You just said so much that I'm blocking you to ensure I don't have to hear about it again. Also, I bet I. An reduce stupid sports crap on my feed by filtering any use of "NCAA".
You are here because you read my words and got mad before you understood them.
50 followers 0 following 878 posts
view profile on Bluesky
You just said so much that I'm blocking you to ensure I don't have to hear about it again. Also, I bet I. An reduce stupid sports crap on my feed by filtering any use of "NCAA".
Get it together man. You are literally saying the government is somehow required to buy cat stairs with extra money they have because that's how government works. You are insane.
That's fun for 10 minutes, then you need to figure out what to do with your life.
Nope. You are an idiot.
It's so very weird that you are trying to play down a fully fungible asset like literal money like it doesn't matter because of where it came from or what it was intended for.
And therefore it's fine for someone to take it from you for some little wood stairs?
$100k for some cats? Look, Amsterdam, you are cool and everything but someone is taking your money.
Omg, I thought I was actually talking to a reasonable person.
MUST we have pineapple on our pizza?
So how badly do people want cheerleaders to have gay dancers dancing gay? Bad enough to make their whole clientele feel disgusted?
I suspect the 🤮 response is an innate reaction programmed by human natural history, similar to seeing maggots. I don't think there is empirical evidence for that rn, I just know what it feels like.
The thing is, I think I know what the men in the study actually experience because I experience it too. When I see men kissing I have the whole 🤮 response. Maybe it's right or wrong or cultural, but it is nevertheless true, and I prefer not to experience it when I see cheerleaders.
This cunt is exactly what I'm talking about.
I think it's probably the innate sense of disgust. www.psypost.org/straight-men...
I'm finished supporting anyone's rights until mine are taken seriously.
I just sorta talked about this in a different thread under that comment. You are right, the idea that we can ferret apart the details here is crazy and I don't want to.
It's a mess of semantic nonsense. And as much as it hurts, I don't have the patience for it on Twitter. It's not a place where I an expect to have genuine conversation with smart people, particularly about this topic.
Second: We'd have to preestablish what is a 'space for men'. For example, is the 'Satisfactory' game a space for men? Does it exclude women? How does it even qualify for the discussion and why would we talk about that one? Also, I've never played it so how would I know?
There are various problems here. First: I realized after my last tweet that it's a sort of impossible thing to discuss online. The reason is because everything (e.g. female heroes and attention) counts as "criticizing sexism and toxic tropes" in your mind and this satisfies any point you wish.
Translated: "Your cherry picked specific example doesn't illustrate the phenomenon."
The inability to apply reasoning abstractly or generally is a classic sign of low intelligence.
It doesn't have to have sexism or toxic tropes. It can be entirely neutral but if women aren't explicitly included and catered to then it becomes an issue.
Hypothetically, if the US suffers the emergence of a Hitleresque authoritarian it would, in fact, be a pretty acceptable thing to scour the White House of any sign of it's presence.
Translated: "Trump administration will explicitly participate in a government coverup of child sexual assault on Friday."
I'm sure it will totally not be selective material intended to shut people up about the issue and ignore what's obviously behind the curtain.
Disclosure: I didn't take the time to verify the data in this article is not adjusted. Nevertheless, if the UK is similar to the US then young female graduates are making 8% more than their male counterparts.
These statistics classically do not adjust for anything. Not even for the number of hours worked. So unless you figure a barista working 20 hours a week ought to earn the same as a doctor working 40 hours a week it doesn't mean anything.
Yes. That's exactly the business plan. Collect all of everyone's money AND drive away people who need actual healthcare. Success.
I'm not expressing any opinions, I was just pointing out your mistake.
I'm hoping this isn't fake, so he can just die.
They aren't doing lifting and acrobatics. They are doing sexy-girl-dancing alongside the female cheerleaders. They are an experiment with queerness.
One thing isn't the same as the other thing. I think there is a distinct difference. For the record, I don't really care, but your argument isn't sound.
These are not that kind of male cheerleader.
These are not that kind of male cheerleader.
I am liberal as hell and I kinda dislike it and it's hard to pinpoint why. I think I'm just experiencing fatigue from queerness infiltrating everything and making it about themselves. Like wtf you can't just let the cheerleaders be hot chicks? Just let the cheerleaders be hot chicks, wtf.
It's the right move but be real, they only did it because their jobs are on the line.
The useless people are worried about their hobbies again.
White people crime: "Threw a sandwich and ran."
I approve.
"While" is a typo for "whip". But also, stop being a fucking cunt.
Logical fallacies have to violate logic. It's not the same as what you intend, but that "where does it stop" thinking is a slippery slope fallacy. So while this out when people are doing that. yourlogicalfallacyis.com/slippery-slope
I don't get it. But yeah, I'll save you a seat.
And just like that... your vote doesn't matter and our elections are a token gesture. It was hanging on until the Rs in Texas decided to flagrantly cheat.
I ignore any headline that uses the word "slam".
Quit being a little bitch?
Lionheart Sandwich. I approve of this.
Yeah, the most messed up thing about is that it doesn't matter if there's a disaster instead of a boom. They will still profit from it, perhaps moreso.
I can assure you that unsolicited music from the neighborhood is rarely considered "entertaining".
Wait what? Why would she run in 2028? If she's the candidate she loses. How long so we have to do this dance.
"Protect the power"? What does that mean exactly? Look, can't we just have voting districts that are agnostic toward the characteristics of the people within?
No oxford comma. Clearly the men are being introduced to the women and dogs.
