.
She broke down like five different times in an hour. Impressive, honestly, must've been some grade 1 validation.
Or a first amendment cause of action literally at all.
He's right, unfortunately. Education won't fix this, because it didnt break it. So, so much is responsible- more than a sigle better Civics course at 13 could fix.
Dershowitz knows political beliefs arent protected. He knows he's bullshitting. Which means he's being a bully. Using his education, status, and special privilege to menace somebody who doesnt like him and is validly using their freedom of association. I hate that shit, man. Disgraceful.
I built one once. It was a blast, its cool as hell, its the hardest model I've ever done by far and one was enough
It was ChatGPT the whole time. I suspect this will explain a lot of things. Like how I used my time travel abilities.
I use em dashes all the time. Nobody mistakes my shit for AI because it ranges from pretty good to great. Skill issue.
It'll tide me over until Kikanbo does in "at home" kit I can import.
Tate and them talk *at* other men. We can do better, actually.
One thing that would help the whole "male loneliness" thing would be if we talked to *each other*. As in, other men. Showed vulnerability. Maybe even told each other how one can healthily date, given we're primary sources on how men find dates. Or we can keep yelling at women about it, I guess.
And I think thats his core point.
...they gotta be joking right Please Please be joking
...I don't have any happy stories certificates for "she forced personal growth upon me" and that seems like graphic design effort with limited utility. Best I can do is this acknowledgement, here.
The problem isn't the "not getting laid". It's the "and most voices reaching young men who are stressed about sex and masculinity are cryptofascist *at best*, but with that tweak in framing, yeah.
Nobody uses the form, they just skip right to the incoherent emailing
Sure thing buddy. All the attention. Very attentive. Getting right on it.
They can fill out the form and it'll be addressed with the appropriate urgency.
...dude. If there's ambiguity you say "you said this not that and I genuinely and honestly believed so." You dont say "well I could've interpreted it some whacked out way so". Idiot.
I got the idea from a video I cant find but I'll post if I do. The key is to get the new broth nice and combined and actually a broth. A lot of people cook their noodles in an "eyeballed" water amount, which is cool. Just make sure there's enough for soup.
You can elevate literally anything. My personal taste is, if I like something, be it from a bag, box, or made from scratch, whats to stop ya from playing with it more.
I think that's absolutely common law battery. Whether its assault out of a penal code depends on the code, but conceptually, yes, reasonable.
Cook it all together a bit, combine. Fun little "bachelor as f***" izekaya simulation.
If you want a more traditional Tokyo flavor, substitute the broth for your pasta water, another yolk, spoonfuls of minced garlic, a little ginger and some chili oil or chili crunch. I probably do it that way more, tbh, its just a mood thing, rich vs a sort of creamy.
Stochastic terrorism does tremendous damage, to our civil fabric and to our democracy, and while the law has been somewhat to slow to catch up expressly, the common law of torts is replete with theory rendering it all sorts of actionable. We did good work here.
Boil your noodles in a pot. In a sauce pan, do an egg yolk, the seasoning, the pepper paste, a little mayo, a little half and half, and a half cup of chicken bone broth. Combine with a hard-boiled egg and some fried pork belly, and some green onion. If you want to elevate it a bit.
Sucker punching down is a particularly heinous variety of assault. Punching down on somebody who hit you first is playground justice.
My nose is bleeding. Evil. Evil!
I need smelling salts
I literally got lightheaded reading this. I think I just narrowly averted a stroke.
Apparently, white women with big tits in jean ads are either Big Denim taking a stand against DEI or taking a stand for eugenics. There is much debate as to which on such bastions of critical thought as TikTok, reddit, and X. Or some shit, real life is weird anymore.
I'll give the tiktokers this: The right wing take on this still manages to be a good bit dumber, so they held serve.
...that's probably the dumbest thing I've googled all month, and there was competition dude
I feel for academics. Life is getting uncomfortable for them in a lot of cases, and its gonna come from both ends for a while. (Correcting this and making good on the harm the collaborators do will take time) Their institutions did this to them. Directing their anger anywhere else misplaces it.
Theres some weird fetish shit going on in there, if my radar for online male loser is still tuned up
This is going to take a long time to fix. A generation, probably. Disgraceful.
And the benefits that come with those opportunities, they're real.
Unfortunately, that would likely drive women out of sports with stakes/elite competition altogether, and that simply isn't fair.
Nothing wrong with that if thats the overt understanding.
It's flat-out dumb. Man won the primary, and excites people. That's it. That's all it has to be.
Right? Talk about an *actual* demographic timebomb.
Disagreeing with what I've written and having either poor reading comprehension or a bad faith edgelord loser approach to politics is a foreseeable correlation, tbh.
I've been trying to be better aboit mocking fragility, but fuck, man, this shit is so damn soft.
That dude loved the national prayer breakfast. Considerable effort expended.
I am, in all inexplicable seriousness, somewhat knowm for that.
I'm gonna get another hate Fax, watch.
Dude was damn good on the judiciary, too.
A thing 70+% of his constituents do.
I mean, the best man I've ever known taught Sunday school, folks need to unheadass.
I wouldn't hold Krysten Sinema against another areligious candidate, for example. That'd be stupid.