Reality doesn't care what you declare to be true.
At this time they appear to be concerned about the availability and quality of data and not so much that it's purposeful misinformation. But they acknowledge the risk of that has increased. newrepublic.com/post/198464/...
Baaahahaa. Yeah. Yeah, now I want a wave to come.
No. I just like to have correct data. Japan seems to have the highest legit IQ.
I Iiterally have no idea why your panties are all bunched up right now. Did I say something wrong?
The US scores about 100 on IQ tests. I guess this is because only half of them can read, or in spite of it, or something, whatever your point was.
Extremely low scores like this are associated with cultures that engage largely in lifestyles that are concrete and unsophisticated. It's not that Somalians are naturally dumb, just that they don't have lives that use abstract or strategic thinking.
It's hard to get good data on this lately because certain countries (e.g. China) work to make the Internet say they are super-smart. But the metric of 68 is correct for Somalia, using some of the best data available. www.qeios.com/read/6LBP4T
He's green on TDS but he's the best comic there, and his work is focused on current events. I think he should be the permanent host someday.
Looks like it's working. Keep the bombs coming.
I'm 50 and I'm not that old.
Let me guess. Someone wants to do something and suddenly that's a "sacred" area.
I see that we are on the same team here but Biden definitely jumped the shark, Trump is just dumb.
Omg. They can't be so dumb that they can't see that they are implying that Trump should be allowed to rape kids because somebody they dislike also did it? . Like... like should I be allowed to murder and eat some people because Jeff Dahmer got away with it for a while?
You can't have it both ways, ladies. Either don't need boyfriends or quit bitching about how hard it is to find a boyfriend.
No, it's true. I tried watching it and it's just impossible. The only reason is to be able to say you did it.
That's a SpaceX Falcon9 rocket. Based on the date and the fact you aren't in the Atlantic Ocean it's probably 24 Starlink satellites being launched from Vandenberg Space Force base in California.
popvssoda.com
Your data appears poor. I have a screenshot for 2003 and 2025.
Do you want reproductive rights? Do you think men should also have reproductive rights? I already know your answer. How about equal rights in the courtroom? How about a little attention to young men attending college? What percentage of men get SNAP benefits? Housing benefits? Child support?
Also, let me be PERFECTLY CLEAR. Do you NOT see the obvious fucking male exodus that is literally the point of this entire thread? Do you think it is fake just because you have excuses? What do you think will happen if you keep parading your excuses? You aren't even acknowledging the problem.
Okay, now learn statistics and do some careful evaluation instead of applying your anecdotal evidence and pretending you are capable of basic reasoning skills. Also, what percentage of men live off SNAP benefits? Who gets child support? Who gets housing support? Who is "doing the work"?
Hmm, good job arguing against an intentional oversimplification. In other news, do you know any women bricklayers?
Nice job applying generalizations and bias to a group based on their race and sex. Now, consider the possibility that men aren't going to do things like support reproductive rights for people who don't support reproductive rights for men. Dipshit.
You want the same thing men were getting before, nothing. Which is the reason they left. Those men were your allies. Young men are voting R too, because this is the only world they've ever known, the one where Ds think men are evil and don't care about them.
That won't bring back men. If you want the men voting liberal then liberal policies have to start including men. The "allies for nothing" time is over.
The real problem is that men do all the work and get nothing for it. That's obviously a massive simplification, but that's the problem. Give all men's work to whatever minority is the loudest and see how men vote. The days where men tried to be allies are over.
They are right. The muslim-esque guy who won in the blue region is absolutely not the model you want.
"is t" is supposed to be "isn't"
That's what I was thinking... This is t the lawsuit Donald wants, because the evidence probably exists.
Fuck you and fuck your filthy progeny.
You are stuck in level 6 thinking. I'm just above you, that's all.
I'm educated enough that I've gone all the way around back to the start and it turns out they are Indians.
Hey Indians, remember smallpox? RFK is against vaccines. Have some raw milk and let me know how it goes.
Coca Cola are masters of promising things and not doing them. I guarantee you that delaying until Trump is dead and gone is easy mode for them.
She looks like some dumb cunt.
Forgot the tail.
Or, consider this wild idea: We weren't visited by aliens.
You found a cruel zoo some place in Asia and posted about it in English on Twitter and insinuated it's my fault somehow because of my summer plans as if a zoo owner in Myanmar is going to feed his lion more if Americans don't show up. You can't possibly be this dumb, you are doing it on purpose.
Politicians used to at least keep you guessing about whether they are lying. Trump says he's 6'3" and 220 pounds. He also says there's no Epstein client list.
Hmmm. Is the next group grandma's that smell funny? Because we really SHOULD do something about that.
This is level 6 thinking. Which is basically "everyone's perspective is equally valid", the problem is that religious people (Muslims) use level 4 thinking, which is "There is one way everything should be, and it's this way". And that's why level 6 thinking can get you destroyed.
That's a pretty normal rate of inflation. Enjoy it whole it lasts because tariffs and meddling in the Fed are happening.
You got the ball across the line or whatever. Yep. You sure did. Here you go.
Arctic sea ice is already doomed.
If you'd like my personal recommendation. Be honest. If you want people to be nice to animals then argue for being nice to animals. Everyone knows you have a different goal and that makes you dishonest even when you are correct about the facts.
The point is: The ulterior motives in your argument (save the cows or whatever) won't reduce carbon emissions. I think you already know that, because you aren't stupid, but you figure you can manipulate people anyway. And those manipulation tactics are why everyone rolls their eyes at PETA.